The one thing that hasnt been mentioned yet though is that from Vodacom's and MTN's point of view, we entered into these contracts knowingly. I agree that the service is aweful(apart from V3G), they are raping us for every cent they can get, passing all the business risk to the consumer, not delivering on promises, selling a (mostly) unusable connection etc etc etc. But we knowingly entered into agreements which allowed them to do this. Executives are smiling, whilst the consumer is lubricating for the next big shove - but thats just the way big business works in SA - because we allow them to... Well no more I tell you!
To set the record straight though, I voted for rollover without expiry because by anus is eina - but I woud much prefer an uncapped broadband option (live in hope, die in despair). I recently moved back to SA from UK and cannot believe what a shockingly aweful internet market ICASA/TELKOM have allowed to be created.
It seems to me though that in order for Vodacom to justify the spend on doubling their bandwidth costs (still dont understand why this is necessary to roll over bundles) they would need to be able to guarantee that no uncapped wireless option will become available in the near future as this would become a major risk to their broadband model and a clear way for a competitor to take control of the HSDPA market with an uncapped offering. Its a case of who wants to take the risk first - MTN or Vodacom. And we all know that Vodacom are risk averse - just look at the current offering. They will not accept the risk of data bundle rollover, they pass that on to you and I. My point - I think the sooner we get data bundle rollover, the later we get uncapped offering. I would be petitioning for uncapped and use rollover as a negotiaing point if that doesnt work! If they give the consumer neither, then they do not deserve any of our business!