Major Terror Attack Foiled In London

Skeptik said:
Their attitude is different. Women are subjugated. Christians are infidels. Jews are bad. There are 70 Virgins waiting for them in heaven if they become martyrs. etc.. etc ..
Click to expand...

What rubbish. I dont recall anyone asking for YOUR interpretation of an Islamist. This is the western views about Muslims. There is no such thing as an islamist, its just a discriminatory word which makes insulting muslims acceptable.
 
"What is an Islamist? How are they different from Muslims?"

Question asked, question answered. If you don't like it, give us your own opinion - don't rubbish mine, sharkbait.
 
Skeptik said:
"What is an Islamist? How are they different from Muslims?"

Question asked, question answered. If you don't like it, give us your own opinion - don't rubbish mine, sharkbait.
Click to expand...

"While ignoring the overwhelming majority of Islamists who have nothing to do with terror and making them virtually irrelevant and stigmatized in Western political discourse… To ignore the complexity of political Islam and tar all Islamists with the same brush of terrorism guarantees Bin Laden's success."
[source]

Calling Out Idiot America
Published on Saturday, March 24, 2007


Nasr went on, “The Saudis have considerable financial means, and have deep relations with the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafis”—Sunni extremists who view Shiites as apostates. “The last time Iran was a threat, the Saudis were able to mobilize the worst kinds of Islamic radicals. Once you get them out of the box, you can’t put them back.”
The Redirection
by Seymour M. Hersh
March 5, 2007
 
I find it strange how they try to tack "ist" on the end of everything as if this denotes a negative connotation.

I bet the bhuddists are incensed. :p
 
So what do you think the supporters and apologists will claim?

False flag or foreign policy.
 
Frankie said:
So what do you think the supporters and apologists will claim?

False flag or foreign policy.
Click to expand...
Um, false flag AND foreign policy? :D

'There is no war on terror'
Clare Dyer, legal editor
The Guardian
Wednesday January 24, 2007

He said: "London is not a battlefield. Those innocents who were murdered on July 7 2005 were not victims of war. And the men who killed them were not, as in their vanity they claimed on their ludicrous videos, 'soldiers'. They were deluded, narcissistic inadequates. They were criminals. They were fantasists. We need to be very clear about this. On the streets of London, there is no such thing as a 'war on terror', just as there can be no such thing as a 'war on drugs'.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X