LAN help!

2scaly4j0o

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
737
Hi MBB forumites,

I’m looking to set up a LAN to a flat at the other side of the small holding.

It is about 110-130 meters away from the main house.

1. What would be the cheapest option? (Wireless or piping with the network cable)
2. Will there be drawbacks to any of the above mentioned?
3. Do I have any other options?

Thanks.
 

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
92,825
Wireless.

The distance is outside ethernet cable spec but should still work okish. Drawback to running ethernet cable outside is lightning strikes.
 

syntax

Executive Member
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
8,656
Wireless.

The distance is outside ethernet cable spec but should still work okish. Drawback to running ethernet cable outside is lightning strikes.

You think the wireless will actually go over the 100m distance?
I have doubts
 

Roger.Wilco

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
742
You think the wireless will actually go over the 100m distance?
I have doubts

I don't think he means just setting up a wifi router?

Cabling = cheaper and should still be ok for that distance.
Wifi = you're probably looking at around R2000+ for equipment on both sides.
 

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
92,825
You think the wireless will actually go over the 100m distance?
I have doubts

Yes. Directional antennas would be better.

You can get wireless to go close to 400km if you are really keen...

The OP never mentioned a budget though.
 

Tacet

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
2,733
Wireless.

The distance is outside ethernet cable spec but should still work okish. Drawback to running ethernet cable outside is lightning strikes.

Lightning shouldn't be a problem if the cable and ducting are buried.

There is a 100m limit on cable without a repeater.

True, but it is not a hard limit. If you cannot get full 100 Mbps to work properly, chances are good that 10 Mbps will still work. If you use high quality cable the net crosstalk and losses might be low enough that it will still work fine.

As for wireless, it can work very well, especially with directional antennas. It will be more expensive, though.
 

Roger.Wilco

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
742
There is a 100m limit on cable without a repeater.

Now this is the difference between someone knowing the facts, but not having experience. You can easily go more than 100m, like Tacet mentioned as well. It's just not recommended.

Nothing against you w1z4rd, just saying... ;)
 

syntax

Executive Member
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
8,656
Yes. Directional antennas would be better.

You can get wireless to go close to 400km if you are really keen...

The OP never mentioned a budget though.

He mentioned what is the cheapest option....
 

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
92,825
Now this is the difference between someone knowing the facts, but not having experience. You can easily go more than 100m, like Tacet mentioned as well. It's just not recommended.

If you can't get error free 100Mb/s bump it down to 10Mb/s, usually more stable at lower speeds.
 

2scaly4j0o

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
737
Thanks guys for the constructive input!

Think i will start digging that trench for the piping and cable :p

Will try to keep you informed as to whether the distance is an issue.
 

Grep

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
958
Having personally done this exact same thing, I would say its 120m before you really notice the cable is not performing. So yes, 130m is going to be really pushing your luck! Holding thumbs for you fella :eek:)
 

Roger.Wilco

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
742
Having personally done this exact same thing, I would say its 120m before you really notice the cable is not performing. So yes, 130m is going to be really pushing your luck! Holding thumbs for you fella :eek:)

I've gone just over 150m, running perfectly on 10mb.
 
Top