IS Semi-shaped high latency?

[mo0069]

hey has anybody noticed a higher than usual latency with IS semi shaped?

saix unshaped im getting just above 200ms but IS getting 300ms?

 

[fz1]

What host are you measuring latency to? Seems okay to me:

>ping www.google.com

Pinging www.l.google.com [216.239.59.104] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=195ms TTL=238
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=197ms TTL=238
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=197ms TTL=238
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=195ms TTL=238

Ping statistics for 216.239.59.104:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 195ms, Maximum = 197ms, Average = 196ms

>ping myadsl.co.za

Pinging myadsl.co.za [41.203.17.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 41.203.17.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=52
Reply from 41.203.17.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=52
Reply from 41.203.17.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=52
Reply from 41.203.17.1: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 41.203.17.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 15ms

I'm getting a 38ms ping on speedtest.net to Johannesburg and download/upload speed results that are in line with the norm, too...

 

[Threepwood]

During what times of day do you experience the higher latency with IS semi shaped?

I have not used it, but you should take note of the latencies during shaped and unshaped times, I would be interested to see the difference at least.

 

[mo0069]

ok this is i guess what would be "shaped" time

Pinging 216.239.59.104 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=283ms TTL=238
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=238
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=238
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=286ms TTL=238

Ping statistics for 216.239.59.104:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 267ms, Maximum = 286ms, Average = 277ms

Pinging www.london.co.uk [82.98.86.161] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.98.86.161: bytes=32 time=288ms TTL=39
Reply from 82.98.86.161: bytes=32 time=293ms TTL=39
Reply from 82.98.86.161: bytes=32 time=290ms TTL=39
Reply from 82.98.86.161: bytes=32 time=293ms TTL=39

Ping statistics for 82.98.86.161:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 288ms, Maximum = 293ms, Average = 291ms

Pinging google.com [64.233.167.99] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=461ms TTL=236
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=418ms TTL=236
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=386ms TTL=236
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=466ms TTL=236

Pinging www.myadsl.co.za [41.203.17.1] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 41.203.17.1: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=52
Reply from 41.203.17.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=52
Reply from 41.203.17.1: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=52
Reply from 41.203.17.1: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 41.203.17.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 35ms, Average = 32ms


will post "unshaped" tonight

 

[lotus123]

Looks good to me. I must say that I haven't seen any real difference between "peak" and "off-peak" on IS semi-shaped. It seems to go like the clappers all the time.

Results from http://www.speed.io
(Copied on 2008-09-22 11:49:59)
Download: 3436 Kbit/s
Upload : 392 kbit/s
Connects : 2617 conn/min
Ping: 21 ms

Pinging mybroadband.co.za [41.203.17.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 23ms

 

[milomak]

i haven't said this in a long while - IS semi-shaped ftw

 

[MoleWeb]

milomak- ftw?

 

[fz1]

milomak- ftw?

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/for_the_win