If You Were a Terrorist, How Would You Attack?

Syndyre

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
16,821
Reaction score
2
Location
Lonehill
Not a nice topic to touch on, mllions of innocent ppl are dying because of them. It's just not right, nor fair.
 
The fear of items like toothpaste, deodorant, or water, etc. was misplaced anyway.

Your chance of being a victim of a terrorist attack has remained low, but various parties have worked to stoke the fear for their own ends. My problem with letting the authorities know about other potential ways to carry out attacks is that it may just bring more insane crackdowns from these nutters.
 
I don't think you even need a real attack to seriously frighten the people who allow these things to scare them. Just concoct an unviable, but apparently dangerous scheme, then let out enough information for the authorities to thwart the plan. It won't matter that the method of attack is totally impractical or even impossible. You can even set it up to frame a few "terrorists".
 
Crazy. Obviously smokers were complaining about not being able to get their nicotine fix after long flights. Why not just offer bookmatches at the airport. Free advertising etc ..

The Americans started this mess by allowing terrorists aboard with boxcutters (Stanley/Craft Knives to you and I). Now they want to impose extra restrictions on the rest of the world in typical US fashion.
 
I can't believe that the terrorists that we all hear about are really out there, doing the things gov't tells us they are doing.

If so many people hate America, UK and the likes, why are not more people waling into cafes and blowing themselves up like in Isreal. That would be real terrorism, and there would be very little that could be done to stop it.

Hopefully no one reads this and decides to act on this.

The alternative interpretation is that the terror risk just isn’t that high and we are greatly overspending on fighting it, or at least appearing to fight it. For most government officials, there is much more pressure to look like you are trying to stop terrorism than there is to actually stop it. The head of the TSA can’t be blamed if a plane gets shot down by a shoulder-launched missile, but he is in serious trouble if a tube of explosive toothpaste takes down a plane. Consequently, we put much more effort into the toothpaste even though it is probably a much less important threat.
 
Just todays news, they speak freely on tv to advise that they will free or kill innocent hostages. Sick.
 
From the Freakonomics blog:



Interesting, and a lot of what they talk about has actually happened too. What's scary is how easy it is to commit these acts and how hard it is to prevent them.

Followup here as well.

Why so much interest in this topic and the other one "good war" you started, Syndyre?
 
Why so much interest in this topic and the other one "good war" you started, Syndyre?

You mean interest on my part? No particular reason, I just find it interesting generally and happened to find what I considered 2 good articles today, probably because I've spent most of the day on the net. :)

I don't have an agenda if that's what you're asking.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X