finally in the showroom

[Splinter]

make a point...

Oh the irony!

 

[Splinter]

nah I think we are done

No, your integrity is done.

 

[saturnz]

No, your integrity is done.

wasn't my integrity done many moons ago? is it only now that its done?

 

[f2wohf]

I’m surprised that he didn’t make a 900% profit on the Opel.

What a business failure!

 

[ShaunSA]

This thread :crylaugh:

 

[Craig_]

no I was in hospital for a week, its all a lie, I mean I was busy posting in the hospital bed shortly after the incident occurred, you remember don't you?

I assume this is sarcasm? Why don't you just say, yes, the claim was for the car. Done and dusted.

 

[ToxicBunny]

wasn't my integrity done many moons ago? is it only now that its done?

Nah its just extra crispy now...

 

[Pitbull]

I assume this is sarcasm? Why don't you just say, yes, the claim was for the car. Done and dusted.

It's not how he rolls. He wants people to guess and he sits on his plastic crate in front of his 386 and says: "Wrong, try again" He's extremely elusive, never answers questions outright, or answers a question with a question. He's dishonest as fark!

 

[f2wohf]

It's not how he rolls. He wants people to guess and he sits on his plastic crate in front of his 386 and says: "Wrong, try again" He's extremely illusive, never answers questions outright, or answers a question with a question. He's dishonest as fark!

Elusive I guess?

 

[Pitbull]

Elusive I guess?

apologies, spell check, you are correct

 

[f2wohf]

apologies, spell check, you are correct

I was afraid you fell on your head and considered saturnz as illusive. :crylaugh:

 

[saturnz]

I assume this is sarcasm? Why don't you just say, yes, the claim was for the car. Done and dusted.

I'm responding to a guy who has been described by another forum member as someone who argues something is red when it is actually blue, and you are questioning my sarcasm?

 

[ToxicBunny]

I'm responding to a guy who has been described by another forum member as someone who argues something is red when it is actually blue, and you are questioning my sarcasm?

So still no straight answer then

 

[Craig_]

I assume this is sarcasm? Why don't you just say, yes, the claim was for the car. Done and dusted.

I'm responding to a guy who has been described by another forum member as someone who argues something is red when it is actually blue, and you are questioning my sarcasm?

Maybe respond to me then?

 

[Splinter]

I'm responding to a guy who has been described by another forum member as someone who argues something is red when it is actually blue, and you are questioning my sarcasm?

Instead of telling us what other people have said, why don't you carry on with your lies and entertain us all

 

[saturnz]

So still no straight answer then

wheres the fun in that with you being the expert at reading whats implied

 

[saturnz]

Maybe respond to me then?

I've responded with this response

 

[Craig_]

I've responded with this response

I have no idea what you are saying, maybe it will be easier if you just say if that claim was for the car, or for something else.

I've colour coded it, so you can just answer either red, or blue. Very easy and straight forward. If you answer that I think most other questions will be moot.

 

[saturnz]

I have no idea what you are saying, maybe it will be easier if you just say if that claim was for the car, or for something else.

I've colour coded it, so you can just answer either red, or blue. Very easy and straight forward. If you answer that I think most other questions will be moot.

why is it important, once that question is answered, another question will be asked, and so on and so on...

I've explicitly stated what the damages was for, but you feel the need to ask a question and insist I answer it

 

[ToxicBunny]

wheres the fun in that with you being the expert at reading whats implied

Don’t really need to be an expert... just vaguely competent in English