Judgment Reserved In Muslim Marriages Case

This is why the state should not get involved with the particularities of marriage, as I have pointed out numerous times with regards to gay marriage.
All the state should do is provide the civil union framework that provides basic constitutional requirements. Outside of that Muslim woman are free to enslave themselves to their husbands as Mohammad would want it.
 
Hence me saying the bill of rights is BS.

Not really. Those of us who are sufficiently informed, assertive, and resourced to enforce our rights benefit greatly from it.
 
i wonder what are the T's & C's in a Muslim marriage.....

You say you divorce her three times. But you have take note of the location you're doing it because instead of divorcing Candy you might be summoning the Candyman.
 
i still dont understand:confused:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_in_Islam

In contrast to talaq al-sunnah, talaq al-bid'ah does not observe the waiting period and irrevocably terminates the marriage.[17] It may involve a "triple talaq", i.e., the declaration of talaq repeated three times, or a different formula such as "you are haram for me".[17][19] Some legal schools held that a triple talaq performed in a single meeting constituted a "major" divorce, while others classified it as a "minor" divorce.[5] Talaq al-bid'ah reflects pre-Islamic divorce customs rather than Quranic principles, and it is considered to be a particularly disapproved, though legally valid form of divorce in traditional Sunni jurisprudence.[17] According to Islamic tradition, Muhammad denounced the practice of triple talaq, and the second caliph Umar punished husbands who made use of it.[19]

Shiite jurisprudence does not recognize talaq al-bid'ah.
 
I assume you're of European descend, meaning Roman-Dutch marriage law already incorporates some of your customs?


Disclaimer:

Roman dutch law does not accommodate polygamy, secondly marriages fall under the Marriage Act of 1961 which is an act of parliament. Only some issues relating to marriage (not addressed in the Act) fall under roman dutch law.
 
Last edited:
Roman dutch law does not accommodate polygamy, secondly marriages fall under the Marriage Act of 1961 which is an act of parliament. Only some issues relating to marriage (not addressed in the Act) fall under roman dutch law.

That's my point. Much of what you ascribe to has already been covered by the act. Unless you want a second wife, in which case you can take the matter to court.
 
That's my point. Much of what you ascribe to has already been covered by the act. Unless you want a second wife, in which case you can take the matter to court.

Thus we are not all equal before the law.
 
Thus we are not all equal before the law.

If you live amongst the people in these areas and follow their customs and traditions, you can actually take a valid argument to court. You can then take the customary law route, provided your current wife allows it.

:D
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X