Large numbers; short scale and long scale

Humberto

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
2,433
Reaction score
16
I want to share some information about large numbers that I personally find very remarkable.

The first piece of information is from the Wikipedia article on the number "googol" (which equals 10^{100}, i.e. the digit 1 followed by one hundred 0's), see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol:

By Archimedes's calculation, the universe of Aristarchus (roughly 2 light years in diameter) fully packed with sand, would contain 10^{63} grains. If the much larger observable universe of today were filled with sand, it would still only equal 10^{95} grains. Another 100,000 observable universes filled with sand would be necessary to make a googol.

I find this remarkable because, according to my intuition, 10^{95} doesn't "feel" that much larger than 10^{63}, yet it is astronomically larger. And one would have to fill 100 000 of our observable universes with sand to reach one googol worth of sand grains.

Similarly:

Carl Sagan pointed out that the total number of elementary particles in the universe is around 10^{80} (the Eddington number) and that if the whole universe were packed with neutrons so that there would be no empty space anywhere, there would be around 10^{128}.

This again shows just how much larger 10^{128} is than 10^{80}.

To name large numbers, one can either use the short scale or the long scale, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales:

The short scale is now used in most English-speaking and Arabic-speaking countries, in Brazil, in the former Soviet Union and several other countries.

Countries where the long scale is currently used include most countries in continental Europe and most French-speaking, Spanish-speaking, except Spanish-speakers born into an English-speaking culture (e.g. Puerto Rico because of its influence from English-speaking United States) and Portuguese-speaking countries, except Brazil.

Afrikaans uses the long scale. Hence a billion ("biljoen") equals 10^{12} (not 10^9) in Afrikaans, and 10^9 is a "miljard" in Afrikaans (translated into English as "milliard" when using the long scale).
 
That's why milliard, billiard, trilliard, etc.
Same thing for German.
Millionen, Milliarden, Billionen, Billiarden, Trillionen, Trilliarden, etc.
 
Sorry to burst your bubble so to speak....there's the Googolplex which puts them all to shame.

A googolplex is the number 10^googol, or equivalently, 10^(10100).
Written out in ordinary decimal notation, it is 1 followed by 10^100 zeroes, that is, a 1 followed by a googol zeroes.
 
TREE3 is also a pretty big number :p:

I'd say.It dwarfs even a Googolplex ...and Graham's number.

But..AMAZINGLY... it is FINITE(believe it or not!!!!),and does have an upper bound although currently unknown.

Larger than a Googolplex...

10^googol

Where a googol is 10^100
- i.e. 1 followed by 100 zeros
so a googolplex is 1 followed by 10100
zeroes
It is realtively trivial to create a number bigger than a googolplex :
  • googolplex + 1
  • 10 * googolplex
Are both bigger than a googolplex and in fact there are an infinite number of numbers bigger than a googolplex.
Don’t get me wrong - a googolplex is a massive number - and it would be impossible to write it out in the space available in the Universe, or within time the universe is expected to exist, but for a truely massive number - look at Graham's number - Wikipedia ; a number so big it cannot be written using the 10^x notation I used above. Mathematicians had to invent an entirely new ‘up-arrow’ notation to be able to write out Graham’s number and similar.
 
Last edited:
It's amazing that TREE(3) is so large, considering that TREE(1) = 1 and TREE(2) = 3.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X