Perfect!
What i would like to know is this:
I am starting my own IT company next year doing end user on-site support, and will be running it from where I live. Now, where I live is a built on home onto my father-in-laws place. So what I would like to know is, do I charge my company rent, or does he? And how does this correlate to the whole tax process?
Any info would be appreciated.
Thank you for your reply Greg.
No proprietory systems will be sold. Will be doing support, using products and software from third-parties.
I will be using my office only as my workplace, so nothing else in the house will be used for business. Plus, we don't pay rent at all. It was a wedding gift from my in-laws. So we are living there rent, electricity, and water free. With my situation, do I even need to charge for rent? Seeing as that we don't pay? Or will this situation make it that the company will have to pay my father-in-law, as he is the owner of the property.
Hi Greg,
I have a bit of a silly question and I don't know whether there's a satisfactory answer. I'm working for a company that implements large systems, which means I spend a good amount of time at the client's premises. I'm a normal, salaried worker and registered at SARS as such, if I am not mistaken. I'm currently spending around R2 000 per month on petrol, excluding other costs. The company has given me a phone to use and all of that, but the travel costs is considered travel to my place of work, so I have to foot the bill there.
Anyway, I'm not feeling particularly patriotic, and would like to end up paying less tax. I don't have a RA or any other such deductibles. Medical aid goes off of my wife's salary. Is there a way I can deduct travel and/or any other costs? If it's purely administrative in nature, the company I work for should be plenty accommodating.
A previous company I worked for had some finance guys work technical wizardry and they ended up claiming large amounts back from SARS due to them being "contractors" or some such, although they were permanently employed. I'm not a finance guy, however, so I don't know these tricks. Could you maybe point me in the right direction?
Ah Travel allowances.
A very nice topic indeed.The wizard you speak of is a tax man who knows what he is doing as do I and I will attempt to help you in this regard
Answering your first question.SARS recognises travel allowances being from the place of business A to place of business B, certain fuel,and maitenance costs depending on whether you were given a company car etc
So in essence ,you cannot claim travel allowances if you travel from home to work,only from work to a client
You can understand that contractors,do alot of travelling.
Many allowances may be given here depending on your company and the payroll but I will give some ideas as to how they got so many
One the company gave a company car to the contractor,and the contractor bared the maintenance and fuel costs,all deductible using a special table relevent to business km travelled based on the value of the vehicle
Or if you travelled in your own car,you may claim the business km portion back at a certain given rate.
There are countless scenarios and very hard to identify on your situation, but it is recommended that you read the following link
http://pghaccountants.co.za/travel-allowance-for-20122013-tax-year/
Ask me questions if you need clarification, and enquire to your company whether they do allow travel allowances.
IF they do get yourself a little note book,and note the km you travel for all business purposes to clients,etc
and start claiming my friend.
Keep in mind,that yes you are getting travel allowances that are in essence added back onto your payroll,ie more salary to compensate your cost,but in the end,SARS are not stupid in any way. You are not getting any profit from it,even though it does feel like you are. They are there to attempt to par you off,and cover your expenses,not for you to profit off of it.Previously this was a hot subject and grossly misused by taxpayers,hence why it is so tight now.
You should however if you do any travel be reimbursed for your travels,but if you do this note the kms. It is not your responsibility unless under your contract that you not be reimbursed,but in practice we know that fighting with your company to pay you back on travel can be a very harmful to your image,so tread lightly
Great stuff, thanks. Would my home qualify as a "place of employment" if I were to work from home? I get reimbursed for company travel already by means of logging distance travelled. The bit where I want to save is with regards to travel from my home. I'm just spit-balling here, so if it's not possible to make such deductions, that's fine.
I see you are based in Randburg and I assume you are a tax consultant? I wouldn't mind discussing things within more detail with you to see whether there is any playroom available. I suspect that there isn't much, however.
Very clever question. Here it is important to define a few certain things that will make things a tad clearer
One under what I understand,you dont have your own business,you do work for an employer you just do your work at home.In this case no,as in your contract,it states that your place of employment is the offices or wherever your offices are,so just make sure according to your contract if this is the case.
If you do have your own business then you may define the place(your home) as ''place of employment'',pay yourself fringe benefit to the payroll for the travel allowance(assuming you kept a log book),if you travel from your home(place of employment defined) to a client.
A nice tip,would be to buy a vehicle under your companies account,give the right of use of vehicle to yourself,and pay the fringe benefit to you as a personal capacity,and have the company pay according to the tables defined for maintenance and fuel,and ofcourse business km travel at all times keeping in MIND not PERSONAL km,only BUSINESS KM.So fetching children from your home/business is not claimable so becareful here.
Hi Greg C
I refer to the table in that article regarding the Fixed cost, Fuel cost and Maintenance cost.
Do you claim all three of them or do you choose between Fixed cost and Fuel/Maintenace cost ?
My situation is as follows:
Value of vehicle is less than R 60 000. ( My own vehicle, not a company car)
More that 80% of the use of the vehicle is for business purposes.
I travel less than 8000 km per year.
Currently a get a flat salary package, no allowances etc.
My plan is to restructure my salary as follows: Fixed Cost = R 19 492 / 12 = R 1 624 per month.
Because more that 80% of my travel is for business purposes, only 20% of the allowance is taxable.
20% x R 1 624 = R 325. I can then lower my taxable salary by R 1 299 ( 80% of the allowance) and thus pay less PAYE.
From the first sentence in that article:
where no records of actual costs are kept are determined by using the following table.
I take that to mean I do not have to keep a log book. Is that correct ?
Am I understanding all of this correctly ?
Thanks for your time.
O and to answer your questions directly,that blow your attempted calculation out of the water so to speak(no offence ofcourse)
Percentage of business travel means nothing to sars. Its kind of like saying to your lecturer I received about 50% for my test... DID YOU FAIL? or did you pass,I need an exact amount.
You must at all times keep a log book for business km travelled preferably,total km travelled as well.
Otherwise you can see its an amount for fuel and maintenance per km, how do you multiple for a percentage of nothing travelled?
Anyway,not looking to embarras you just trying to help. Keep a log book,of business travelled and total km travelled.
And secondly an allowance will not and I repeat WILL NOT ''less PAYE''.
It is a fringe benefit,meaning you will pay it generally and the company will refund you to the SAME state as you were before.That is the objective,not to profit off it by reducing PAYE.
If no records are kept,no travel allowance can be claimed.
Hope this helps,let me know if anything is unclear.
Understood and not offended.
Not sure if I agree with the bolded part. Surely if you can split your salary into two components:
"salary" and "allowance" and you can make the allowance component "not taxable" or "partially taxable" you can "score" on PAYE. If you can have an agreement with your employer that says something like:
Instead of paying me R 10 000 salary, just pay R 8000 salary and R 2000 for a travel allowance.
Have a look here...
Reimbursive Payments - Since March, 1999 - where an employee receives a Travel Allowance and/or any of the employee's vehicle expenses are paid by the employer, all Reimbursive Travel Payments based on kms travelled will be taxed as though it was a Travel Allowance (regardless of rate and distance claimed). Thus, 60% of reimbursive travel expenses will be taxed. Where the employee has no Travel Allowance and no vehicle expenses are paid by the employer, the full amount of the reimbusive payment is non-taxable UNLESS the rate paid per kilometre exceeds R2.92 OR the annual distance travelled exceeds 8000km in which case the full reimbursive amount is taxable income.
Have to go, will be back later...
Pity that quote is outdated.
Under reimbursive allowance I have yet to come accross 60% or anything relating to this percentage for the 2013 tax year.
The R2.92 is R3.05 just to prove that the above is out of date,The limitation of 8000kms has not changed.
Under your scenario you are attempting to seperate the salary components into a salary and an allowance.
The allowance ie Travel allowances,is a fringe benefit. Included in a persons gross income and affects an individuals Taxable income.I am very confused on what tax calculation you or the payroll systems nowdays do that seperates it.It will eventually be taxed but not taxed or dealt with on a seperate basis.
Section 8(1)(a)(i) allowance or advance (except any portion thereof expended for specified purposes) in the case of travel allowances,subsistance allowances,allowances for holding public office is to be INCLUDED in taxable income.
Pity that quote is outdated.
Under reimbursive allowance I have yet to come accross 60% or anything relating to this percentage for the 2013 tax year.
The R2.92 is R3.05 just to prove that the above is out of date,The limitation of 8000kms has not changed.
Under your scenario you are attempting to seperate the salary components into a salary and an allowance.
The allowance ie Travel allowances,is a fringe benefit. Included in a persons gross income and affects an individuals Taxable income.I am very confused on what tax calculation you or the payroll systems nowdays do that seperates it.It will eventually be taxed but not taxed or dealt with on a seperate basis.
Section 8(1)(a)(i) allowance or advance (except any portion thereof expended for specified purposes) in the case of travel allowances,subsistance allowances,allowances for holding public office is to be INCLUDED in taxable income.
Alternatively:
At the option of the employee, where the distance travelled for business purposes does not exceed 8000 kilometers per annum, no tax is payable on an allowance paid by an employer to an employe, up to the rate of 316 cents per kilometre, regardless of the value of the vehicle.
At the option of the employee, where the distance travelled for business purposes does not exceed 8000 kilometers per annum, no tax is payable on an allowance paid by an employer to an employee, up to the rate of 316 cents per kilometre, regardless of the value of the vehicle.
Instead of paying me R 10 000 salary, just pay R 8000 salary and R 2000 for a travel allowance.
Either way you look at the above the 10 000 salary is gross Income
or you can have
Salary R8000
Fringe benefit:Travel allowance R2000
It still gets taxed either way