South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Why, they would have hired a better driver?![]()
‘If we spent 300k more, 2021 championship outcome would have changed’ – Hamilton
Lewis Hamilton says the outcome of the 2021 Formula 1 World Championship would have been different if Mercedes “spent 300,000” on car developments.www.eurosport.co.uk
Pretty sure any strategist they hired wouldn’t have contemplated the Masi reinterpretation of the rules and RB influence leading to human error and all that.Might have been better spending that money on sending their pitstop strategist to the pitstop-under-a-safety-car class.
Yes like Latifi or Maldonado, just a crap driver, no real race senseHe's just a driver so probably just mad ramblings.
Why, they would have hired a better driver?
yes i know the cap excludes driver salary
RB influence. Lol.Pretty sure any strategist they hired wouldn’t have contemplated the Masi reinterpretation of the rules and RB influence leading to human error and all that.
Why did Masi need an NDARB influence. Lol.
Don't know? Maybe they didn't want him to reveal the Mercedes bribe?Why did Masi need an NDA![]()
Yeah I don’t recall him saying “understood” to anything Merc had to say…Don't know? Maybe they didn't want him to reveal the Mercedes bribe?
With logic like that Ferrari would snap you up for their strategy team.Don't know? Maybe they didn't want him to reveal the Mercedes bribe?
First thing I'd teach them is to pit for new tyres under a late safety car. Oh wait, even they already do that.With logic like that Ferrari would snap you up for their strategy team.
You should post an application.![]()
Unfortunately the Japanese weather isn't such a team player.
True or False? - If the safety car regulations had been followed according to past (even Masi) precedent and as written the race would have ended under safety car thus negating the need to pit.First thing I'd teach them is to pit for new tyres under a late safety car. Oh wait, even they already do that.
All teams had agreed that race should not end under safety car. Masi's error was with moving lapped cars out of the way. Part 1 of his error was the "lapped cars may not overtake". Then, when he correctly got the lapped cars moving, his part 2 of the error was not sending ALL to unlap themselves. If you take away those errors, no problem.True or False? - If the safety car regulations had been followed according to past (even Masi) precedent and as written the race would have ended under safety car thus negating the need to pit.
No, all teams preferred a race not ending under safety car. That doesn’t mean there was an expectation that regulations would be sacrificed to achieve it nor did this give any overriding of the regulations legitimacy. The “human errors” were just that.All teams had agreed that race should not end under safety car. Masi's error was with moving lapped cars out of the way. Part 1 of his error was the "lapped cars may not overtake". Then, when he correctly got the lapped cars moving, his part 2 of the error was not sending ALL to unlap themselves. If you take away those errors, no problem.