F1 2024

Status
Not open for further replies.
Craig_ said:
And it's the same wet gossip queen aunties dropping links about this stuff and then not correcting their gossip after it turns out to be BS. Same person hurriedly posted the Suzie drama and then didn't utter a peep when it turns out to be BS.
Click to expand...

I saw that, very quick to post nonsense meme style, notice none of the peanuts had any issue with his fake posts?
 
Dave said:
I saw that, very quick to post nonsense meme style, notice none of the peanuts had any issue with his fake posts?
Click to expand...

But dare you mention some key words from 2 years back, or some more recent cheating scandals, then certain members wets themselves with outrage. You guys keep on interacting with the JCVD moron, you should stop. If you entertain clowns like that you embolden them.
 
Craig_ said:
But dare you mention some key words from 2 years back, or some more recent cheating scandals, then certain members wets themselves with outrage. You guys keep on interacting with the JCVD moron, you should stop. If you entertain clowns like that you embolden them.
Click to expand...

I ridicule vaaldumb, I don’t interact.
 
Ferrari 676 (2024 car): narrower F1 transmission system for a larger diffuser: https://scuderiafans.com/ferrari-676-2024-car-narrower-f1-transmission-system-for-a-larger-diffuser/

"... According to rumors, the length of the gearbox will not change, so the wheelbase of the 676 will not change substantially compared to the SF-23. However, the effort has been made to gain about 20 mm on each side in width. The advantage will be having a larger diffuser slide, capable of making the car more efficient, which, at least on paper, should generate more downforce with the body, allowing for reduced wing resistance and thus profiles with smaller chords and angles.

The exercise is more complex than it may seem for three reasons: a narrower transmission must achieve the same levels of torsional resistance to avoid stiffness losses that would have a detrimental effect on the car’s handling on the track. Ferrari technicians have set very ambitious goals because it will be possible to achieve a small weight saving associated primarily with an aerodynamic advantage. However, the other significant difficulty is fitting the internal part of the rear suspension.

As previously reported on Motorsport.com, the layout will remain the well-known pull-rod, but the design of the linkages will be completely revised, following some Red Bull concepts (the RB19 is push-rod). We will see more misaligned arms both front and rear, seeking mechanical advantages. In the rear, the upper multilink’s front arm will be decidedly inclined downward to increase the anti-squat effect, while in the front, there will be a reversed design to favor anti-dive, as reported by Motorsport Italy.

What are we talking about? Schemes useful for avoiding excessive nose dive during braking and the equivalent squatting of the rear in acceleration. Stabilizing the behavior of the “box” would mean having a less sensitive Ferrari to changes in ride height from the asphalt, and therefore, with fewer sudden loss of load that harms tire health.

The sidepods will be more sloping, following Red Bull’s dictates, and the radiator inlet will have a narrower frontal section to increase the airflow directed under the side, in a much more flared underfloor compared to that of the SF-23. This is because the lower intrusion cone will be submerged in the bottom and will no longer protrude to disrupt the flow on the curb. ..."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X