Hawks confirm another explosive device in Durban

My opinion is that's it's a small religious group known for terrorist type activities targeting places such as woolies.

The thing is, one of these devices was planted outside a religious building of one of these "religious group known for terrorist type activities" :whistle:
 
Still doesn't change my opinion : whistle:

You could very well be correct. They are very fractured too with culture against culture (tribal wars). The middle east is full of wars because of that.
 
I think what we are seeing was something many people have predicted over the years: that "melt down" in law and order, when grievences turn from mere protests and brick throwing to more more serious terrorist attacks.

My personal feeling, one can draw a correlation between the terrorism of apartheid and what we are seeing now. There are some out there that perhaps feel that the only way to cure corruption is destruction; that these bombs are a message to the ANC of "things to come" if they continue down this land process against the Zulu's.

I think you and I and the ANC horribly underestimate what is to come if they annexe Zulu territory. We will have war.

Putting bombs in public places, this can never be accepted or even tolerated not in any way, shape nor form and something like this must be stamped out hard and with severe force or this will get worse.

Who were the prior occupants of 'Zulu terrority'? Did the Zulus perhaps take it from someone else? According to my Sotho domestic, the Zulus have never been good neighbours. I once met a white guy who lived in KZN, and disagreed vigorously with her viewpoint: he was killed by a Zulu, maliciously - as opposed to accidentally.
 
Who were the prior occupants of 'Zulu terrority'? Did the Zulus perhaps take it from someone else? According to my Sotho domestic, the Zulus have never been good neighbours. I once met a white guy who lived in KZN, and disagreed vigorously with her viewpoint: he was killed by a Zulu, maliciously - as opposed to accidentally.

I once met a white guy that thought he was superior to the blacks.....
 
You could very well be correct. They are very fractured too with culture against culture (tribal wars). The middle east is full of wars because of that.

I once looked into the origin of the disagreement between the Shia and the Sunni muslims. It was apparently a dispute over who was Mohammad's successor. I assumed that money and/or power was the underlying issue.

You can find similar disagreements within Christianity of course. And no doubt there are semitic sects too. And any other religions you can name. I wonder if there is even one that has not had some sort of division? Can anyone name one?
 
I once looked into the origin of the disagreement between the Shia and the Sunni muslims. It was apparently a dispute over who was Mohammad's successor. I assumed that money and/or power was the underlying issue.

You can find similar disagreements within Christianity of course. And no doubt there are semitic sects too. And any other religions you can name. I wonder if there is even one that has not had some sort of division? Can anyone name one?

Off top of my head I would have to say the Native American beliefs or religion if you can call it that. I don't recall them ever going war against each other or fighting over their deities or interpretations of spirituality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_religion
 
Off top of my head I would have to say the Native American beliefs or religion if you can call it that. I don't recall them ever going war against each other or fighting over their deities or interpretations of spirituality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_religion

Thank you for the reference. It is obviously not complete by a long shot, but as you say there is no indication of inter faith rivalries. The mention of the banning of the religions could point to them being unified by that oppression.

A distinct possible!!
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X