Is Monsanto evil?

You could prove it either way by posting a credible source for your original claim. My own ,admittedly cursory, research didn't find any credible sources that Monsanto policy is to take action against any farmers whose crops are more than 1% contaminated by their product.

Maybe you need to spend more time on the research. I never said that Monsanto's policy was to take action....but merely that they have the right to take action on the 1% without any consequence or recourse for their contamination
 
Maybe you need to spend more time on the research. I never said that Monsanto's policy was to take action....but merely that they have the right to take action on the 1% without any consequence or recourse for their contamination
That either.
 
Ahem.

4. If the contamination that has occurred is above 1%...then we are going sue your asses unless you pay us money. It doesn't matter whether the contamination occurred due to weather patterns, cross pollination or any other reason...you are at fault
 
The more I read about Monsanto, the more dirty it seems

More here : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4153635.stm

That's one where they actually got busted. How many are there where they haven't been caught? How can you trust a company that is unwilling to stand by their product?

However Nick, I do wonder at your lack of response at other schit that has gone down including the "Monsanto protection act"
 
What is evil? Is it the absence of good or is it the presence of bad? If it is both, then every one of us are intrinsically evil.
 
However Nick, I do wonder at your lack of response at other schit that has gone down including the "Monsanto protection act"
I haven't been expressing an opinion on whether or not Monsanto are angels or not. I've been questioning whether many of the accusations leveled against them aren't a load of big hairy ones. That is after all the topic of the thread.
 
I'll take a look at the Monsanto protection act (so called) later.
 
I haven't been expressing an opinion on whether or not Monsanto are angels or not. I've been questioning whether many of the accusations leveled against them aren't a load of big hairy ones. That is after all the topic of the thread.
Fair enough

That is inherently the difficulty in searching for information. There is so much noise out there that it is a shlep wading through all of it
 
That is inherently the difficulty in searching for information. There is so much noise out there that it is a shlep wading through all of it
Well, no offense but you're guilty of propagating much of the noise here and seem to have some very firm opinions despite as you say, the difficulty in searching for information.
 
Well, no offense but you're guilty of propagating much of the noise here and seem to have some very firm opinions despite as you say, the difficulty in searching for information.

I have strong opinions because it is going yo affect the future of our food supply, and any system that restricts our choice is bad.

I was referring to noise on the internet, where the actual article you are looking for is on page 56 of your search and you have to wade through 55 pages of environmentalist sites. On a forum, its not the same.
 
1200x-1.jpg

Monsanto Weedkiller Is  ‘ Probably Carcinogenic,’ WHO Says



Monsanto Co.’s best-selling weedkiller Roundup probably causes cancer, the World Health Organization said in a report that’s at odds with prior findings.

Roundup is the market name for the chemical glyphosate. A report published by the WHO in the journal Lancet Oncology said Friday there is “limited evidence” that the weedkiller can cause non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and lung cancer and “convincing evidence” it can cause cancer in lab animals. The report was posted on the website of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, or IARC, the Lyon, France-based arm of the WHO.

Monsanto, which invented glyphosate in 1974, made its herbicide the world’s most popular with the mid-1990s introduction of crops such as corn and soybeans that are genetically engineered to survive it. The WHO didn’t examine any new data and its findings are inconsistent with assessments from the U.S., European Union and elsewhere, Monsanto said.

“We don’t know how IARC could reach a conclusion that is such a dramatic departure from the conclusion reached by all regulatory agencies around the globe,” Philip Miller, Monsanto vice president for global regulatory affairs, said in a statement.

“The evidence in humans is from studies of exposures, mostly agricultural, in the USA, Canada, and Sweden published since 2001,” the WHO said in the report. “In addition, there is convincing evidence that glyphosate also can cause cancer in laboratory animals.”

The WHO said exposure by the general population is “generally low.”


German Study

There is no link between glyphosate and an increase in cancer when relevant studies are included in scientific reviews, Miller said. Last year, a German government evaluation conducted for the European Union found “the available data do not show carcinogenic or mutagenic properties of glyphosate nor that glyphosate is toxic to fertility, reproduction or embryonal/fetal development in laboratory animals.”

Monsanto’s $15.9 billion of annual sales are closely tied to glyphosate. Most of the company’s crops are designed to be used in tandem with it.

The stock rose 0.3 percent to $115.75 at the close in New York.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...nsanto-s-glyphosate-as-probably-carcinogenic-
 
It is interesting... Suddenly a hundred thousand articles all in favour of monsanto? It seems like they arepaying a lot of people money to write positice articles on them?

I can not fathom why it is legal for montsanto to change food just so they can sell their roundup poison. I agree with increased yields and drought resistance in gmo's but altering the food we eat with crap like weed genes so they can sell more of their cancer causing poison? Definition of evil i suppose.

I see multiple cases of farmers being sued world wide for having monsanto corn in their fields but never planted a single seed from them. It turns out that corn miles away polinated with their seed corn and now monsanto ownes the farmers seed.

They effectively patented a part of the natural cycle of corn pollination and actually have the legal rights to it now. That is scary and the funny part is it applies to not just the eu but sa too
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X