FarligOpptreden
Executive Member
Where's the NSFW tag for the thread? Well, I guess a title like this is pretty self-explanatory... 
-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: How frequently are you watching FIFA World Cup 2026 matches?
Kate Middleton topless
- Thread starter za1
- Start date
satanboy
Psychonaut seven
capdevilla
Well-Known Member
perving at your neighbours with binoculars suggests to me they're indoors, and you can't get a clear view of them without going the extra mile. That's a peeping Tom. It's different if they're standing on their balcony, starkers. (Said balcony being visible to anyone passing by). Nothing to stop you from taking pictures of them if you want to. You can always justify it by saying you plan on laying a charge of public indecency and the pics are proof for the police
Last edited:
Kornhub
Blackburn Fan
I agree with you,wtf.
daveza
Honorary Master
These photos were taken with a telephoto lens - the extra mile.
LazyLion
King of de Jungle
a peeping tom trespasses on private property and peeps through bathroom windows.
A paparazzi stands on public property and takes pictures of celebrities who are visible to the public.
capdevilla
Well-Known Member
Not really the extra mile. Not in this context anyway. It's not the equipment used that's the issue, it's the location of the subject. Photographs of them in their bedroom, taken with telephoto lens is one thing. Of them on an open the balcony is quite another.
Anyway, I'm pretty sure they were aware of the existence of telephoto lens, and have been pictured with them in the past. All of that is what they needed to have factored into their decision to be on the balcony.
capdevilla
Well-Known Member
Well said.
Azbubu
Honorary Master
Boobs usually distract us from everything else. In this thread it appear to be the opposite. :what:
F
Fudzy
Guest
Woopy-****ing-doo. Part of me feels quite sorry for the fact she is now the target of bottom feeding sleaze rag buyers (I don't even blame the photographers).
The other part of me knows she must have realised what she was getting into so she is feeding this sensationalism.
The other part of me knows she must have realised what she was getting into so she is feeding this sensationalism.
LCBXX
Honorary Master
What is the big deal? It's just boobs, no? Okay, it it Kate Middleton's boobs; King Goodwill Zweletini has hundreds of virgins dancing topless for him on an annual basis.
mika1000
Expert Member
not nice to mess with her privacy like this. 
these photographers need to be shot!!! the bloody perverts!!!
these photographers need to be shot!!! the bloody perverts!!!
F
Fudzy
Guest
Necuno
Court Jester
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
- Messages
- 58,566
- Reaction score
- 3,437
Big deal for primates ?
daveza
Honorary Master
Cobblers.
So if I stand outside the fence and take photos through a bedroom window I'm paparazzi not a pervert ?
What if the balcony has a glass surround - does that suddenly mean it's 'inside the house ' ?
Kate and co could not be clearly seen from where the photographer was so the fact that a telephoto lens was needed makes in intrusion.
LazyLion
King of de Jungle
You are over simplifying.
There are a myriad of factors which would determine whether you would be arrested or just shooed away.
I gave you the two most basic ones.
But yes, if you leave the window or curtains open and stand nude in front of it, don't be surprised if people standing in the street start taking photos.
And if you tried to sue them, you would not have a leg to stand on. You are more likely to be arrested yourself.
But if there is one solitary person out in the street stalking you, or standing there for hours with a camera or binoculars, then you should probably call the police.
daveza
Honorary Master
This is intrusion, not just being caught starkers in view of passers-by.
copacetic
King of the Hippies
What crap pictures + Who cares?