+1
I've also found when driving into the sun its easier to see oncoming cars.
Yeah, when the 5pm sun blinds oncoming drivers I always have my lights on so they can see me better.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
+1
I've also found when driving into the sun its easier to see oncoming cars.
i have no issues with ppl that drive with their lights, i also do it on long trips to nelspruit or the coast...but for pete's sake, if you drive with them on, or actually ever switch 'em on, please ensure that they are adjusted accordingly. i've see on numerous occasions each night where car lights show in different directions, much like boobs on a bad boobjob
But....if I indicate I lose the tactical advantage of surprise.i have more a problem with the inability to just indicate and look where they want to change lanes to before they do.
The dusk thing was meant purely in the car colour context. Whereas the headlights argument I think is meant to apply the entire day.I understand your point, but I still do not understand how this could achieve any discernible difference - at dusk one should be driving with your lights on already.
VW's are notorious for having dims set higher to almost brights level.
...I haven't noticed any increase in visibility - I had no issue seeing a car in broad daylight before - I'm not sure why we now require headlights. Anyone requiring headlights to see other vehicles during the day certainly shouldn't be on the road in the first place.
Previously I was able to spot bikes very easily in my rearview mirror because they were the only vehicles to drive with their headlights on during the day.
Of course all of you who are "pro-lights-on-when-its-not-dark" do realise that now your alternator now has to work harder to replenish the power drained by having the lights on?
And so you will not only contribute to global warming (as lights generate heat) but you will also use more fuel, thus increasing carbon emissions. ...:twisted:
So it does work then? The only difference is it's now harder to distinguish the bikes from the cars.
I made it quite clear that is was my personal, subjective opinion - from the outset. The morons with their brights on are a danger and WILL cause an accident - of that I am sure. The sheeple with their ordinary beams on during the day in 60km/hr Marlboro Dr traffic on the other hand are just mildly annoying.
Bear with me here - I'm not having a dig for the sake of it. I really am trying to ascertain whether there is a benefit, which I have conceded there to be in open-road traffic. I'm yet to be convinced about general urban-shopping trips benefiting from Frikkie having his beams switched on...
They were distinguishable, is what I mean.Not any more.
Maybe it's just me, but I've always been fairly adept at spotting 1.5 ton 5 metre long machines headed in my direction at 80km/hr during the day. Lights or not. This might be beneficial for the twits incapable of checking blind-spots though...
But this might just be me, or it might be that I won't be able to tell the loved one of somebody that I just crashed into that I couldn't be bothered to switch on my lights, or that I felt that my phone call was more important than the live just lost.
Oi, let's ease up on the inferences here please.I also drive with my seatbelt on and have a hands-free kit. But that's hardly the point of this thread, now is it?
What I see these days are headlights, whereas I used to see an entire vehicle...
Bikes don't even have a function where you can switch the lights off
Of course all of you who are "pro-lights-on-when-its-not-dark" do realise that now your alternator now has to work harder to replenish the power drained by having the lights on?