South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I'm sure it can be challenged as a consumer. Not by Icasa but by NCC?From what I can see, other than a few missing legal requirements such as the registration number and physical address, yes. From what else I can see, someone forgot to disable 000's separator in the update file, so it pulled cost price as the first two digits and ignored the rest. They don't have to/probably won't honour that price.
Not at all. It's an obvious error.I'm sure it can be challenged as a consumer. Not by Icasa but by NCC?
Not at all. It's an obvious error.
You mean 0.1%I disagreem its definitely not obvious... I mean who would think that it was an obvious error at like 1% of the normal price? Clearly the NCC would know that anyone paying full retail for that is a fscking retard![]()
You mean 0.1%![]()