Finally Obama condemns Iran thugs

What is wrong about the protests in Iran though? Republicans seem offended by them.. :rolleyes:

The title suggests that Obama was just sitting around ignoring Iran.. unlike Bush, Obama has advisers with actual evidence and this is how he makes his decisions not on impulse.

Alan said:
Um because African tyrants are nowhere near the international threat that Iran is.
Click to expand...

oh yeah... that somali privacy thingy hardly made the news recently.
 
Last edited:
Since when did the US start reacting to international threats as opposed to their age old motto of "We have no friends, America only has interests".
 
Aqua_lung said:
What is wrong about the protests in Iran though? Republicans seem offended by them.. :rolleyes:

The title suggests that Obama was just sitting around ignoring Iran.. unlike Bush, Obama has advisers with actual evidence and this is how he makes his decisions not on impulse.

oh yeah... that somali privacy thingy hardly made the news recently.
Click to expand...

Youtube Neda and see for yourself. How many protesters murdered 17? Nothing wrong there :erm:

Yeah imagine if Dubya was still around. All those horrible, nasty things he's be calling poor glowing Ahemi right about now. All those videos, photos of abuse and murder is clearly not evidence :o


larrychang said:
Since when did the US start reacting to international threats as opposed to their age old motto of "We have no friends, America only has interests".
Click to expand...

What were their interests in Vietnam again? Oh yes that vital rice resource.
 
Alan said:
Youtube Neda and see for yourself. How many protesters murdered 17? Nothing wrong there :erm:

Yeah imagine if Dubya was still around. All those horrible, nasty things he's be calling poor glowing Ahemi right about now. All those videos, photos of abuse and murder is clearly not evidence :o




What were their interests in Vietnam again? Oh yes that vital rice resource.
Click to expand...

Err, the fear of communism?
 
Balstrome said:
I would rather be called a fool, hawk, warmonger and find no nukes (aka bush) than be called Neville Chamberlain and have another holocaust.
Click to expand...

This is not the 1930's... oh wait you want to drag the world into that age instead :rolleyes:
 
Aqua_lung said:
This is not the 1930's... oh wait you want to drag the world into that age instead :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. :o

People of your ilk literally did almost drag mankind into the dark ages in the 30's :erm:


killadoob said:
Gosh alan i am surprized your asking me for this, it was all the news days before they invaded.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2247914.stm

I will find you more if you need.
Click to expand...

Nowhere there does the U.S claim Iraq had nukes
 
killadoob said:
Gosh alan i am surprized your asking me for this, it was all the news days/weeks/months before they invaded.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2247914.stm
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB80/

I will find you more if you need.

1500 people to find nukes bwhahahaha what a load of hogwash the US spewed to the world in order to attack.
Click to expand...

I proved that Saddam allowed Blix to inspect Iraq to prevent the war and Blix said there was no case for war but he still insists this did not happen even when presented with all the evidence. :rolleyes:
 
Aqua_lung said:
I proved that Saddam allowed Blix to inspect Iraq to prevent the war and Blix said there was no case for war but he still insists this did not happen even when presented with all the evidence. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

ROFL your own link you supplied claimed he wasn't allowing them to do their job. Then again you like Killa confuse claiming somebody 'wants a nuke' is the same as claiming somebody 'has a nuke'
 
"We cannot stand by and do nothing. We should do everything we can to stop him using the weapons he has got and the weapons he wants," Mr Blair is expected to say, describing Saddam Hussein as an "international outlaw".

You must read, they wanted to stop because of the weapons he had and wanted. Read alan my boy read :).
 
killadoob said:
"We cannot stand by and do nothing. We should do everything we can to stop him using the weapons he has got and the weapons he wants," Mr Blair is expected to say, describing Saddam Hussein as an "international outlaw".

You must read, they wanted to stop because of the weapons he had and wanted. Read alan my boy read :).
Click to expand...

Those weren't nukes ffs. They thought he had biological and chemical weapons while wanting in the future nuclear weapons. If they thought he had actual nukes they would have never invaded :erm: Think nuclear bomb + scud + Tel Aviv or Kuwait city = no chance in hell of invasion

Nowhere have you provided any link that directly states a U.S official staying he had nuclear weapons
 
So the US thought he wanted nukes and have biological and chemical weapons.

So are you saying that the US was right? they found nothing indicating iraq wanted nukes nor did they find any biological or chemical weapons.

So what exactly is your point here?

I have shown you that the reason they attacked had to do with nuclear weapons, what do you not understand about that? Regardless of whether they had 100 or none, the US claimed iraq could build one within months but yet they found nothing suggesting that was even remotely true.

http://www.iraqsnuclearmirage.com/YellowTimes/Cheneys_Bogus_Nuclear_Weapon.htm

DICK cheney reckoned he could prove iraq has nuclear elements left :p, strange he never proved it.
 
Last edited:
You don't seem to get there is a massive difference between having nukes and only wanting them. Your claim that they said Iraq had nukes is fundamentally wrong. It changes everything.
 
And the only WMDs Saddam had were those the US donated to fight Iran.. so of course he had weapons they gave it to him.
 
Mr. Obama made a mistake to say those things ... our question is why he fell into this trap and said things that previously (former U.S. President George W.) Bush used to say," the semi-official Fars News Agency quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.

"Do you want to speak (with Iran) with this tone? If that is your stance then what is left to talk about," said Ahmadinejad. "I hope you avoid interfering in Iran's affairs and express your regret in a way that the Iranian nation is informed of it."
Click to expand...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529022,00.html

Eish that's not going to go down well :erm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X