GTX 960 vs R9 380

Base clock for the Galax 970 is 1164Mhz (1317Mhz with boost) - R5400.00
Base clock for the EVGA 970 is 1050Mhz (1178Mhz with boost) - R5700.00

To be fair, the price difference looks more up to Wootware being more willing to cut the price than Takealot...the non-sale price they both list is within R100 of each other.
 
Base clock for the Galax 970 is 1164Mhz (1317Mhz with boost) - R5400.00
Base clock for the EVGA 970 is 1050Mhz (1178Mhz with boost) - R5700.00

To be fair, the price difference looks more up to Wootware being more willing to cut the price than Takealot...the non-sale price they both list is within R100 of each other.

Understood. Im saying the EVGA was available for 5k
 
Was going to ask you if you could stretch your budget to 5k. Takealot had one today for 5k, excellent card.

I could, but I really want to save some cash so that I can upgrade other components. They do have an R9 380 Gigabyte G1 Gaming 4GB which is going for R3999 at the moment. I think I might order it today.

The next cheapest one I am considering is the MSI Twin Frozr 4GB for about R4100.
 
I could, but I really want to save some cash so that I can upgrade other components. They do have an R9 380 Gigabyte G1 Gaming 4GB which is going for R3999 at the moment. I think I might order it today.

The next cheapest one I am considering is the MSI Twin Frozr 4GB for about R4100.

Using a Gigaybyte R7 260X OC edition for over a year now and it's running flawlessly. It's super quiet in the day to day ops but during gaming it can get hot, as hot as my Gainward 550Ti.

Oh and I've never had an AMD driver issue for the past year.
 
Bought a 960 due to the lower power consumption and because it works better better with older generation CPU's.

(2 betters, must be better :p)
Anyways, proof of that?
I would actually assume the R9 380 to be better than the GTX960 due to better support for DirectX12, whereby the CPU can be skipped for queuing graphics.

The R9 380 would be a better buy for future proofing.

(Am currently running 2x R9 280X (desktop), and a GTX960M (laptop), so am not a fan boy, just reading up on all the cards.)

Interesting reads: http://www.techspot.com/review/1081-dx11-vs-dx12-ashes/page6.html
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ashes...ials/Benchmark-DirectX-12-DirectX-11-1167997/ (Sorry, it's in German, just translate the page)
 
I had a similar question a few months back, 970 / 960 or 380 and I went with the 380, haven't had any issues with it and am happy with my decision. Will see how Fallout 4 runs though :D :D
 
I am also in the market for a new gpu but was looking at the gtx 970 or the r9 390. Any advise on either of these cards
 
I had a similar question a few months back, 970 / 960 or 380 and I went with the 380, haven't had any issues with it and am happy with my decision. Will see how Fallout 4 runs though :D :D

Fallout 4 is one of the reasons I am upgrading my card. I think it should run fine at 1080p since the recommended card is the R9 290X 4GB or equivalent. I don't mind if games run at lower than ultra settings but I do hope it will last a couple years before games have to run at low.
 
(2 betters, must be better :p)
Anyways, proof of that?
I would actually assume the R9 380 to be better than the GTX960 due to better support for DirectX12, whereby the CPU can be skipped for queuing graphics.

Maybe not answering the question but amd drivers have a higher cpu overhead than nvidia ones and that's why amd gpus perform better with intel cpus due to the higher performance per thread.


(Am currently running 2x R9 280X (desktop), and a GTX960M (laptop), so am not a fan boy, just reading up on all the cards.)

Interesting reads: http://www.techspot.com/review/1081-...hes/page6.html
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ashes-...tX-11-1167997/ (Sorry, it's in German, just translate the page)

With dx12 & multi-gpu pooling one seems to get better performance when combining amd+nvidia vs a pure xfire or sli setup.
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/2...nstrates-nvidia-amd-gpus-working-side-by-side

This is really gonna fsck with fanboys :D

Interesting times ahead...
 
Last edited:
Maybe not answering the question but amd drivers have a higher cpu overhead than nvidia ones and that's why amd gpus perform better with intel cpus due to the higher performance per thread.

Not with DirectX12 anymore though I would think?
Hopefully we will see more/quicker Dx12 adoption soon.
 
Not with DirectX12 anymore though I would think?
Hopefully we will see more/quicker Dx12 adoption soon.

Think it was DX11, unfortunately we don't have any DX12 games yet.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-why-directx-12-is-a-gamechanger
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-ashes-of-the-singularity-dx12-benchmark-tested

When DX12 does hit current gen amd gpus are gonna perform better than current gen nvidia gpus, not sure what future greenland (arctic islands) & kepler have in store.
 
Last edited:
Think it was DX11, unfortunately we don't have any DX12 games yet.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-why-directx-12-is-a-gamechanger
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-ashes-of-the-singularity-dx12-benchmark-tested

When DX12 does hit current gen amd gpus are gonna perform better than current gen nvidia gpus, not sure what future greenland (arctic islands) & kepler have in store.

Yep, but for now AMD is better if you are planning ahead for Dx12.
The new nvidia cards are coming out what time next year?
 
[video=youtube;15wOp7_dD8E]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15wOp7_dD8E[/video]
 
The R9 380X is rumoured to be released this week, no idea how much truth there is to this.
 
The R9 380X is rumoured to be released this week, no idea how much truth there is to this.

Hmmm... Time to upgrade my R9 280X. I hope it is true since the sales season is about to strike North America. Going to have a close look on the Black sales.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X