South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks has been released on bail with strict conditions.
The 39-year-old Australian appeared at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court for a fresh appeal, backed by a host of celebrity supporters and hundreds of protesters.
He had the support of film director Ken Loach, heiress Jemima Khan and journalist and campaigner John Pilger, who all turned up at court for the hearing.
They had previously contributed to a surety of ÂŁ180,000, while Vaughn Smith, founder of the journalist club Frontline, came forward this time to offer a surety and bail address.
Crowds of protesters, some dressed in Assange masks and carrying placards, also turned up outside the court demanding the 39-year-old's release.
The group, positioned behind metal fencing across the road from the court, were lead by gay rights activist Peter Tatchell and Lindsey German of the Stop the War campaign group.
One protester brandished a placard reading: "Sweden, puppets of the US", while another read: "Exposing war crimes is not a crime".
Assange has been in police custody since handing himself into police last week after an arrest warrant was issued in Sweden over allegations of sex offences.
In a statement given to his mother Christine from his cell at Wandsworth jail, Assange said: "My convictions are unfaltering. I remain true to the ideals I have expressed.
"This circumstance shall not shake them. If anything this process has increased my determination that they are true and correct.
"We now know that Visa, Mastercard, Paypal and others are instruments of US foreign policy. It's not something we knew before.
"I am calling for the world to protect my work and my people from these illegal and immoral attacks."
Web anarachists supporting Wikileaks and Assange have attempted to bring down websites such as PayPal, Visa and Amazon after they made the decision to stop processing donations to the site.
The Swedish authorities are pressing to have the Australian extradited to Stockholm to face charges.
Watch live on skynews.com/liveplus
The decision to remand him in custody was made in spite of the offer surety from backers including Jemima Khan and Ken Loach.
The accusations against the former hacker include rape and molestation in one case and molestation and unlawful coercion in a second.
Assange has denied the allegations, which he has claimed stem from a dispute over "consensual but unprotected sex".
District Judge Howard Riddle refused bail on the grounds that there was a risk that Assange would fail to surrender.
But Assange's lawyer Mark Stephens told Sky News he hopes that by providing judge with an address the police know and approve of, his client will be able to be released.
"Hopefully with the people who stood behind him last time coming along to court again we can persuade the judge on this occasion that he is perhaps the most identifiable person around at the moment and it would be difficult for him to go anywhere without being positively identified."
Today's court appearance comes as the latest WikiLeaks releases suggest British police helped "develop" evidence against Madeleine McCann's parents as they were being investigated by Portuguese authorities looking into their daughter's disappearance.
Kate and Gerry's spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, told Sky News: "This is an entirely historic note that is more than three years old.
"Subsequently, Kate and Gerry had their arguido status lifted, with the Portuguese authorities making it perfectly clear that there was absolutely no evidence to implicate them in Madeleine's disappearance whatsoever.
"To this day, they continue to work tirelessly on the search for their daughter, co-operating when appropriate with both the Portuguese and British authorities."
The cables have also revealed that the US was concerned that the UK was struggling to cope with homegrown extremism in the wake of the July 7 bomb attacks in London.
Senior politicians say WikiLeaks has jeopardised US national security and diplomatic efforts around the world.
The case has become an international cause celebre as governments weigh up the damage to their reputations with the right to freedom of speech.
Around 15 supporters of the Justice for Assange Campaign gathered outside the Swedish Embassy in central London on Monday, wearing masks bearing Assange's face and gagging themselves with US flags.
Slogans on their banners included "political prisoner", "gagging the truth" and "honey trapped in Sweden".
You mean they had him in jail all that time while it took only 2 days to release Dewani.
According to Nic Dawes of the M&G, Assange's conditions are that he surrender his passport, wear a tag and obey a curfew.
EDIT: Ah, and the BBC link says that as well.![]()
It's not funny but I had to laugh at those conditions![]()
3.36pm: Hang on. Swedish prosecutors plan to launch an appeal against the decision to grant Assange bail. They have two hours to do lodge an appeal. Assange will not be freed until that process is over.
Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange (A statement from Michael Moore)
Tuesday, December 14th, 2010
Friends,
Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.
Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.
S'right. They're pretty lenient for a terrorist...
I don't think its over just yet ,I read the swedes are possibly still going to appeal
"He was granted conditional bail for ÂŁ240,000, thanks in large part to an address being put forward where the Australian national could reside.
Vaughn Smith, a former Army captain who founded and runs the journalist Frontline Club, offered his 600-acre country estate as a bail address as well as a financial surety
Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.
Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.
We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again.
So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top:
- Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act."
- The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."
- Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders."
- Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch."
- Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist."
- Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization."
And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us!
WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this. But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases everything without any editorial control!"). WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as secrets.
I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo. That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.
But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?
But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented.)
Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?
Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.
Instead, secrets killed them.
For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the "official story." And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his release today.
Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed.
And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism. Period.
I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice to continue unchallenged.
Yes , correct ... The prosecutors have 2 hours to lodge an appeal with the court. He will be held till that process takes place. Then he might be released to the people that offered surety of 240,000 Pounds.
Assange appeared at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court for a fresh bail appeal against an extradition bid by Sweden over rape allegations, which he denied.
But after being granted bail Assange must now stay in custody for another two days during the Swedish appeal.
"They want to put Mr Assange through more hurdles and expense," Assange's lawyer, Mark Stephens told reporters outside court.
"This is really turning into a show trial and we will be in court again with the next 48 hours," Mr Stephens said.