South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
So you're saying he just couldn't quite match 44?
Would’ve been more than 48 if it were not for missing a race due to Covid.So you're saying he just couldn't quite match 44?
I have no idea why they would want to put in old drivers that did not make the cut back into F1.
Riciardo, Bottas, Magnussen all had enough time in F1 and did not excel. Can just as well put a promising rookie in. Will get the same results, only the rookie might get better and get you better results.
Same goes for Hulkenberg, Gasly, Ocon. All just average drivers that had enough time to make their mark.
If my grandmother had balls she would have been a bike.Would’ve been more than 48 if it were not for missing a race due to Covid.
Finishes in the points in consecutive races isn't necessarily the same as consecutive finishes in the points but that's just semantics.If my grandmother had balls she would have been a bike.
How would you have consecutive finishes in the points, if not in consecutive races?Finishes in the points in consecutive races isn't necessarily the same as consecutive finishes in the points but that's just semantics.
Consecutive finishes from races entered. Again, semantics.How would you have consecutive finishes in the points, if not in consecutive races?
Yup, a rookie with Bottas would be a good choice imo.I have no idea why they would want to put in old drivers that did not make the cut back into F1.
Riciardo, Bottas, Magnussen all had enough time in F1 and did not excel. Can just as well put a promising rookie in. Will get the same results, only the rookie might get better and get you better results.
Same goes for Hulkenberg, Gasly, Ocon. All just average drivers that had enough time to make their mark.
Imho they'd probably be better off in the beginning with 2 experienced drivers with historical data they can measure and quantify their car's performance against to get a decent baseline.Yup, a rookie with Bottas would be a good choice imo.
Imho they'd probably be better off in the beginning with 2 experienced drivers with historical data they can measure and quantify their car's performance against to get a decent baseline.
I like the fact that a rookie such as a Bortoleto , Hadjar, even Bearman can push and sometimes beat their more experienced team mates and as such keep them on their toes. You still have the experience, but also the hunger of a youngster pushing the limits.Imho they'd probably be better off in the beginning with 2 experienced drivers with historical data they can measure and quantify their car's performance against to get a decent baseline.
Sadly that's what will probably be the defining factor.Yeah agree, less likely to rake up the damage costs than having two rookies.
Sure but they're all in teams in different stages of development and not brand new. Plus, Cadillac with be entering with a Ferrari PU so it'll mostly be design/aero engineering in the beginning and you need as much experience as possible especially those who are able to communicate well.I like the fact that a rookie such as a Bortoleto , Hadjar, even Bearman can push and sometimes beat their more experienced team mates and as such keep them on their toes. You still have the experience, but also the hunger of a youngster pushing the limits.
Sadly that's what will probably be the defining factor.