Incompetence by the DA?

Through nepotism the City Council has lost thousands of skilled planners, engineers and the like.
No wonder so much work has to be outsourced nowadays and a lot probably ends up with these same people that were shown the door who now earn more from a consultative position. Oh the irony indeed.

Yes BTTB, blame the past...
 
Did you read the article fanboy? This is City of CT related...
Yes I did, what is your point, fanboy?
The DA has to pay private consultants to do these jobs as the current employees are not able to do the jobs as they were just put there for political reasons.
No good having 10 people to do 1 persons job and then not being able to do it properly anyway, all because of AA or nepotism
 
Yes I did, what is your point, fanboy?
The DA has to pay private consultants to do these jobs as the current employees are not able to do the jobs as they were just put there for political reasons.
No good having 10 people to do 1 persons job and then not being able to do it properly anyway, all because of AA or nepotism

The DA has been in power since 2006 and these bids took place under their noses. If you refer to my thread on this subject, I have no problem with the use consultants. Its the R241m in unauthorised expenditure I have a problem with. Corruption? NO!! The DA is not capable of such... :rolleyes:

http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthread.php?235733-DA-splashes-out-R500m-on-consultants

Mods how about a thread merge?
 
Last edited:
Yes I did, what is your point, fanboy?
The DA has to pay private consultants to do these jobs as the current employees are not able to do the jobs as they were just put there for political reasons.
No good having 10 people to do 1 persons job and then not being able to do it properly anyway, all because of AA or nepotism

So where do you get off blaming the ANC?
It's been almost five years since the ANC administration left the building in case you haven't noticed.
 
One contractor was paid about R20m to advise the municipality on the Integrated Rapid Transit (IRT) system and ended up costing it an extra R80m in unforeseen expenses after saying erroneously that the city wasn't liable for VAT

Pffft...the ANC spends more on champagne in a year. :p

Actually we are not amused but we are only demanding good governance across the political spectrum...afterall this is the taxpayer's money, right?

I hear you and I agree. The thing is that many ANC supporters (and also disgruntled ANC supporters) will use this one incident alone to jump on the DA, point their fingers and throw accusations around - as is evident in the comments section under the article (oh, and this thread too, of course! ;))
 
Last edited:
Yes BTTB, blame the past...

Hi Sox,

Not sure what you are getting at, but it is common knowledge that each time the ANC have control of the City Council things go pear shape.

Let me elaborate. When the ANC are in control nobody that works at Council knows where they stand as far as jobs are concerned (nepotism), projects that have taken years to get to a position where they can be implemented at huge costs, yes consultants, suddenly are cancelled or shelved so that money can be spent elsewhere, meetings are closed to the Public, nobody can make sense of the budget and the Auditors take years trying to decipher the financial mess the City was left in by the ANC, money created in one area is taken and spent in other areas, water went up five fold since 2000. I can go on...

Look the DA is just better at running the City and by the recent by-elections held it is evident that even black people are seeing this too. The City has a lot of resources and needs every penny it makes to address the backlog in housing and infrastructure as the National Government run by the ANC will not give the City money to this end for fear of the DA getting the credit.

So yes I do blame the past. One of the key people I blame is Kortbroek for ever giving control of the City to the ANC. It probably set us back a decade or more in service delivery.

I will make sure with my vote and many others too that the ANC never get hold of our beautiful Cape.
 
Last edited:
The DA fanboy spirit in this thread is strong. Even in the light of a couple hundred millions of suspect expenditure by the City, its OKAY...
 
Hi Sox,

Not sure what you are getting at, but it is common knowledge that each time the ANC have control of the City Council things go pear shape.

Let me elaborate. When the ANC are in control nobody that works at Council knows where they stand as far as jobs are concerned (nepotism), projects that have taken years to get to a position where they can be implemented at huge costs, yes consultants, suddenly are cancelled or shelved so that money can be spent elsewhere, meetings are closed to the Public, nobody can make sense of the budget and the Auditors take years trying to decipher the financial mess the City was left in by the ANC, money created in one area is taken and spent in other areas, water went up five fold since 2000. I can go on...

Look the DA is just better at running the City and by the recent by-elections held it is evident that even black people are seeing this too. The City has a lot of resources and needs every penny it makes to address the backlog in housing and infrastructure as the National Government run by the ANC will not give the City money to this end for fear of the DA getting the credit.

So yes I do blame the past. One of the key people I blame is Kortbroek for ever giving control of the City to the ANC. It probably set us back a decade or more in service delivery.

I will make sure with my vote and many others too that the ANC never get hold of our beautiful Cape.

All I could read in that long post of yours are excuses, excuses and more excuses...Basically you blamed it on everybody but the DA. You mustn't come here with that "tendency" :D
 
The DA fanboy spirit in this thread is strong. Even in the light of a couple hundred millions of suspect expenditure by the City, its OKAY...

Hi Sox,

Actually I am not all that impressed by the DA, I am not a party member and will never be. We have a very lazy Councillor in our area that does very little and if said person stands another term I will place my cross elsewhere. The thing is as a group they are better at running the City Council, those are the facts as I see them. Perhaps in your area, Midrand the ANC might be better, but that is not the case here.

Regards,
BTTB.
 
...The thing is that many ANC supporters (and also disgruntled ANC supporters) will use this one incident alone to jump on the DA, point their fingers and throw accusations around...

I'm a DA supporter and I seriously hope that heads roll for these corrupt tender processes. This sort of thing is unacceptable for any ruling party. These practices need to be condemned by DA voters or we are no better than the ANC supporters we always criticise for being mindless.
 
Last edited:
All I want the ANC to do is answer one questions for me.

Why in contravention of the Municipal Systems Act which enshrines Public Participation were ANC City Council Meetings held in camera and the agenda withheld from the Public?
 
I'm a DA supporter and I seriously hope that heads roll for these corrupt tender processes. This sort of thing is unacceptable for any ruling party. These practices need to be condemned by their supporters or we are no better than the ANC supporters we always criticise for being mindless in their support.

+1000

Viva objectivity and to hell with sheep mentality.
 
The DA themselves criticized this, if you read the article. Even they think this was suspect.

But, there are two important things.

First is that the payments were not made to friends and family, but actual companies doing actual work. Second, the work was done - service delivery in CT is proof of that. Third, the DA doesnt shy away from criticizing its own when they done wrong - thats why they improve.

If this was the ANC, there would be denial all round with a bit of "Find out who spilled the beans" served for good measure.
 

Quote: "Here is a company hired by the city that gave the wrong advice. It said the city wouldn't be liable for VAT ... PricewaterhouseCoopers was then hired to advise the city and these people were paid R1,9m without a tender."

So let me get this right. These people hire an adviser, who gave them wrong advice and nobody picked this up from the DA. Then when ***** hits the fan, they hire PWC (WITHOUT A TENDER), to give them advice on the previous advice that they received? Wow!!!! I don't know how anybody can even attempt to defend that.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X