So the stewards are applying the original rule and the mentions of not being allowed to touch the yellow line were inaccurate.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.

And why even have both? It's a simple thing to clarify before the season even startsAfter last year, we had all hoped that consistency would rule in F1. This BS just causes toxicity between fans....
Agree, rules should clear & precise, touch me in my studio ( lines ) and you should be reprimanded, do it a few times, you should be penalized... Just like in Moto - touch the green area ....And why even have both? It's a simple thing to clarify before the season even starts
Isn't the race directory's job to enforce the rules rather than change them?So basically the FIA have nullified any race directors ability to do anything that is in contravention of the sporting code. Which, in isolation sounds correct but I would've thought staying to the right of the pit exit was a safety thing within the race director's powers but guess that now is not.
If he stalled the car 1mm from the finish line he would have normally DNF'd but to please this "ag shame" generation they would probably give it to himVerstappen actually lost the back end a bit coming out of the pits, if he just touched the line I don't see what the issue is?
Ag shame.If he stalled the car 1mm from the finish line he would have normally DNF'd but to please this "ag shame" generation they would probably give it to him
Nope, if you listened to Verstappen, he also questioned why they couldn't go racing and asked what the hold up was. Selective inattention is a thing...Heard now, that Charles and Carlos were the only 2 that wanted to go racing. Everybody else said it's too wet.
Sounds like they're sore losers and trying to do something to make up for the cock-up of a pitstop that Le Clerc went through. Kind of like using a bit of misdirection.So the stewards are applying the original rule and the mentions of not being allowed to touch the yellow line were inaccurate.
All correct except the highlighted part, they cleared that track up bloody fast considering how hard that crash was. The track is a snooze fest though.Monaco needs to be retired as a venue. It's tired, and from a different era of F1. It's a terrible track, the surface is inconsistent, the pit areas are underdeveloped, the barriers on the track are not modular at all, and any crash causes significant delays, as we saw yesterday. There is no real DRS zone potential. It's just a tired old course that's all snazzy because of being in Monaco, but as a racers course, it's dismal. Zero opportunity to pass, or take risks, no shoulders. It's just done.
It's historic and there's obviously much prestige for winning it. Money to be made there as per the large yachts in the various locations.Monaco needs to be retired as a venue. It's tired, and from a different era of F1. It's a terrible track, the surface is inconsistent, the pit areas are underdeveloped, the barriers on the track are not modular at all, and any crash causes significant delays, as we saw yesterday. There is no real DRS zone potential. It's just a tired old course that's all snazzy because of being in Monaco, but as a racers course, it's dismal. Zero opportunity to pass, or take risks, no shoulders. It's just done.
I'm not a fan of the track as a racecourse, but it does provide a different challenge to the drivers as opposed to other circuits. The race itself is obviously boring as can be, but I found the quali to be a good watch. I think there's space for a race weekend like this in a calendar of 20+ races.It's historic and there's obviously much prestige for winning it. Money to be made there as per the large yachts in the various locations.