dualmeister
Honorary Master
Have they tried switching it off and on again?
Last edited:
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
They broke the switch.They they tried switching it off and on again?
Or it could just be MyBb tripping over themselves once again trying to explain technical things, it has happened plenty of times before.This is what happens when they try and lie and don't know what they're talking about at the same time.
or it could be eskom, it has happened plenty times before.Or it could just be MyBb tripping over themselves once again trying to explain technical things, it has happened plenty of times before.
There is no direct quote there, did you notice? When has Eskom given such a technically incoherent statement before? Give me a couple examples.or it could be eskom, it has happened plenty times before.
Switch was stolen.They broke the switch.
The only one tripping is that Minister of Eishlektrishitty. He is on some serious stuff.Or it could just be MyBb tripping over themselves once again trying to explain technical things, it has happened plenty of times before.
I tend to agree. Most likely a misunderstanding by the journalist. It is bound to happen every now and then with technical articles.Or it could just be MyBb tripping over themselves once again trying to explain technical things, it has happened plenty of times before.
Wrong. Eskom isn't holding any balls successfully at the moment.![]()
Eskom right now
Bit like the phantom "bolt"? Highly technical that was, technical rubbish that is.I tend to agree. Most likely a misunderstanding by the journalist. It is bound to happen every now and then with technical articles.
You are going to die.
It's a well understood problem with journalism that they often struggle with accurately conveying the words of technical people.Bit like the phantom "bolt"? Highly technical that was, technical rubbish that is.
Yup,there was no boltIt's a well understood problem with journalism that they often struggle with accurately conveying the words of technical people.
Science journalism has countless examples of the problem.
My understanding is that the bolt thing wasn't the journalists' fault. They were simply repeating what officials told them. The officials were wrong there.
I agree there was no bolt. My point is the journalists were told there was one by the officials. It wasn't like they misinterpreted something technical being explained to them.Yup,there was no bolt
Just like the cake was a lieKoeberg: It wasn't the bolt | Business
It was not, after all, the much-maligned bolt in the generator of Koeberg's unit one that plunged the Western Cape into darkness.www.news24.com
So in other words there was no mistake they were just lied to.I agree there was no bolt. My point is the journalists were told there was one by the officials. It wasn't like they misinterpreted something technical being explained to them.
It's a different scenario.
Yea, the fault lay with the Eskom folks doing the telling in that instance, not the journalists for misinterpreting. They didn't misinterpret.So in other words there was no mistake they were just lied to.
Thats a good idea, keep chickens on hand for instant KFCMoenie worry nie, it will only be a small one...
View attachment 1614475
5 minutes? Not great, not terrible...Haaibo! I live 5 minutes drive away from that 10000 roentgen catastrophe!![]()
All I'm saying is that probably the same thing has happened again in this instance, the journalists have repeated verbatim what Eskom told them.Yea, the fault lay with the Eskom folks doing the telling in that instance, not the journalists for misinterpreting. They didn't misinterpret.