Evidence for Evolution: resources

Phronesis said:
Just like brains, the appendix, failing kidneys, common sense :eek:? Nice logic there ;) Natural-selection-did-it...
Click to expand...

He he..
I do accept that evolution exists and that it happens every day... Just not inter species evolution. The proof that exists in its favor is either unverifiable or verified by other experts who are looking to prove inter species evolution themselves. As a plausible idea, it’s a great one. But one or two deformed skulls and a whole lot of microscopic jargon don’t constitute proof in my book. The odds of all life evolving from single celled life forms is so great against, you would have more chance of getting the winning numbers for every lotto ticket you bought from today until you die.Personally I think that “thou protesteth too much “ comes in to play with most evolutionists. It’s a sensitive subject for most people, but generally only evolutionists get aggressive about it…
 
Madman88 said:
He he..
I do accept that evolution exists and that it happens every day... Just not inter species evolution. The proof that exists in its favor is either unverifiable or verified by other experts who are looking to prove inter species evolution themselves. As a plausible idea, it’s a great one. But one or two deformed skulls and a whole lot of microscopic jargon don’t constitute proof in my book. The odds of all life evolving from single celled life forms is so great against, you would have more chance of getting the winning numbers for every lotto ticket you bought from today until you die.
Click to expand...
Unless the odds are front-loaded and rigged :p.
 
Madman88 said:
He he..
I do accept that evolution exists and that it happens every day... Just not inter species evolution. The proof that exists in its favor is either unverifiable or verified by other experts who are looking to prove inter species evolution themselves. As a plausible idea, it’s a great one. But one or two deformed skulls and a whole lot of microscopic jargon don’t constitute proof in my book. The odds of all life evolving from single celled life forms is so great against, you would have more chance of getting the winning numbers for every lotto ticket you bought from today until you die.Personally I think that “thou protesteth too much “ comes in to play with most evolutionists. It’s a sensitive subject for most people, but generally only evolutionists get aggressive about it…
Click to expand...

There is no mechanism that would stop 'inter species evolution'. btw The term you want is speciation.

Speciation has been a) observed and b) as I said there is nothing to prohibit it.

Billions of small changes over millions and millions and millions of years add up.

No front loading needed.

Phrony, if he really was interested in science, should have pointed that out to you as opposed to yet again bring his creation biases to play.
 
cyghost said:
There is no mechanism that would stop 'inter species evolution'. btw The term you want is speciation.

Speciation has been a) observed and b) as I said there is nothing to prohibit it.

Billions of small changes over millions and millions and millions of years add up.
Click to expand...
What laws says billions of small changes adds up to big changes? I mean, billions of small changes over billions of years can give....billions of other small changes not? Natural selection does nothing. It does not add up small changes over time. You know this by now (well one would hope so).
Add a billion small changes to this screen

snow.gif

over a billion years... you should get billions of small changes over billions of years. Natural selection played a role....no big difference. or do you think you are going to watch MTv over a few billion years on that screen?

cyghost said:
No front loading needed.

Phrony, if he really was interested in science, should have pointed that out to you as opposed to yet again bring his creation biases to play.
Click to expand...
As opposed to your unscientific anti-creation biases? Define front loading before you make the unscientific assertion that it is not needed.
 
Last edited:
Once more, phony, I am not engaging you in this thread. I just repeat this because I knwo you struggle with reading comprehension. So if you feel I am ignroing you, I really am.
 
And if you have billions of frames with small changes over billions of years? Thinking of watching MTV any time soon? Or anything different from the above? Any nice black and white pictures perhaps?
 
Last edited:
Sorry, moelich, Kevin Hovind didn't make the cut :(

We're not teaching the controvesy here.

Thanks anyway.
 
Cyghost - just ask the mods to lock this thread please - it is being trolled by phronesis (expected better than that from you - I'm dissapointed) and madman88 that is just trolling for the sake of trolling.
 
Hold on chap, who decided to talk about christians and muse on the existence of God? Yes lock it because that person started to veer off from his own topic if you want argue about it...
Mind telling what you added?
 
rwenzori said:
A Telephronetic sockpuppet?
Click to expand...
Didn't see it had only one post. :rolleyes: Weird but I don't think phrony is a Ken Hovind fan.
Kage said:
Cyghost - just ask the mods to lock this thread please - it is being trolled by phronesis (expected better than that from you - I'm dissapointed) and madman88 that is just trolling for the sake of trolling.
Click to expand...
Thing is I may want to bump it from time to time and add some more resources where appropriate.
 
The person that de-railed the thread first was Anony-mousse and then Madman88 came along happily trolling away and then you (phrony) seem to get carried away...
See page 1 post #10 onwards.

@ Cyghost - I understand that you might want to get this bumped now and then and ad more info...
If you want to get this as factual as possible then rbp posts that tend to get the thread derailed and get the posts deleted. :p
LOL - would like to see this stickied actually - seems factual and non confrontational.
Will be a great FAQ for ToE for MBB.
 
Last edited:
What exactly are you doing here mind you? Besides moaning and derailing the thread into a moan-fest.
 
Kage said:
The person that de-railed the thread first was Anony-mousse and then Madman88 came along happily trolling away and then you seem to get carried away...
See page 1 post #10 onwards.
Click to expand...

Cyghost is correcting the liars, something I wish others would do more of here. Rather correct the liar, then let someone get suckered by their snake tongues. Phrony derailed the thread way back as well.. well actually just about every thread to do with evolution in this section while he pushes his Intelligent design agenda in the natural sciences section.

The mods dont remove the lies. You should know this by now. Hence people like Zana, Good Life and Phrony can pollute this area as much as they want and they know it.
 
W1zzy has a problem with preadaptations and moans again...telling others they are liars and making awful generalizations..... nothing new :rolleyes:.

Now is a good time to lay out your problem with preadaptations ;).
 
w1z4rd said:
Cyghost is correcting the liars, something I wish others would do more of here. Rather correct the liar, then let someone get suckered by their snake tongues. Phrony derailed the thread way back as well.. well actually just about every thread to do with evolution in this section while he pushes his Intelligent design agenda in the natural sciences section.

The mods dont remove the lies. You should know this by now. Hence people like Zana, Good Life and Phrony can pollute this area as much as they want and they know it.
Click to expand...


sorry - was typing too slow - that was a response to phrony - should have quoted him...:o
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X