South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
But of course.lilDeath said:hey Bwana, aint Safari cool too??![]()
I wonder if they'll be able to make it secure. Internet Explorer has been horribly insecure for TEN YEARS now (yes, it's ten years this year that IE users have been basically constantly highly vulnerable). So I have strong doubts that they're either interested or capable of making it even relatively secure (yeah yeah I know 100% security is a myth, but it's like crime, there's a huge difference between, say, living in SA and living in the UK in your 'risk profile'). Given how much time and (trainloads of) money they've been given now to fix it, it's disgusting that they haven't bothered. I'm sure IE will remain the number one entry point for spyware and other malware for many years to come. I'm sick of doing the "free Microsoft support work" that I'm sure many of us here do of cleaning the malware off family/friends' PCs, I'm grateful that Firefox market share is now large enough that I can install it on their systems.lilDeath said:MS doing good things with their new IE7 browser too
![]()
I'm not questioning that you're having problems with FF, but considering that millions of people use it all the time without any crashes (including myself, I use it every single day, a lot), perhaps it's not necessarily Firefox that is "the SUCK" in your situation? I've been using Mozilla/Gecko/Firefox (previously the Mozilla browser but more recently Firefox) for over five years (since before Mozilla 0.8) and on many different computers and in all that time every single release has always been FAR more stable than IE.Jeeva said:Firefox is the SUCK! I crashes like 3-5 times a month. Rather use Seamonkey or Opera.
There is some truth to that, but in this case I think it only plays a small part; Firstly, Internet Explorer has always been the most insecure browser since even when it had the tiniest market share (I've been using the web since 1995 but most people here probably don't remember or realise that back then Netscape had over 80% market share). Secondly, there are just some fundamental problems with the the way "security" in Internet Explorer works (e.g. ActiveX). I recall security experts were already publicly denouncing it as a bad design practically the day Microsoft first released/announced it - with Java rising as a possible threat, Microsoft needed an object model fast to allow developers to create active content embedded in web pages, they had nothing, so they just grabbed ActiveX which was never intended for such networked environments and shoved it into IE, claimed that their "trust" model was superior to Java's "sandbox" model, but probably full well knowing it would be a disaster (and it was).lilDeath said:However, it is logical that the program / company with the highest market penetration will be susceptible to more attacks /attempts, thus leading to more vulnerabilities.