I am so lucky

eXisor said:
The point is there is a contract between model and photographer, and this posting on forum to show he's a the man is not part of it. As a professional he should not be doing it.
.
Click to expand...
Well technically I'm not a professional...... just yet but I hear what you saying or is it I understand what you wrote
 
I contest the derailing accusation. My posts are all on topic.
.
 
eXisor said:
The point is there is a contract between model and photographer, and this posting on forum to show he's a the man is not part of it. As a professional he should not be doing it.
.
Click to expand...

There is a contract? And does it exclude posting on here? Mind posting a copy of it, I'd love to have a look.

I think you're just trying to c***-block the rest of us why want to ... appreciate the OPs work. :mad:
 
MartyMarts said:
Still no pics? wtf... Thread should be deleted already.
Click to expand...

No. OP will surely deliver.

While we wait, let's debate this bunny:
bunny-2-jpg.jpg
 
eXisor said:
No less a creep. If she was my daughter I'd want to find you.
.
Click to expand...

Are you implying you will be a bad parent and your kid a tad slow to let herself be "shot" in some compromising circumstantial?

eXisor said:
And in your opinion models who hire someone for a shoot expect the photographer to post about their shoot (and maybe even photos since he reckons he's still editing) on their favourite forum? Right.
.
Click to expand...

eXisor said:
The point is there is a contract between model and photographer, and this posting on forum to show he's a the man is not part of it. As a professional he should not be doing it.
.
Click to expand...

You do realise that a lot of the time the photos become the property of the photographer? Or do you not know how contract and the like work?

Stop being so self righteous, if the model allowed the photographer to take pics of her in any state of dress, that was her choice, or are you advocating that women are always the victim and thus the weaker sex?
 
Devill said:
Are you implying you will be a bad parent and your kid a tad slow to let herself be "shot" in some compromising circumstantial?





You do realise that a lot of the time the photos become the property of the photographer? Or do you not know how contract and the like work?

Stop being so self righteous, if the model allowed the photographer to take pics of her in any state of dress, that was her choice, or are you advocating that women are always the victim and thus the weaker sex?
Click to expand...

I've nothing to say about her letting him shoot her in a state of undress. Her call totally. My calling him a creep is totally and solely for his posting about what a man he is after the fact. If she expected him to do that, then fine, but he's not said so.

All the rest of your post has nothing to do with what I said.
.
 
Bar0n said:
Really? Are you suggesting, good sir, that this image called bunny-2-jpg.jpg is in fact a picture of a rabbit?
Click to expand...

I suggested nothing apart from the fact that it's not a bunny. It could potentially be a rabbit but a bunny it is not. I'm almost 100% sure of that.
 
eXisor said:
I've nothing to say about her letting him shoot her in a state of undress. Her call totally. My calling him a creep is totally and solely for his posting about what a man he is after the fact. If she expected him to do that, then fine, but he's not said so.

All the rest of your post has nothing to do with what I said.
.
Click to expand...

Your comprehension isn't very good is it? He didn't post about what a man he is, he posted about how lucky he is to have been in that position.
.
 
MartyMarts said:
I suggested nothing apart from the fact that it's not a bunny. It could potentially be a rabbit but a bunny it is not. I'm almost 100% sure of that.
Click to expand...

This reeks of Illuminati and Freemasonry...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X