South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Exactly.Exactly what I've been saying since this 1%-hating started. It's not the top 1% that's to blame for inequality, it's the bottom 40%. My guess was wrong - the bottom 60% is to blame - they're nothing but worthless leaches, breading like rats and dragging down the numbers. And when the numbers are translated to the real world, they impede society's progress. It's time to cut off their supply and let natural selection get us out of the mess that charity has got us into.
Exactly what I've been saying since this 1%-hating started. It's not the top 1% that's to blame for inequality, it's the bottom 40%. My guess was wrong - the bottom 60% is to blame - they're nothing but worthless leaches, breading like rats and dragging down the numbers. And when the numbers are translated to the real world, they impede society's progress. It's time to cut off their supply and let natural selection get us out of the mess that charity has got us into.
ThisI couldn't agree more! I still believe that social grants should only be given to those willing to accept the removal of their reproductive ability.