South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Have you cleared this with jingaling yet?Just speculating, but perhaps behind this search is a real power struggle between China and the West. I suspect the Chinese are doing all they can to be the first to discover the wreckage. This would send an emphatic message to the world that the great Peoples Republic is technologically superior and can do what the best in the West cannot.
I wonder if the Western allies (UK, Oz, USA) are aware of this, and so are holding the Inmarsat data and analysis close to their chests so as not to give the PRC a leg-up.
Nah, she has her own sources.Have you cleared this with jingaling yet?
Nah, she has her own sources.![]()
Nah, she has her own sauces.![]()
Should I hold my breath :erm:Earlier this month a New Zealander said he is confident he has the team that can find the missing Malaysian jetliner.
Probably the sun or one of thoseRead somewhere they found evidence on his computer that he wanted to hijack the plane to a small island?
they are going to start in August again looking down below.
And on news24 , the wife of the pilot said it was her husband saying, goodnight.
El Reg said:Handshakes one and seven are of most interest, because both were initiated by MH370.
“A log-on request in the middle of a flight is not common and can occur for only a few reasons,” the report suggests. “These include a power interruption to the aircraft satellite data unit (SDU), a software failure, loss of critical systems providing input to the SDU or a loss of the link due to aircraft attitude.”
Both handshakes are suspected as resulting from an interruption of power supply to the SDU. The first, perhaps, because of some disruption to power flow. The seventh is suspected as having been made after the craft ran out of fuel and is therefore of great interest to searchers.
Australian officials have said MH370 was almost certainly on autopilot when it ran out of fuel and crashed, with the crew likely "unresponsive" due to a lack of oxygen
The autopilot must have done a quite gentle landing, with the plane not breaking up, as no debris relating to this plane has been found.
Would anyone familiar with autopilots like to comment ?
Most modern airliners are equipped to land automatically under autopilot control (called "autoland"), but most landings are carried out by hand by the pilots. The autopilot is used for landing if the weather conditions are so poor that the pilots cannot see the runway, because the autopilot can land the airplane even in zero visibility, whereas pilots are legally required to have the runway in sight before they can land by hand.
The advantage of autoland is that it allows a flight to land at its destination even when the airport is fogged in. This avoids an expensive diversion to another airport. Without autoland capability, pilots must be able to see the runway, so if the airport is fogged in, they are forced to fly to another airport that has clear weather. Having autoland saves a lot of money, even though autoland systems are very expensive.
In fact, most of a flight these days is flown by the autopilot under computer control; the pilots just watch and monitor, ready to take over if anything goes wrong with the computers. Pilots usually fly the take-off and landing, mainly because those are the fun parts, but the landing can be fully automated if necessary.
So your cousin is half right: Airliners can land on autopilot. But they don't do it routinely; it's more the exception to the rule.
Smaller aircraft usually cannot land with the autopilot, mainly because autolanding requires extremely expensive, multiply-redundant autopilot systems that are only affordable for large commercial airliners (and some business jets).