F1 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.
Naks said:
FIA exit for ex-Mercedes lawyer was inevitable after controversies: https://racingnews365.com/fia-exit-for-ex-mercedes-lawyer-was-inevitable-after-controversy

"... there were suspicions that continuing links to her former employer Mercedes resulted in the TD designed to raise ride heights – the Three-Pointed Star’s car suffered particularly when run low to the ground as others could.

While in September, Mercedes was amongst the first teams to have details on Red Bull’s overspends, tellingly a week before the team was officially informed by Rao. Go figure.

Speaking during the Canadian Grand Prix, Red Bull boss Christian Horner was particularly suspicious about the TD, pointing out that the matter had not followed due process yet a team - believed to be Mercedes - had arrived in Montreal with the appropriate parts before the TD was even published.

"It has [first] to be discussed in a technical forum [which it wasn’t], plus it is overtly biased to sorting one team’s problems out – the only team who turned up here with it, even in advance of the technical directive,” he said. So, work that one out… "
Click to expand...
I see the "So work that one out"...
tit for tat
*yawn*
That said, anyone who thinks that isn't a conflict of interest isn't paying attention.
 
Geez, lots of people here get very nasty and defensive when the discussion doesn't go there way... :ROFL:
 
OhYeah84 said:
Precedent though had been set in 2016. Happy to back his team mate up and "race fix". Same as what Max would have done to LeClerc in order to allow Checo to gain a distance advantage.

Not that difficult to see the similarities.
Click to expand...
But the 2016 incident with Ham and Nic is entirely different context, not the same? Hamilton wasn't trying to help somebody else do better in the championship, he was trying to help himself win the championship. Entirely different situation, apples vs oranges?

Not defending MV, certainly think the boy-child has alot of growing up still to do, but the 2016 incident as the comparison/precedent really makes no sense in context and purpose.
 
greg_SA said:
Geez, lots of people here get very nasty and defensive when the discussion doesn't go there way... :ROFL:
Click to expand...
Always. Your lesson for the day: NEVER go against Hamilton. It will bring down the wrath of MyBB on you.
 
Naks said:
FIA exit for ex-Mercedes lawyer was inevitable after controversies: https://racingnews365.com/fia-exit-for-ex-mercedes-lawyer-was-inevitable-after-controversy

"... there were suspicions that continuing links to her former employer Mercedes resulted in the TD designed to raise ride heights – the Three-Pointed Star’s car suffered particularly when run low to the ground as others could.

While in September, Mercedes was amongst the first teams to have details on Red Bull’s overspends, tellingly a week before the team was officially informed by Rao. Go figure.

Speaking during the Canadian Grand Prix, Red Bull boss Christian Horner was particularly suspicious about the TD, pointing out that the matter had not followed due process yet a team - believed to be Mercedes - had arrived in Montreal with the appropriate parts before the TD was even published.

"It has [first] to be discussed in a technical forum [which it wasn’t], plus it is overtly biased to sorting one team’s problems out – the only team who turned up here with it, even in advance of the technical directive,” he said. So, work that one out… "
Click to expand...
Called that long ago. We know how they work, Merc and FIA have been at it for years. The whole Masi was guilty of human error was also a scam. What a toxic team. Was helped by FIA for 8 years to get world titles and the moment they down, they organize mid-season rule changes.
 


b5cea6e1b2bb903e5a2369a70ea16712.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X