ICC Power Grab

MickeyD

RIP
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
139,095
Reaction score
432
Location
Nelson Mandela Bay
England, India and Australia's power grab at the ICC is the worst thing that has ever happened to our sport

By Scyld Berry
25 Jun 2014

On Thursday the Full Council of the International Cricket Council is poised to rubber-stamp the worst thing that has ever happened to cricket, and nobody thereafter can do anything about it.

In future, the rich cricket countries will get richer. It is the same everywhere else in the world, of course, but this spits in the face of cricket. If it does anything of value, the sport promotes fair play on a level playing field.

In addition, Test cricket will surely be reduced to an ever diminishing number of countries, and the sport’s growth worldwide reduced; and if corruption and match-fixing are bad now, we may not have seen anything yet.

The worst thing that has happened to cricket is the takeover of the ICC by the chairmen of Australia, England and India in constitutional changes which will be rubberstamped today in Melbourne by their craven minions.

Everyone knows this power-grab is utterly unethical, but everyone with a vote has been asked: do you want to say no, or do you want a lucrative tour by India, with all the broadcasting rights you can sell? Or if you feel like a nice soft ICC loan, like the $4m just given to the West Indies board, you have only to ask!

Instead of behaving like a governing body, the new-look ICC will channel 62 per cent of the main money-pot into the pockets of Australia, England and above all India.

The chairmen of the Australian and England boards, Wally Edwards and Giles Clarke, say they had to go along with India to stop them breaking away – and it could well be argued that India, for generating most of cricket’s revenues, is entitled to something extra, like a six-week window free of international cricket so that all the best cricketers can participate in their Indian Premier League. But this does not explain why Australia and England are shoving their snouts in the trough.

And while the Big Three further enrich themselves, the other seven Test countries will be fobbed off with the honour of belonging to 'the Test Match club' and 5 per cent each. Enjoy the current Test series between West Indies and New Zealand, because they may not bother to subsidise the most uneconomic format for much longer – especially after the Big Three revealed what really interests them by killing off the World Test Championships of 2017 and 2021, which the old ICC had planned, and replacing it with a 50-over Champions Trophy.

Only a few people who are above the petty politics but know what is going on have spoken out: like several former ICC presidents, from various countries, and Lord Woolf, the former Chief Justice of England and Wales, who has roundly condemned this turning of the sport’s governing body into a private members’ club ruled exclusively by the Big Three.

One former ICC president, Ehsan Mani, has calculated that $300 million will be cut from the ICC’s Development Program in the next 10 years – money that will go into the pot for the Big Three to hog. The prospects of cricket expanding into China and the United States and becoming a global sport will be diminished, along with the budgets of Affiliate countries. The Big Three want to be big fishes in their own small pond.

You have to hand it to the three chairmen: the way they have forced through their takeover makes Machiavelli look naive. Essentially, they will rule every committee, and nothing will be on the agenda – let alone decided – without their approval.

And the new chairman of the ICC is Narayanaswami Srinivasan, who has been suspended as chairman of the Board of Control for Cricket in India by the country’s Supreme Court pending an investigation into corruption charges stemming from the IPL of 2013. One would have thought anyone with a shred of decency would have stood down from any involvement in the ICC until the allegations were dismissed.

Most disturbing, and disgusting, of all is that the Big Three will control all matters relating to anti-corruption, ethics and integrity issues: the very three people who have violated cricket’s core values.

I believe every cricket follower in Australia, England and India should feel ashamed at what their board chairmen are doing. The governments of those countries should be disturbed as well. It is foreseeable that people in the West Indies, Pakistan and around the world will resent our part in damaging their cricket.

This is the worst thing that has ever happened to our sport.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cr...hing-that-has-ever-happened-to-our-sport.html
 
This is the worst thing that has ever happened to our sport.

Abysmally spot on. That South Africa is going along with this, is inexcusable and unforgivable!
 
Abysmally spot on. That South Africa is going along with this, is inexcusable and unforgivable!

they've bullied everyone into going along with it.
 
CSA, wtf are you doing????

Another major achievement was the ICC agreeing Thursday to grant Pakistan the fourth rank after the ‘Big-3’ – India, England and Australia – in terms of the percentage of revenue to be received from the ICC in the next eight years from broadcasting and other rights on ICC fixtures.

The third big recognition is, the ICC confirming Pakistan to get the position of the global body’s president for one year with effect from June 2015.
 
(speed) reading some news and it appears that even Pakistan will be getting a better deal than SA. :wtf:

Sadly I reckon this is how they buy votes. Short term gain = long term fail.
 
Abysmally spot on. That South Africa is going along with this, is inexcusable and unforgivable!

(speed) reading some news and it appears that even Pakistan will be getting a better deal than SA. :wtf:

SA and Pakistan fought the hardest against this.

I for one can just not understand how a team that is consistently ranked int he top 3-4 spots across all the formats can not be brought into the fold......:mad:
 
Then too add salt....

Bleak Test outlook for Proteas

The disturbing marginalisation of South African cricket on the international pecking order, particularly in Test terms, is only going to become increasingly apparent over the next year and beyond.

Enjoy the strength-versus-strength -- yet tragically and revealingly only two-Test – mini-series in Sri Lanka later this month, folks: it could be the last truly meaningful challenge the No 2-ranked Proteas have in the five-day arena for some 15 months.

It has already been known for some time that the International Cricket Council is to rather sickeningly, depressingly have its strings pulled from now on by a commercially all-powerful trio of India, England and Australia, with the remainder of the traditional Test-playing nations simply scavenging for whatever crumbs may be on offer to them.

Those three will become a convenient little mafia, ensuring that they play each other as often as possible on a global roster already tilting increasingly obviously away from the time-honoured, long-form game to cram in as much one-day cricket in both formats as can be exploited.

Over the past few days, the icy blast of winter to South African enthusiasts only got more hostile when it became known that the country will have no initial say on the five-member ICC executive committee.

Wally Edwards (Australia) is the chair, and the other two permanent members are England (Giles Clarke) and India, represented by the controversial N Srinivasan who is avowedly no friend of the South African cause and was recently installed as new ICC chairman.

Two additional members of the panel will be elected every two years, and tellingly South Africa has no immediate presence: instead West Indies’ David Cameron and Pakistan’s Najam Sethi crack the nod.

Other committees announced similarly had no South African representation – we are the only Full Member nation in that impotent position.

And if Test cricket is your preferred cup of tea, don’t expect much in the way of blue-chip activity for the Proteas until as distant a date as October 2015 when they supposedly travel to India for a provisionally-intended three-Test series (cynics are bound to be concerned that it may even be condensed to two, given India’s preoccupation with the limited-overs game and antagonism toward SA).

Once back from Sri Lanka, where at least a 1-0 win is apparently required to take presently ring-rusty South Africa back to the top of the pile, the Proteas go into a period where ODI activity lopsidedly holds sway – officially, we will constantly be reminded that it is important for World Cup preparation – and any Test combat will be curtailed to questionable bursts against significantly weaker foes.

Beyond Sri Lanka, the Proteas will play a once-off Test in ninth-ranked Zimbabwe in August, and then the “headline” and only act of our domestic summer will be ... ta-daah! ... West Indies (eighth and unbudgingly so) in three Tests at Centurion, Port Elizabeth and Cape Town.

Once admittedly a formidable drawcard, the Caribbean side have been in the doldrums for not far from 25 years and they have just come off another lamentable outcome: a 2-1 home defeat to New Zealand.

You do wonder how enthusiastically and effectively CSA will be able to market the series, when even against agreeably stronger opponents it can be a challenge to get bums on seats at venues like St George’s Park and Kingsmead for Tests.

Before the latest setback, the West Indies Test scorecard reads: lost 2-0 to New Zealand (away), lost 2-0 to India (away); the losing streak is only broken by a home 2-0 disposal of similarly second-tier Zimbabwe in 2012/13.

Nor is a genuinely attractive Test series immediately in the pipeline for the Proteas after the Australia-New Zealand-staged World Cup in February and March 2014; a visit to 10th-placed minnows Bangladesh is next on the intended itinerary for Hashim Amla and company, with the again limited weight in ranking terms which that expected victory would bring.

In the meantime Australia, a whisker ahead of South Africa in top spot on the table (and I, for one, am not yet fully convinced of the mathematical or moral legitimacy of that situation), can look forward to four Tests against India in their own 2014/15 season.

England? Though wobbling at present in a rebuild phase, a plump five-Test home series against the Indians is imminent, and it will be only next season that another lucrative Ashes – hold on, it seems like we’ve only just done back-to-back ones? – is staged on their soil.

You just get the powerful feeling that it is going to be deemed inconvenient to have a country like South Africa at the top of the Test pile – long series will increasingly become the lone preserve of the “big three” between themselves because they make the most monetary sense – and devious steps will be taken in scheduling terms to prevent the pesky Proteas from spoiling that forced equilibrium.

That, I fear, is simply the new, uncaring and crooked world landscape we will live in.

That will be life at the wonky plastic table.

Push down those serviettes, please, I think they’re about to blow off ...

Bleak Test outlook for Proteas

Well now they can pick who ever they want in each team, not going to bother with cricket anymore. F you ICC and CSA
 
+1, cricket is almost dead to me. I don't bother following it.
 
To the moron who sold out South African cricket - CSA president Chris Nenzani.
Thank you!!

Chris-Nenzani-Press-130202G300.jpg


If I remember correctly in February the CSA were going to vote against the big three's proposal of restructuring the ICC.
The CSA demanded the immediate withdrawal of a “fundamentally flawed” draft proposal that would effectively place Australia, England and India in charge of the world game.

But when it came to voting time Chris decided to vote in favour of the restructuring.
Very strange.
 
The only hope for the proteas is cash in on their rank and tour lesser prominent nations like Zimbabwe and Sri Lanka. This will ensure more home games because this is what fans want, not the wishy washy Indians coming for a half-assed fartolympics.

The ICC will smother affection for the game with style over substance and in a few years we'll be in a dead zone again like we saw after the Ozzies' 2007 tour to SA and increasing dumbing down of fan base in England. Before we know it main sponsors will be Oreo, Simba chips, and [gasp] Coca Cola.
 
The ICC has announced it will carry out a complete constitutional review of the changes brought about by the "Big Three" takeover in 2014. Moves have already begun to dismantle the system of governance proposed by the BCCI, ECB and CA two years ago, with confirmation of the expected change to make the ICC chairman an independent position.

The outcomes from the ICC board meeting on Wednesday also included removing permanent positions for India, England and Australia on the Executive Committee and the Financial & Commercial Affairs Committee - the ICC's two most powerful forums.

In a statement, the ICC said the board had "agreed to carry out a complete review of the 2014 resolutions and constitutional changes with a view to establishing governance, finance, corporate and cricketing structures that are appropriate and effective for the strategic role and function of the ICC and all of its members".

Shashank Manohar, the BCCI president who is also currently serving as ICC chairman, signalled his intention to roll back the changes overseen by his predecessor N Srinivasan in an interview last year, when he referred to "the three major countries bullying the ICC". Manohar will now head the five-man steering group set up to conduct the review, with an aim of putting forward recommendations at the ICC's annual conference in June.

Alongside Manohar on the steering group will be ECB president Giles Clarke, in his role as chairman of the F&CA Committee. Clarke was one of the architects of the ICC revamp - which resulted in a greater share of revenue for the three main boards - and had been expected to run for the position of chairman. The rest of the group will comprise heads of the ICC's Governance Review Committee, Executive Committee and Associate/Affiliate Member group: Nazmul Hassan, David Peever and Imran Khawaja respectively.

ICC to examine cricket calendar
Alongside its governance review, the ICC will begin trying to unpick the game's tangled schedule in order to build a "clearer cricket calendar with greater context".

The board is due to examine the balance of international cricket versus domestic T20 leagues - the latest of which, the PSL, starts this week - and the positioning of the three formats: Test, ODI and T20.

Among the changes wrought by the ICC in 2014 was the abolition of the Future Tours Programme. Since then, tours have been arranged through bilateral agreements, without the involvement of the ICC.

Players and broadcasters are likely to be among those consulted over coming months, with presentations on "various cricketing models" due to be made to the board.

The introduction of an independent chairman was intended to "avoid any potential conflicts of interest and to follow best practice principles of good governance". The ICC's next chairman, to be elected later this year, will no longer be able to hold a position on their home board, as Srinivasan and subsequently Manohar did.

Candidates to succeed Manohar must have served as an ICC director. The chairman will be able to serve for a maximum of three two-year terms.

Manohar said the board had agreed on a need for greater transparency and would reinstate the practice of Full Member boards presenting their audited accounts to the ICC on an annual basis. Three of the board's four annual meetings will now take place outside of the UAE, where the ICC is headquartered, with the Annual Conference set to be held in Edinburgh from June 27 to July 2.

"We had very purposeful and positive meetings, and the decisions taken clearly reflect that we collectively want to improve the governance in a transparent manner, not only of the ICC but also the Member Boards," Manohar said. "This, in turn, will enhance the image and quality of the sport. No Member of the ICC is bigger than the other and I am determined to make a meaningful contribution in this regard with support of all the Members."

Other areas addressed during the board meeting in Dubai included an update on the cricket's potential viability as an Olympic sport, which concluded that further work was required; and the establishment of an Anti-Corruption Oversight Group, which includes former India batsman Rahul Dravid, to annually review strategies to fight corruption.

The ICC has also reinstated Sri Lanka Cricket's full membership. SLC had been stripped of its voting rights at the ICC table in April last year, when the ICC took a dim view of a politically appointed board in Sri Lanka. That board was dissolved and elections held early in January. The ICC also said "SLC is now entitled to full funding", after having kept payments due to SLC in escrow last year.

The USA Cricket Association remains suspended, although the ICC has approved development and high-performance projects for 2016, to be funded from a "special projects" budget.

A change has been made to the qualification process for the 2018 Under-19 World Cup, with the highest-placed Associate team from the ongoing tournament in Bangladesh being given an automatic spot, alongside the ten-Test playing nations. The remaining five sides will qualify through the regional qualifying tournaments.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/content/story/968983.html
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X