Let's see ...
Paging through the history books ...
"Telkom will not abuse it's protected monopoly status. Government has majority shares which it intends to use to protect the South African consumer."
... Years later ...
"Telecoms prices are too high. We need to introduce competition but we are not admitting that 'managed liberalism' is a failure - only that, perhaps, previous implementations thereof was lacking. We'll introduce the SNO and prices will drop!"
... Even more years later ...
"Neotel can no longer have the backhaul network we promised them as prices are still too high and only goverment can ensure price reductions through Infraco. We'll also lay our own submarine cables sometime in the future (just don't ask when)"
"No, no, no. Government needs to retain the Telkom shares in order to safeguard the country in the event of a tsnunami. It doesn't matter that telecoms prices are still too high. Government can't just tell Telkom to reduce prices, the share profits / revenue would decrease

... a new discovery is made ...
"Don't let everyone dig up our roads, have everyone go through a single CIV to lay the fibre and lease it to operators. Makes logistical sense afterall. Let's hope this single provider won't charge too much."
With SA business heavily reliant on BEE status, this makes one wonder which millionaire african elitists has shares in yet another lucrative telecoms cash-making machine?
... Present ...
"ICASA has failed to reduce prices. Mr Mashile (immune to criticism) has forgotten his 'promise' of delivery by ICASA or he'd resign, now places all of South Africa's telecoms hopes in Infraco to be 'miracle' cure instead of getting ICASA in shape and on par with overseas regulators in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and strength."
... hmm, this isn't a history book - it's the Shame of SA Governance and the Pride of Corruption handbook /sarcasm.
Talk about putting all your eggs in one basket (yet again). Can nobody in government realise short-sightedness is not the right way to run a country? Price reductions, penetration rates, improved speed and quality service to promote the country and allow us to compete in the global economy should have multiple projects working towards the same goals (yet with a centralised oversight body to reduce inefficiencies and keep costs to a minimum). Yes, it requires effort and quailified personnel but it's not like the powers-that-be are not being paid to do the job. Oh wait, I forget about the gravy-train / free-ride / entitlement attitude ... Please someone take accountability and show me wrong before it's too late
