Higher load-shedding stages expected

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bianke Neethling
  • Start date Start date
I just googled this expert
Sustainable Development in the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences
What parts of those indicate he's an expert in power systems?
 
So many of these experts have failed so spectacularly in their predictions, I have to question whether we should pay attention to them.

Remember max stage 10, regular bouts of stages 6-8 in winter. Touch wood, we have not come close to that.
 
So many of these experts have failed so spectacularly in their predictions, I have to question whether we should pay attention to them.

Remember max stage 10, regular bouts of stages 6-8 in winter. Touch wood, we have not come close to that.
I'm not sure why they even call him an energy expert, I mean none of his credentials even point to him having done anything in it. All he's parroting is other experts who have said we're lucky cause of wind and things not breaking.
It's like noooo you mean we're having more electricity cause less things aren't broken. Say it ain't so
 
SA could have been 60% solar like Aus. Then solar would sure make a difference to LS. ANd the only reason why SA is so crap with solar uptake, is mad state socialism.
 
SA could have been 60% solar like Aus. Then solar would sure make a difference to LS. ANd the only reason why SA is so crap with solar uptake, is mad state socialism.
Firstly not the whole of Aus is solar, secondly the part that is, has interconnectivity to the other parts of Aus that aren't solar, so if they have a shortfall they pull power from it, they also use gas
1688456680538.png
Secondly, solar wouldn't actually do anything for LS unless we somehow had massive amounts of backup for it. As the peaks occur when the sun isn't even up.
 
Firstly not the whole of Aus is solar, secondly the part that is, has interconnectivity to the other parts of Aus that aren't solar, so if they have a shortfall they pull power from it, they also use gas
View attachment 1550603
Secondly, solar wouldn't actually do anything for LS unless we somehow had massive amounts of backup for it. As the peaks occur when the sun isn't even up.
Like I said, it should all have been done already, only reason why not is mad state socialism. You also need to be more specific about your statements, you can not refer to "state solar" as "private solar", because private solar sure has fixed LS 99%.
 
Additional
Honours Degree in Political Studies
So he's got about as much knowledge in electricity as a bag of dirt
Wouldn't trust this idiot to plug in a USB C port the right way up.

If you want the sniff test for any "energy expert" it is their stance on nuclear energy:
Screenshot 2023-07-04 at 09.51.05.png
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716

You see, providing cheap and clean energy via nuclear energy to everyone would hamper the "just energy transiton". These monsters want people to be poor.
 
Wouldn't trust this idiot to plug in a USB C port the right way up.

If you want the sniff test for any "energy expert" it is their stance on nuclear energy:
View attachment 1550605
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716

You see, providing cheap and clean energy via nuclear energy to everyone would hamper the "just energy transiton". These monsters want people to be poor.
Well I mean he has no technical background at all, his knowledge of electricity seems to come from watching a few youtubes on why wind and solar are good, nuclear bad.
 
Like I said, it should all have been done already, only reason why not is mad state socialism. You also need to be more specific about your statements, you can not refer to "state solar" as "private solar", because private solar sure has fixed LS 99%.

No it hasn't... it alleviates it for the house itself for the possible duration of LS if the house has enough battery backup to be totally self-sufficient for that duration.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X