R13...
Honorary Master
If you did drink you'd have no recourse as they seem to operate on zero toleranceAnd if it turns out (months later) you weren't intoxicated at all?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
If you did drink you'd have no recourse as they seem to operate on zero toleranceAnd if it turns out (months later) you weren't intoxicated at all?
I was with Santam, and they insisted that I fit a tracker in my new car - apparently if it's insured for over R300 000 they want a tracker. I asked my broker to get a price without a tracker and was told that it was mandatory. I then asked about other companies, and we moved all my business across to Mutual and Federal, who didn't insist on a tracker.
He (the driver) is listed as secondary driver and the insurer/representative claim he is the primary driver (policy holder).
If he is indeed primary, the claim can be rejected.
As explained here:
What happens if there's more than one question?I think this is the best solution. I will rather take question from my insurance broker and explain stuff to him.
Get yourself a company which looks for ways to pay your claim. Stay away from those who do not.
You will find horror stories from clients of every insurance company. I have seen the least from Outsurance - especially from a clients vs. complaints perspective.
This is interesting, I have always wondered why my insurance company never asks me to install a tracker in a new car while everybody else claims that they cannot get insurance without a tracker. They obviously go for the cheap and nasty 'insurance companies'
I have 2 vehicles. Neither have tracking devices.
I assume they'd have reasonable reasons for requiring it in specific vehicles.
I'm with Santam, have been for years, my last 3 cars were all over that value and without a tracker. Someone is lying to you.I was with Santam, and they insisted that I fit a tracker in my new car - apparently if it's insured for over R300 000 they want a tracker
Actually the more expensive the vehicle is the more likely that the manufacturer will void your warranty / motor plan if you mess with it's security system and / or electronics in any way / shape / form. Meaning you can't install a tracker in many cases.It makes sense that they want a tracker for an expensive vehicle
Actually the more expensive the vehicle is the more likely that the manufacturer will void your warranty / motor plan if you mess with it's security system and / or electronics in any way / shape / form. Meaning you can't install a tracker in many cases.
I'm with Santam, have been for years, my last 3 cars were all over that value and without a tracker. Someone is lying to you.
Actually the more expensive the vehicle is the more likely that the manufacturer will void your warranty / motor plan if you mess with it's security system and / or electronics in any way / shape / form. Meaning you can't install a tracker in many cases.
I'm with Santam, have been for years, my last 3 cars were all over that value and without a tracker. Someone is lying to you.
I'd be interested to know if the op has resolved his issue?There's no issue here. I suspect OP is indeed the primary driver and hence lied to get lower insurance costs.
If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear.
If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear.
I'd be interested to know if the op has resolved his issue?