iBurst Gaming....

Since iGame has been launched it would probably be the best option, especially if iBurst work something out with bandwidth.
 
I play World of Warcraft to the EU servers and my latency is really not that bad at 350-500ms. I'm not too sure as the difference in resources needed by wow and warcraft3, but as long as you dont try FPS....you should be fine.
 
(personal experience) problem with using igame servers with iburst - majority of the guys have 4Mbps dsl or what not... so they have a ping of 20-40 whilest iburst users sit around 80-100ms...

it gives those guys a good couple seconds to see you, aim fro your head before you even noticed what happend you'll be lying on the floor :(

Strange thing is when playing on SGS or Igame server it doesn't matter if I'm Soft Capped or not I still get the same pings...

my 384Kbps dsl gets better ping with COD4. Than my 1Mbps Ibust.
 
fishfly said:
Strange thing is when playing on SGS or Igame server it doesn't matter if I'm Soft Capped or not I still get the same pings...

my 384Kbps dsl gets better ping with COD4. Than my 1Mbps Ibust.
Click to expand...

This is because speed has nothing to do with ping/latency.

It's the technology that determines the ping. 4mb or 384kb ADSL could have the same latency, and iBurst stays the same regardless of soft cap.
 
I play WoW very often using Iburst, and it works fine. Even after I'm capped.
Before I'm capped my latency runs between 340ms and 700ms after I'm capped it runs from 600ms too sometimes 900ms. So for me it works fine.
Odd occasion I have jammed GoW also, and it worked fine.
And I am using my Iburst connection across a WLAN.
Suppose if I run off my server it'll be faster.
My 2 cents.
 
FACT:

You get better latency (60-90) when capped than when ur not (200-250) on counter strike source steam IS server!

WTH!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X