Help me decide networking equipment

rorz0r

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
7,968
Reaction score
188
Location
JHB
So firstly my motivation for spending a bit more than the usual 1k or so spent on a home network. I've used mainly Linksys, netgear and tp-link "home" equipment previously. Now it seems that one wifi AP is not really enough to cover my house adequately to even be able to connect, never mind actually transfer at a decent speed.

My current setup involves 1 adsl router in the lounge (with 3 ports used for other devices) connected to another AP upstairs (connecting lounge, bedroom, other room, server) and this in turn connects to another AP in the bedroom.

The lounge and bedroom are at opposite ends of the house so I generally use those to connect to wifi. I find though that I often have to "switch" manually because when walking through the house my phone will stay connected to the "far" AP and then it doesn't work so well and it's a pain. I tried setting AP's to the same SSID's but this didn't work well either, it just means I lost control of which AP I'm actually connecting to, and even got confusing as it would show 5 bars in a scan but actually be connected to the far one at 1 bar etc. I've also tried WDS and besides the obvious compromises on performance it wasn't at all stable and was impossible to diagnose where the problem was. The current routers also often just have the wifi part "die" when I'm copying files across the network. Sometimes I find they just aren't working as they should. The maximum I can ever copy files seems to be about 5MB/s even with 1 device right next to a router connecting at 150Mb/s+ and the other pc connected via gigabit Ethernet. I think part of the problem is that if a single router is 99% up then a single device networks works 99% of the time but with 3 then the network only works 97% of the time. I usually have to reset a router once a day. I've tried alternative firmwares as well and it hasn't really been successful.

Current devices requiring wired connectivity:
TV
Roku * 2
Desktop
AVR
DVD player
Alarm
Server

And Wireless:
Laptop * 2
Phones * 4
Printer
Tablet

So I've been looking to get something more reliable, as in you plug it in, set it up and never touch the thing again. For wifi purposes the ubiquiti UniFi range looks like a good option, because basically what I want is just one "network" to connect to. The pro AP is rather pricy but the baby one and the long range one aren't too bad, but limited to 100Mb Ethernet which I think I could deal with, as it would probably still give double the throughput I'm getting now. Unfortunately their UniFi AP's don't also provide at least a 4 port switch as it wouldn't make much sense in the ceiling.

I definitely want to move my adsl line, router, ups and server to "upstairs" as there is already a convenient cupboard there and it is quite central so I figured a toughswitch pro poe would be good here as I could run it, the server and the adsl router off the ups (and probably get another separate ups for the server later) and then it could power the AP's so I'd still have wifi+plex when the electricity goes off. As a side effect it would make it easier to plug our printer/scanner/(fax) into the phone line so it could be used to fax (there's always that ONE place that wants you to fax them).

Now I've basically already run out of ports on the "upstairs" central switch so I think an 8 port would be sufficient (2 AP's, 1 server, 1 adsl, 1 bedroom, 1 lounge, 1 alarm, 1 desktop), hence the toughswitch pro poe 8 port. This would then power two UniFi AP's and then I'd need to get other switches for the lounge/bedroom so toughswitch poe (5 ports) would be sufficient.

Rough cost of this setup would be R1100*2 (for APs), R2400 for main switch, R2400 for smaller switches so 7k plus.


All the PoE in the mix is quite a waste as it will only be used for the 2 AP's so I started looking at non PoE gigabit switches and came across the Mikrotik cloud router switches, specifically this one with the AP built in since it's not much more than the non AP model.
http://www.scoopdistribution.co.za/product_info.php/cloud-router-switch-desktop-p-1539

I've played around with mikrotik stuff before. It's definitely more difficult to set up than the average home router but I found it to be "rock solid". That price for just a plain 24 port gigabit switch isn't bad (obviously adding vat/markup). What I figured is maybe I should get that as my upstairs central switch, and see if it goes any better with having the wireless centrally located, and if not disable the built in AP and add two ubiquiti AP's and 2 PoE injectors. I'd prefer to have the other two switches (bedroom and lounge) be the same brand or whatever so maybe just have 2 smaller routerboards (like the 260GS) with a "dumb" configuration, at least to start.

Maybe later on I could get to vlans/tagging/QoS etc. (Basically the server is the download box so it should always be lowest priority, and desktop is gaming so it should always be highest. Browsing and remote desktop/teamviewer etc, streaming should also be highest)


What do you guys think? Stick to Ubiquiti, combine mikrotik and ubiquiti, go with something else, shut the ***** up and just use a normal router like everybody else, spend 3k on a fancy asus router, ???
 
Wall of text too much? Or is it because Friday?
 
You can't touch Mikrotik when it comes to configurability. They make great routers and I would definitely recommend you have a Mikrotik router at the core of your home network. The QOS (called Queues) just works brilliantly, even though it takes quite a bit of setting up.

At home I've got a simple ADSL modem with 1 network port and no wifi connected to my Mikrotik router in bridge mode. The Mikrotik router initiates the PPPOE connection to my ISP. Then connected to the Mikrotik router I have 2 WIFI access points on opposite sides of my house both wired to the Mikrotik router via CAT5 cabling. Works like a charm and my setup never goes down.

Many people combine Ubiquiti AP's with Mikrotik routers, it's a really good setup.
 
Wait, you have 8 devices that need Ethernet.
I think you're complicating things, or you have a lot of cash to burn?

If your house is really that big, I'd suggest first drawing up a blueprint for upstairs and downstairs.
After that, I'd look into placing directional antennas at key points in the house for maximum coverage, instead of two omni's(UniFi APs).

I'd then get a PoE switch and have it play Waldo in the ceiling somewhere(remember heat & humidity).
Daisy-chaining two switches is still going to be cheaper than a L3 16-port one, so I'd take that approach.
I'll suggest going Gigabit, since you've got a lot of multimedia devices.

The core router can be anything really, a Modem & Router device would be the most convenient though.
It doesn't seem that you really need any VLANs, or particular routing. I'd stay away from L3 switches, and complicated routers.

All in all, it really shouldn't be more than 4K for your setup.
 
The core router can be anything really, a Modem & Router device would be the most convenient though.
It doesn't seem that you really need any VLANs, or particular routing. I'd stay away from L3 switches, and complicated routers.

The core router most definitely can't just be anything. It's the single most important piece of equipment in your setup. The router is going to handle QOS, NAT, DHCP, routing, load balancing, redundancy, etc. If you're serious about a home network, which the OP sounds like he is, then nothing less than a Mikrotik router is going to be sufficient for your needs.
 
The core router most definitely can't just be anything. It's the single most important piece of equipment in your setup. The router is going to handle QOS, NAT, DHCP, routing, load balancing, redundancy, etc. If you're serious about a home network, which the OP sounds like he is, then nothing less than a Mikrotik router is going to be sufficient for your needs.

I think you're forgetting the "home" part.

Fancy features are great, but I'm sure as hell not going to be running routing/redundancy protocols in a home network.

Most home-configured routers like TP-Link, Linksys, etc. can handle QOS, NAT & DHCP just fine.
I also love Mikrotik, but it's really not needed unless you're doing Mikrotik-related things.

Edit: Since when do routers do load balancing in a LAN? :wtf:
 
I think you're forgetting the "home" part.

Fancy features are great, but I'm sure as hell not going to be running routing/redundancy protocols in a home network.

Most home-configured routers like TP-Link, Linksys, etc. can handle QOS, NAT & DHCP just fine.
I also love Mikrotik, but it's really not needed unless you're doing Mikrotik-related things.

Edit: Since when do routers do load balancing in a LAN? :wtf:

With a Mikrotik router you can run multiple PPPOE sessions and load balance between them. So you could run two Telkom ADSL lines into your house each with an ADSL Modem connected to your Mikrotik router and then setup load balancing between the 2 connections. You could even connected a 3G modem to your router and load balance between your ADSL line and 3G connection. The possibilities are endless with Mikrotik.

I've never found another router than does QOS as well as Mikrotik does. I can have my torrents running full blast and simultaneously have a crystal clear voice chat on Skype without any problems. The only other router I've found that works almost as well is the Linksys WRT54GL running Tomato.
 
Another cool thing with Mikrotik (I don't work for them, I swear :) ) is that it has very powerful scripting. So you can automate things like updating OpenDNS or Unotelly with your current IP address without having to run annoying apps on your laptop.

Another thing is their firewall. If you use OpenDNS on your network for security reasons you can not only force all users on your network to transparently use OpenDNS's servers without them even knowing, but you can also stop anyone on your network from bypassing OpenDNS by trying to use their own DNS servers. All done at the router level without having to configure anything on anyone's device. So when guests come to visit and use your WIFI you can be assured that they are always using OpenDNS's DNS servers or even Unotelly's DNS servers transparently.

There are very few consumer-grade routers out there that give you these level of configurability, although maybe not every consumer worries about these things!
 
You can't touch Mikrotik when it comes to configurability. They make great routers and I would definitely recommend you have a Mikrotik router at the core of your home network. The QOS (called Queues) just works brilliantly, even though it takes quite a bit of setting up.

At home I've got a simple ADSL modem with 1 network port and no wifi connected to my Mikrotik router in bridge mode. The Mikrotik router initiates the PPPOE connection to my ISP. Then connected to the Mikrotik router I have 2 WIFI access points on opposite sides of my house both wired to the Mikrotik router via CAT5 cabling. Works like a charm and my setup never goes down.

Many people combine Ubiquiti AP's with Mikrotik routers, it's a really good setup.

Yip I'd definitely make the adsl modem/router as dumb as possible and dial the pppoe connection from mikrotik.

Wait, you have 8 devices that need Ethernet.
I think you're complicating things, or you have a lot of cash to burn?

If your house is really that big, I'd suggest first drawing up a blueprint for upstairs and downstairs.
After that, I'd look into placing directional antennas at key points in the house for maximum coverage, instead of two omni's(UniFi APs).

I'd then get a PoE switch and have it play Waldo in the ceiling somewhere(remember heat & humidity).
Daisy-chaining two switches is still going to be cheaper than a L3 16-port one, so I'd take that approach.
I'll suggest going Gigabit, since you've got a lot of multimedia devices.

The core router can be anything really, a Modem & Router device would be the most convenient though.
It doesn't seem that you really need any VLANs, or particular routing. I'd stay away from L3 switches, and complicated routers.

All in all, it really shouldn't be more than 4K for your setup.

To be honest the dvd player, tv are mostly just because they have an ethernet port. The server and 2 rokus would be sufficient for series etc. Then the avr I do use for airplay mostly but it could also do dlna from plex. So those 4 are a "must". The desktop I'd prefer to have wired for minimal lag when gaming and to assist when moving big files etc.

I think you're forgetting the "home" part.

Fancy features are great, but I'm sure as hell not going to be running routing/redundancy protocols in a home network.

Most home-configured routers like TP-Link, Linksys, etc. can handle QOS, NAT & DHCP just fine.
I also love Mikrotik, but it's really not needed unless you're doing Mikrotik-related things.

Edit: Since when do routers do load balancing in a LAN? :wtf:

This is true so any recommendations of switches that are not fancy but will definitely be 100% rock solid would be appreciated. Unfortunately it seems a bit like buying a tv, you can't buy the best display panel without getting "smart" and "3d" and bunch of other stuff you don't need thrown in.
As for QoS on home routers, it generally seems pretty useless to me. NAT is fine since they only have to do this for max 4mb interface. DHCP could be better, it always seems really slow when compared to when I was using a mikrotik router where it was basically instant.

With a Mikrotik router you can run multiple PPPOE sessions and load balance between them. So you could run two Telkom ADSL lines into your house each with an ADSL Modem connected to your Mikrotik router and then setup load balancing between the 2 connections. You could even connected a 3G modem to your router and load balance between your ADSL line and 3G connection. The possibilities are endless with Mikrotik.

I've never found another router than does QOS as well as Mikrotik does. I can have my torrents running full blast and simultaneously have a crystal clear voice chat on Skype without any problems. The only other router I've found that works almost as well is the Linksys WRT54GL running Tomato.

Realistically I wouldn't run 2 adsl lines, they cost enough as is. I could very well do adsl with 3g as backup and at least with routeros managing it I could get notifications, stats, etc or even block torrents while it makes do with 3g etc etc.

Another cool thing with Mikrotik (I don't work for them, I swear :) ) is that it has very powerful scripting. So you can automate things like updating OpenDNS or Unotelly with your current IP address without having to run annoying apps on your laptop.

This would be helpful too. Especially with roku and unotelly every time the electricity goes off the roku boots up before unotelly is updated and then thinks it's in a different region which messes with your channels etc.

Another thing is their firewall. If you use OpenDNS on your network for security reasons you can not only force all users on your network to transparently use OpenDNS's servers without them even knowing, but you can also stop anyone on your network from bypassing OpenDNS by trying to use their own DNS servers. All done at the router level without having to configure anything on anyone's device. So when guests come to visit and use your WIFI you can be assured that they are always using OpenDNS's DNS servers or even Unotelly's DNS servers transparently.

There are very few consumer-grade routers out there that give you these level of configurability, although maybe not every consumer worries about these things!

Nah nothing like that needed. Except for the unotelly bit but then that would apply to the whole network.
 
Another thing is their firewall. If you use OpenDNS on your network for security reasons you can not only force all users on your network to transparently use OpenDNS's servers without them even knowing, but you can also stop anyone on your network from bypassing OpenDNS by trying to use their own DNS servers.
Bypassing DNS restrictions is easy on any device with its own alternavive connection (like 3G). Not going to argue on the main point, just saying that internal network security is not easy matter to deal with (if you are serious about it).
 
QoS is a very important part of a network, but it's generally reserved for environments where multiple devices demand the network at the same time.

In a home network it makes sense if you've got say; Children browsing Youtube, wife watching Netflix and somebody gaming as well. You can prioritize the gaming for latency, while providing more bandwidth to the people streaming content.

What does make QoS more easily configurable is VLANs. But home networks generally do not have enough devices to require grouping.
However, Mikrotik switches with SwOS support some form of VLANs, not sure which. Last one I had was about R450, and supported 1GbE, PoE and a WIC(for that fibre). 5 port however. Tenda also has some very cheap L2 gigabit switches, 5, 8 and 16 port. They don't support PoE.
I saw a Planet GbE PoE switch for cheap on Scoop as well.

Most Mikrotik routers are cost effective, however, mostly everything is proprietry. If you'd like to use the fancy features, expect to fork out fees for a license, and that it'll only work on Mikrotik(hello Cisco).

Most other routers will have support to flash them, and install OpenWRT. That will give you all the configuribility of a Linux server. Some may even be able to run pfSense. Most capable routers(D-Link, Asus) are on par with Mikrotik mid-range price wise.

In all, if you want to experiment, get complicated devices and figure them out(your choice of price range).
If you want a stable home network without breaking the bank, get dumb devices.
 
So an update:

I've moved the adsl modem to upstairs and it's more central now. Also moved my microserver and a ups into the same cupboard so things are already neater.
I've ordered 2 UAP-LR's and given up on the wifi while electricity off requirement as this would mean either running more cable (not going to happen) or buying the "Pro" AP's at more than twice the price and not much additional benefit. I don't want to add more ups's all over the place either.

When I set up the ubiquiti wifi I'll turn off all other wifi and just use what I currently have as "dumb switches" and see how that goes. Keen to replace all those with netgear prosafe switches.

Then it's just a case of dropping in something for QoS so this will most likely be a basic mikrotik board like a 433L. My ADSL modem really sucks at this like port forwarding and it's management interface that only allows one connection at a time (so one connection if you don't click "logout" before changing devices or even if your device changes IP) so will do the pppoe on mikrotik.
 
Then it's just a case of dropping in something for QoS so this will most likely be a basic mikrotik board like a 433L. My ADSL modem really sucks at this like port forwarding and it's management interface that only allows one connection at a time (so one connection if you don't click "logout" before changing devices or even if your device changes IP) so will do the pppoe on mikrotik.

Glad to hear it! The only thing your ADSL modem should be doing is acting as a bridge for PPPOE connections from the Mikrotik router. Everything else should (and can be) better handled by the Mikrotik router.
 
Unifi AP + EdgeMax Lite

I have quite a few wireless devices on my network, and my TP-Link WR-1043ND just wasn't cutting it anymore, so I purchased the Ubiquiti Enterprise UniFi AP, and EdgeMax Lite router. I use this in conjunction with a piece of !@#$ netgear ADSL modem. The EdgeMax initiates the ADSL connection using PPPoE (so that the netgear can't screw anything else up), and everything works like a charm (The netgear still requires a 120mm fan to function correctly). The only time the network has dropped so far, was when there was a power outage.

My only issue with the Unifi AP, is that it is 150Mbps , yet it is limited by a 100Mbps ethernet connection. So theoretically you will only get the fastest speeds when copying between WiFi devices, and not between WiFi and Ethernet. (WTF seriously?)

However I don't recommend this for beginners. If you purchase this setup, be prepared to learn. I had to figure out how to enable TCP MSS clamping to get PPPoE to work correctly. You also have to setup the firewall correctly, otherwise your router will be exposed to everyone on the internet. There are a few wizards, but it doesn't do everything, and you have to do a lot of CLI tweaking yourself.
The UniFi software requires CLI to setup, but once done, it is great, and you can easily manage multiple AP's, and create guest networks. You can also see activity of any user, download/upload, etc.

Another thing I have noticed, QOS is working a lot better on the EdgeMax than the Fortigate 60C I had. I can game whilst another user is watching youtube, or downloading, and still get 10ms ping in game.

I think all in all this is a better purchase than the monster Asus router (which is not an enterprise product), and this has more flexability for you to extend your network.
 
AP's arrived this morning. Will play with them tonight :)

My only issue with the Unifi AP, is that it is 150Mbps , yet it is limited by a 100Mbps ethernet connection. So theoretically you will only get the fastest speeds when copying between WiFi devices, and not between WiFi and Ethernet. (WTF seriously?)

It's actually 300Mbps wifi :p Yeah I don't quite understand it either. Ideally I would get the "pro" or even the AC unit but there's *quite* a price jump there and to be honest I doubt I'll be getting more than 12MB/s (100Mbit) over the "300Mbit" wifi. I'd be very happy with 12MB/s. It's highly unlikely it will ever be any faster than that copying from one wifi device to another as you'd straight away have to divide the 300Mb by 2, then there's quite a bit of overhead and then of course other issues like not being right next to the AP etc.

The edgerouter lite is certainly another option for QoS/PPPoE. To be honest I'm undecided between that and mikrotik but either way it wouldn't change the architecture.
 
AP's arrived this morning. Will play with them tonight :)



It's actually 300Mbps wifi
:p Yeah I don't quite understand it either. Ideally I would get the "pro" or even the AC unit but there's *quite* a price jump there and to be honest I doubt I'll be getting more than 12MB/s (100Mbit) over the "300Mbit" wifi. I'd be very happy with 12MB/s. It's highly unlikely it will ever be any faster than that copying from one wifi device to another as you'd straight away have to divide the 300Mb by 2, then there's quite a bit of overhead and then of course other issues like not being right next to the AP etc.

The edgerouter lite is certainly another option for QoS/PPPoE. To be honest I'm undecided between that and mikrotik but either way it wouldn't change the architecture.

I meant it's 150Mbps max one way, (I know it's 300Mbps up/down), therefore it will be faster to copy between WiFi devices, as your limiting speed is 150Mbps of the WiFi and not 100Mbps of the Ethernet.
 
Took a bit longer as I had a bit of a shortage of network cables :)
Plugged in both APs, downloaded software, had to download java too, had to take something off port 8080, installed software and then basically just set an SSID and added both AP's, got the google map etc, "located" one AP so I could give them aliases and everything is up and running. Connected about 11 devices and had to give some aliases but at least now I can see what's going on much better than my router.

Copied a movie from server to laptop, something that always caused my tp-link APs to just die. It averaged around 7MB/s, not amazing but faster than before but more importantly stable enough to actually copy a whole file.

Connecting to the wifi network is also much faster now.

Roku shows 2 networks for some reason, but it connects fine.
Samsung tv wouldn't connect but then when I went to "network status" it's connected and running fine... Just samsung software for you :p
 
Took a bit longer as I had a bit of a shortage of network cables :)
Plugged in both APs, downloaded software, had to download java too, had to take something off port 8080, installed software and then basically just set an SSID and added both AP's, got the google map etc, "located" one AP so I could give them aliases and everything is up and running. Connected about 11 devices and had to give some aliases but at least now I can see what's going on much better than my router.

Copied a movie from server to laptop, something that always caused my tp-link APs to just die. It averaged around 7MB/s, not amazing but faster than before but more importantly stable enough to actually copy a whole file.

Connecting to the wifi network is also much faster now.

Roku shows 2 networks for some reason, but it connects fine.
Samsung tv wouldn't connect but then when I went to "network status" it's connected and running fine... Just samsung software for you :p

Haha glad to hear its working! Ja that setup does require extra LAN cables for the POE AP.
 
Guess I saw this thread a bit too late.

I deployed these at a friend's 300m2 house a while ago: TP-Link TL-H18R&H18E
Its works as ethernet over powerlines with wireless.
200Mbps over powerlines and 150Mbps Wireless N

The TP-Link TL-H18R is the router which plugs into the ADSL modem, it has two ports, one for WAN and one for LAN.
And it can connect up to 7 extensions TP-Link H18E, which each also broadcast the same SSID, and comes with one LAN port.

The cost was R200 for the router and R160 for the extension, Wifi coverage was good, can just unplug and replug where needed, and wifi devices can migrate easily inbetween.

There should be similar devices from other brands with better wireless I believe.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X