Apologies, you are correct. But then merely change the context of my question. Why bother load shedding in residential areas if the power which these households use is of so little consequence?
I think we are the victims.(soft targets)
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Apologies, you are correct. But then merely change the context of my question. Why bother load shedding in residential areas if the power which these households use is of so little consequence?
Apologies, you are correct. But then merely change the context of my question. Why bother load shedding in residential areas if the power which these households use is of so little consequence?
I think we are the victims.(soft targets)
Economic output produced per unit of electricity
As mentioned above, measuring electricity consumption per person does not really provide any direct insight into how efficiently electricity is being used. Consequently, it is necessary to calculate the value of economic output (GDP) produced for every unit of electricity consumed.
How about showing us then? How did he arrive at this figure he so much wanted to have?However, even adjusting for these high usage activities, it would still appear that South Africa is a very inefficient user of electricity and that saving 10% to 15% of current electricity consumed seems very possible on a sustained basis without impacting materially on the growth of the economy.
Using a weight of evidence approach, all indicators reviewed in the above discussion (the low cost of electricity coupled with the high usage per person, together with the extremely low GDP per unit of electricity consumed) would suggest that South Africa should be in a position to save at least 10% to 15% of electricity consumed in South Africa without having a material impact on economic performance. The question is how best to do this and how to make sure that this is done on a sustained basis without any significant disruption to the economy.
That is 29KW per day.An average household uses about 10,655 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity each year.
Typical mid-income households spend R 150 to R 200 per month on electricity -- 500 to 800 kilowatt-hours (kWh). Most households could save 20 - 30 % of this easily.
I have dug around a bit more:
http://www.orielwind.com/faq.html says this of Ireland:
That is 29KW per day.
http://www.botany.uwc.ac.za/Inforeep/energy2.htm says this of SA :
A quick calc says R200 is 450KWh a month, or 15 a day.
Hmmm, SA uses LESS power per household than Ireland then?
So *we* are not wasteful? It is government policy that is.
It is the fact we export power at below cost.
It is that we import power from one place, only to export power back to that place - and lose on the transport.
It is that we spend more effort on getting someone to build another smelter, rather than encourage a service based economy.
I stand my ground - that report is nothing more than an attempt to serve some form of political agenda. It is far from the real story.
Now you compare two radically different figures and I am meant to bow at your feet and accept what you say, but figures submitted by a respected economist at South Africa's top domestic asset management company (Raging Bull awards) are pure garbage?
Without even bothering to look into your figures in much detail I am concerned that your figures for South Africa's "typical mid income" usage comes from a webpage for which I am battling to find many references. They also use those very figures you quote to state that households should be saving 20-30%.... more than the article I quoted! So thanks!
Your quoted Irish figures seem to take into account a different demographic as they quote an "average household"... quite a vague term.
goes on to spew a heap of comparisons, and never once mentions how it is to be achieved.SA should be in a position to save at least 10% to 15% of electricity consumed without having a material impact on economic performance.
And your illustrious economist fails to show how we can achieve these savings with no economic impact.
He begins with:
goes on to spew a heap of comparisons, and never once mentions how it is to be achieved.
A complete waste of time.
As to your "quite a vague term" - how on earth is it any vaguer than quoting China as a whole?
You seem hell bent on proving SA to be worthwhile - despite any and all evidence to the contrary.
If you have enough energy to respond then please at least have enough to read everything.... it makes responses pretty pointless if you haven't. But I will not be so rude as to ignore what you posted....
Without even bothering to look into your figures in much detail I am concerned that your figures for South Africa's "typical mid income" usage comes from a webpage for which I am battling to find many references.
PS Well done on another post to add to your count for a mere rolling eyes smiley!