Illegal guns amnesty hits a snag

schumi

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
25,095
Reaction score
2,032
Location
Durban
Cape Town - The illegal guns amnesty that was due to start in April has hit a slight snag.

Gun owners would have been able to hand over illegal firearms to police from April when amnesty period was due to begin.

Police Minister Nathi Nhleko on Wednesday presented the scope of the amnesty to Parliament's police committee.

The amnesty was set to start from April 1, he told the committee, and would run for six months.

But committee chairperson Francois Beukman pointed out that, according to the Firearms Controls Act, there had to be a parliamentary resolution before the amnesty period got underway.

Firearms will be destroyed

Parliament is sitting for its last week, before taking a break until May. This means the gun amnesty will not be in effect until then.

Nhleko said the amnesty would allow people who possessed illegal firearms to surrender them to the nearest police station without fear of prosecution.

This included those who had failed to register their firearms, and those who had inherited them.

The firearms would then be processed and destroyed within six months.

If the firearm had been used in a crime, it would be processed and a detective would be brought it, the police department told the committee.

Surrendering the guns would include a filling in a form and receiving a letter of amnesty.

In her presentation to the committee, Gun Free South Africa's Adele Kirsten suggested a blanket amnesty.

Criminals would not want to surrender their guns if they still had to fill in forms.

She said it would be better if people did not have to leave any identifying information when handing over their guns.

"There should be no questions asked," she said.

She also suggested that police would have to increase efforts to get public trust before the amnesty got underway.

"Neutral venues, such as municipal recreation centres, religious venues or NGO buildings that are accessible and located within communities are favoured over police stations; this because police stations are often regarded with suspicion and fear by residents," she said.

Blanket amnesty

Her suggestion for a more blanket amnesty was echoed by African National Congress MP Jerome Maake, who questioned if criminals would walk into a police station to hand in their guns.

"I don't know if blanket is the right way, but if I were a criminal and a police station was a shortcut, I would still run the other way. They would rather throw it into the river," he said.

National Freedom Party MP Ahmed Shaik Emam also called for a blanket amnesty.

Stephen Palos, the CEO of the South African Hunters Confederation, said the amnesty was a bit premature right now.

There were court cases of firearm renewals that would render the amnesty or parts of it moot, he said

News24
http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/illegal-guns-amnesty-hits-a-snag-20170315
 
Be sure to disable the weapon properly before handing it in. You might find yourself on the wrong end of said gun in the future otherwise.
 
Tell me Adele, where did most of the guns handed in during the last amnesty end up?
 
"Destroy the firearms" LOL yeah right.
 
Because criminals want to follow procedures to make sure they are on the right side of the law... :confused:

You just can't fix stupid, hey...
What they should be doing is making it easier for law abiding citizens to own firearms legally. We had this conversation again this weekend, a friend and I (his father is a collector)- it's just sad, really.
 
why not do it the other way around, give them weapon registration with amnesty


criminals will not hand in their guns or register them anyway. wtf
 
I don't see a gangster handing his gun, which he paid for, to the police. Yes, you can get a gun for 400 to 500 bucks. The deal doesn't look all that sweet to them.
 
This whole idea is extremely silly. So basically, I can kill someone with a gun. Then go and hand in (anonymously) the evidence to be destroyed.

This idea stinks. Basically a plaster for the much bigger problem in this country. Same as pigs hiding in bushes and sending you a fine in the post saying it is to improve road safety.
 
This whole idea is extremely silly. So basically, I can kill someone with a gun. Then go and hand in (anonymously) the evidence to be destroyed.

This idea stinks. Basically a plaster for the much bigger problem in this country. Same as pigs hiding in bushes and sending you a fine in the post saying it is to improve road safety.

You could destroy it yourself, looks like they preform a check to see if it was used in a crime before destruction.
 
You could destroy it yourself, looks like they preform a check to see if it was used in a crime before destruction.

That is assuming the crime has been registered and they have info to tie it to the weapon.

I could shoot someone, dump the body in an out of the way place, then go to a random far away police station and hand over the gun, they would do the checks and the gun would come back as "clean".... evidence lost in the quagmire and eventually destroyed.
 
That is assuming the crime has been registered and they have info to tie it to the weapon.

I could shoot someone, dump the body in an out of the way place, then go to a random far away police station and hand over the gun, they would do the checks and the gun would come back as "clean".... evidence lost in the quagmire and eventually destroyed.

True, but if they destroyed the gun themselves anyways doesn't make a difference to that situation.
 
why not do it the other way around, give them weapon registration with amnesty


criminals will not hand in their guns or register them anyway. wtf

This is actually a much better idea.

Criminals will just use this to dispose of guns that were used in crimes. Need to rather make it easier for people to register guns.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X