Grant
Honorary Master
Nothing screams "loser" louder than parading around with a status symbol on your arm - that you stole from a store.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Nothing screams "loser" louder than parading around with a status symbol on your arm - that you stole from a store.
You are just an intolerant bigot and hater of "losers" and "joggers". Expect to be shipped off to re-education school where these intolerant dog whistles will be treated.Nothing screams "loser" louder than parading around with a status symbol on your arm - that you stole from a store.
What change was ushered in with the previous police brutality instances?
So you think you should be allowed to call your boss a d**s to his face because "Freedom of speech"?Now this is just stupid. Do you understand the meaning of freedom or do you have freedom to murder someone as long as you face the consequences thereof.
For all we know this police officer was practicing anti-racism and doing exactly what the "decent people" promote... i.e. the officer discriminated based on race.
Of course! That is how you can fire stupid employees. Promote freedom and those that cannot handle freedom get rekt.So you think you should be allowed to call your boss a d**s to his face because "Freedom of speech"?
You have no clue what you are talking about and engaging in libel.Ah, our local right winger who is apparently against authoritarianism but loves it when the police lock up journalists.
lible.
Damn that was easy and predictableLmao
Just for the dumb Trumptard trolls.
![]()
Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms steps into national spotlight with passionate plea to protesters
Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms stepped into the national spotlight on Friday night, denouncing vandalism in her city as "chaos" after demonstrations over the death of George Floyd, who was pinned down by a Minneapolis police officer now charged with his murder, turned violent and destructive.www.cnn.com
Maybe if you were more lucid , or provided an example of the claim you make.But insinuations are A-OK, right, Jabs?
Maybe if you were more lucid , or provided an example of the claim you make.
The new media narrative being peddled is that "white supremacists" have infiltrated the social justice warriors and doing damage.Are the MAGA people doing the damage in Atlanta?
The new media narrative being peddled is that "white supremacists" have infiltrated the social justice warriors.
Is there nothing these "white supremacists" can't do? I am beginning to think Fake News media want to paint these "white supremacists" as ..... supreme.And working alongside the BLM peeps to loot stores and break stuff.
cunning plan
But the police in fact enjoy a degree of legal protection, from a doctrine known as “qualified immunity.”
Federal law gives Americans the right to sue government officials who violate their constitutional rights. But in Pierson v Ray, decided in 1967, the Supreme Court held that public officials who commit “good faith” rights violations are entitled to “qualified immunity”, intended to shield them against frivolous lawsuits.
As the Supreme Court explained in 2015, that means that government employees cannot be sued for actions undertaken in the course of their duties, “so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known”. That sounds sensible enough—but over time the “clearly established” part of the doctrine has almost completely subsumed the “reasonable person” part.
For instance, on September 10th 2013 police officers in Fresno, California searched the homes and business of two men suspected of running an illegal gambling operation. The men allege that police seized $151,380 in cash and another $125,000 worth of rare coins—but only reported taking $50,000, and pocketed the rest. The men sued, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the case.
The court held that it need not determine whether the men’s constitutional rights had been violated—ie, in this case whether the officers actually had stolen the property in question, which would have breached the Fourth Amendment, which promises protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Because “there was no clearly established law holding that officers violate the Fourth or Fourteenth Amendment when they steal property that is seized pursuant to a warrant”, the two men were not entitled to relief (though the court noted, near the end of its brief ruling, “we sympathise with the Appellants”).
Or consider the case of Malaika Brooks, who was seven months pregnant, and whom police dragged from her car in front of her 11-year-old son, and tasered three times in less than a minute—because she declined to sign a traffic ticket. A panel of federal judges ruled that even though Ms Brooks’s violation--driving 12 miles per hour over the speed limit—was “not serious,” and she did not pose “even a potential threat” to anyone’s safety, the officers’ actions did not violate “clearly established” law. Small wonder that Sonia Sotomayor, the Supreme Court’s most ardent Fourth Amendment champion, called qualified immunity, as most courts have come to interpret it, “an absolute shield for law-enforcement officers, gutting the deterrent effect of the Fourth Amendment.”
Is there nothing these "white supremacists" can't do? I am beginning to think Fake News media want to paint these "white supremacists" as ..... supreme.
Now that I think about it, probably the best way to get these partisan race hustling trolls to fight the good fight against the shitty financial system is to say that the financial system is actually run by white supremacists. Booo!
What about the Goyim? You haven't mentioned them for a while, I'm worried about you.The new media narrative being peddled is that "white supremacists" have infiltrated the social justice warriors and doing damage.