Jooste sacked as Steinhoff CEO

:erm: :D

Be a lamb and find him something to work with, find him an AA exec amongst the top executives, so that he do his thing.

2015 story
The Steinhoff story – revisiting the humble roots of today’s R260bn giant
https://www.biznews.com/sa-investing...-r260bn-giant/

And in 2016, this deal happened.
https://www.iol.co.za/business-report/companies/lancaster-group-is-steinhoffs-bee-partner-2075213

So, in 1 year, Lancaster undid all the honest work that was done by boytjie's from stellies. It was all BEE's fault
 
Last edited:
2015 story
The Steinhoff story – revisiting the humble roots of today’s R260bn giant
https://www.biznews.com/sa-investing...-r260bn-giant/

And in 2016, this deal happened.
https://www.iol.co.za/business-report/companies/lancaster-group-is-steinhoffs-bee-partner-2075213

So, in 1 year, Lancaster undid all the honest work that was done by boytjie's from stellies. It was all BEE's fault

:D

I'm surprised AdrianaX hasn't come out to pronounce Markus Jooste's and board members' degrees and certifications free/fake.
 
You still don’t know if the company has any solvability whatsoever. The delay of the meeting with the banks doesn’t sound good in that regard.

Of course, but I'm afraid that the worst news have already been priced in. The restated financials will have to be very bad for people to continue dumping the share. The problem with Steinhoff is that the major units are very good companies, even though the holding company is rubbish at the moment.
 
Of course, but I'm afraid that the worst news have already been priced in. The restated financials will have to be very bad for people to continue dumping the share. The problem with Steinhoff is that the major units are very good companies, even though the holding company is rubbish at the moment.
But the problem with Steinhoff as a whole is cash flow, when the lenders come for their pound of flesh, the tax man comes for the tax evasion, reams of litigation, new debt costs a fortune.

Nevermind the real reasons behind much of the double dealing is that Steinhoff undoubtedly isn't as profitable or healthy as they've made it out to be.

The true depth of the corruption has not yet been revealed though, behind the scenes there'll probably be some furious manoeuvring to buy time, offload value before the donkey cart totally tips over...
 
The true depth of the corruption has not yet been revealed though, behind the scenes there'll probably be some furious manoeuvring to buy time, offload value before the donkey cart totally tips over...

That's my assumption of why Ben La Grange remains, he is CFO since 2013, he is probably the architect of these structures and tries to offload it as soon as possible.

There was a need for a fall guy who is Jooste.

Wiese's role is not clear cut at all.

The 6 CA in the board are either incompetent and didn't do their job, either in it.

They are all trying to cover themselves now and I wouldn't bet anything on Steinhoff's survival, if their survival implies killing the beast, they will do it.
 
Jooste is also a cheating scumbag, and not humble about his fortune at all.

https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/...e-polo-player-and-a-room-with-a-view-20171213
He was 27 when he became the financial director of GommaGomma, where his path crossed with Daun, and he invested in them.

“I just think you’ve got to have a lot of passion and drive. In a way, I was very lucky that I was very hungry. I came out of university with R100 000 of study debt – but with a chartered accountant qualification. After that, the money part of it got lost a long time ago for me. It’s the excitement, the people. To be in a business where ten of the other execs are your best friends that is unique,” Jooste said.

He was lucky someone mentored him and then gave him an opportunity to get into the position he is in.

Also looks like he was trying to hide assets from his wife.

What an ass. He deserves everything coming his way.
 
Agreed.

He sounds as ewwww as he looks.


The Seagull's Name Was Markus Jooste: Steinhoff And The 'Stellenbosch Mafia'

They called him "The Seagull". This nickname, which was only uttered behind closed doors and among friends, was a name that Markus Jooste had earned, not by virtue of his free-flying nature, but instead, as a result of his uncompromising hard-nosed executive style. Markus was the seagull because he would fly in, **** all over his executives and then fly out.

In one particularly nasty moment in which Markus displayed his propensity for flying in and ****ting on people, he made sure that he had a captive audience and used the moment for maximum humiliation.

It was after eight on a Friday evening when I, together with the rest of the executive team of one of the group's companies, received an SMS demanding our presence at the office the next morning at 8am sharp. Being called to an urgent meeting on a Saturday morning by the chief executive officer of the group was a clear indication that we were either going to receive an unprecedented bonus, or there was some serious ****ting in the offing.

It was with great trepidation that the management team arrived at the office that Saturday morning. Markus was already in a meeting with the managing director of the company, but it was clear that sparks were flying and Markus was in full battle cry.

The poor MD was at a loss for words as the tirade appeared to have no end. Eventually he literally dragged the MD and the rest of the management team on a tour of the factory, pointing out pallets that were incorrectly stacked or unevenly packed, dust on the floor and any small infraction that could serve as fuel for his indignation and disgust at the quality of the management he was about to fire.



http://www.huffingtonpost.co.za/chr...off-allowed-it-to-hide-the-losses_a_23303325/
 
:D

I'm surprised AdrianaX hasn't come out to pronounce Markus Jooste's and board members' degrees and certifications free/fake.

Why would he? Jooste is white, adrianax probably still thinks the sun is shining out of this guys ass.
 
South Africans are fond of debating whether public or private sector failings are the bigger problem. It does not take too long to realise that they are really talking about race.

This is evident as the country faces an unusual scandal – one involving a private company called Steinhoff. The multinational furniture company is in trouble after German investigators began looking into it, for allegedly doctoring financial information to mislead the markets.

https://www.fin24.com/Companies/Ret...-bare-in-steinhoff-corporate-scandal-20171214

I guess you can make anything about race these days. :rolleyes:
 
I fully agree with this asset manager.

A local asset manager has taken a vocal stance on the allegations of financial irregularities at Steinhoff. Benguela Global Fund Managers has written to chairman Christo Wiese, requesting that he and the entire supervisory board step down.

In the letter to Wiese Benguela’s chief investment officer, Zwelakhe Mnguni, says that the issues Steinhoff is facing should have been detected sooner and potentially even avoided if there had been effective oversight.

“At the core of this massive value destruction lies a broken corporate governance structure that has failed to hold the executive accountable and to protect shareholders,” Mnguni wrote. “Dr Wiese, we don’t think that with the information available in the public domain anyone could suggest that you were aware of everything that went on or that you were complicit in what appears to be criminal acts that Markus Jooste himself has described as ‘big mistakes’…. However, we hereby make the case that the board, as the custodians of the company’s assets, should have taken steps to thoroughly investigate the allegations of accounting and tax impropriety as soon as they came to light.”

Mnguni pointed out that only in August Wiese had argued in a radio interview that the allegations of accounting and tax issues published by Manager Magazin were “drivel” and “devoid of any truth”. Yet just a few weeks later the board acknowledged that there were indeed potential financial irregularities.

He also asked Wiese to clarify how the board could have decided that it would be appropriate for Steinhoff to release unaudited financial results. The intention to do this was communicated through SENS on December 4, but it was later decided to delay their release until further investigations had been completed.

“How did the board arrive at the conclusion that it is okay to release the financial statements for the full year without the auditor’s opinion and not foresee that this would spook shareholders already alarmed by allegations of accounting fraud and tax investigations?” Mnguni asked. “Did the board intentionally withhold market sensitive information about disagreements with the auditors until the last minute – why not announce the delays in October or November 2017?”

Mnguni also raised the fact that on December 6 the board advised shareholders that new information had come to light relating to accounting irregularities that require further investigation. This was the same announcement in which the market was told that Jooste had resigned.

“Is it possible that some of these irregularities were those whose existence was denied in the September 18 SENS announcement?” Mnguni said. “Shouldn’t the allegations of irregularities have led the board to promptly appoint an independent third party to investigate immediately on September 18 as opposed to an exceptionally late reaction after the fact? Does this on its own not indicate the lack of independence, to question and hold the executive to account, in the board?”

He points out that it appears that while the board was aware of investigations by German authorities into Steinhoff since 2015, it had until now elected to dismiss claims of accounting irregularities out of hand.

“Given such enormous value destruction as a direct result of the board’s dereliction of its oversight duty and responsibility, I hereby call upon you and the entire board of directors of Steinhoff International to step down immediately,” wrote Mnguni.

He added that Benguela had written to Wiese on a number of occasions before asking him to address governance issues on both the Steinhoff and Shoprite boards, but his responses were “underwhelming and in fact contemptuous”.

“Now that the self-same governance issues that we previously raised directly with you, Dr Wiese, have caused minorities so much hardship, it would certainly be appropriate for you to resign as chairman and a director of the board,” Mnguni argued. “This is the biggest public scandal in the history of South Africa. Please preserve your legacy as an astute businessman, do the honourable thing and step down.”

In a separate press release, Mnguni also contended that investment managers and regulators should work together to seek “justice for clients” who had been affected by the enormous loss of value in Steinhoff securities.

“Corporate governance is not negotiable irrespective of whether it’s in the public or private sector,” said Mnguni. “We’ve had too many corporate financial scandals since 1994 without any legal consequences to the perpetrators of these financial crimes. Most recently we noted that there have been no criminal prosecutions in respect of the collapse of African Bank which also cost investors substantial financial losses. If the investment management industry and regulators don’t step up the pressure in the Steinhoff case, the precedent set by the African Bank could become entrenched and thus do irreparable damage to South Africa’s ability to attract the desperately needed investment capital in future.”

He argued that this should not be allowed to happen.

“As Benguela we feel that the time has come for the investment management industry to abandon a diplomatic approach to corporate scandals but stand together to safeguard the hard-earned assets of our clients.”

https://www.moneyweb.co.za/in-depth/investigations/asset-manager-calls-on-steinhoff-board-to-resign/
 
Why would he? Jooste is white, adrianax probably still thinks the sun is shining out of this guys ass.

Case in point, regarding my post at #191.

I doubt anyone would condone Jooste's actions. But going on history, this post of yours isn't surprising, in light of your past racist posts.
 
Case in point, regarding my post at #191.

I doubt anyone would condone Jooste's actions. But going on history, this post of yours isn't surprising, in light of your past racist posts.

Odd that you don't find Adrianax's posts racist, but mine you do. And you will need to quote posts where I was racist. I would love to see this.
 
Odd that you don't find Adrianax's posts racist, but mine you do. And you will need to quote posts where I was racist. I would love to see this.
Dude, you need to be sophisticated. Use euphemisms like highly skilled peeps/traditional DA voters just as blacks are frequently referred as Anc voters/dem dumb voters/illiterates etc..

#justsaying ;-)
 
Case in point, regarding my post at #191.

I doubt anyone would condone Jooste's actions. But going on history, this post of yours isn't surprising, in light of your past racist posts.

You are off the mark here @Cr419 prob one of the more balanced poster. Where AdrianaX posts mostly garbage.
 
Dude, you need to be sophisticated. Use euphemisms like highly skilled peeps/traditional DA voters just as blacks are frequently referred as Anc voters/dem dumb voters/illiterates etc..

#justsaying ;-)

Calling a spade a shovel doesn't magically make it so. But maybe I should learn to use my words more wisely.
 
You are off the mark here @Cr419 prob one of the more balanced poster. Where AdrianaX posts mostly garbage.

Apparently it's not garbage if it confirms to your own views. And just watch now, he won't be able to find this so called racist posts.
 
Apparently it's not garbage if it confirms to your own views. And just watch now, he won't be able to find this so called racist posts.

Yeah unfortunately that is usually the case, I am actually curious to see this racist post myself.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X