Yeah, always love people that comment on Atom's yet never used them.
The x5's are better than any of the Celerons barring the new apollo lake Celerons. They can push 1080p, power 1080p, heck can even view 4k videos. The emmc storage, depending which they use, can be faster than the first gen ssd's. And then there is battery life, that old i5 wont even make 3 hours with a new battery.. an atom on average will stream you 7-14 hours effortlessly depending on the battery fitted ( Lenovo miix310 can stream 18 hours and still not pop up a warning about low battery )
Consider the make and model and price

You will be lucky to get two and half hours battery life, these low end netbook, have craptastic emmc HDD period, yes respectable brand have good battery life and and likely a good emmc hhd, this netbook has neither of them, guaranteed !!Personally had a 2 acer netbooks both dual cores, it was let down by a poor performing battery and hdd, while you could swap out the ssd with a mechanical hdd, it meant importing the hdd, and it would eat at the battery performance even more.
Higher end netbooks costs an arm and leg and for the same price you can get, a decent notebook that would run circle around it, the higher end netbooks, might have things like touch screen and dock able keyboards and such, there is again trade functionality trade off's like usb ports HDMI and HDD space.
Besides some thing you completely ignored is the fact that the notebook suggested, was linked with like for like CPU performance and there isn't much between the two CPU's, in fact the celeron has more cache, the trade off is dual core versus quad core, but with the additional 512k cache makes up more then enough, and it costs only R500.00+- more and you get more hdd space, and likely better performing battery as well, intel graphics is also likely to perform better as it's higher clocked as well.Personally I would take the Acer over this heap of junk any day of the week.