Mandate to bridge digital divide

rpm

Admin
Staff member
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
66,805
Reaction score
5,057
Location
Johannesburg
Letter in BusinessDay by Marcel Raath from Sentech:

"The article, Still beating around the telecoms bush (May 29) by Lesley Stones, refers.

I would like to draw your attention to certain issues where I may have been misunderstood.

Sentech welcomes the news by Communications Minister Ivy Matsepe-Casaburri in the National Assembly during her department's budget debate. Sentech as a strategic national asset with important infrastructure and expertise would form the core of the wireless broadband infrastructure network to be used in enhancing SA’s socioeconomic development. Sentech has a mandate from the communications department to deliver efficient and affordable telecommunications to bridge SA’s digital divide. This is in alignment with the corporate vision to become a leader in world-class broadband communications.

It is in this light that government decided to invest in wireless broadband networks as they are less costly to roll out than fixed lines, especially to remote and rural areas.

There are three aspects with regards to voice that we will clarify once more information has been obtained. They are:

1 Offering voice via the carrier-of carrier licence to local and international telecom operators.

2 Voice to be carried to the end user via the multimedia licence without current limitations to Sentech.

3. Voice/ Voice Operated Internet Protocol through our Value Added Network Services licence.

As part of our strategy, we recognise the significance of telecommunications in socioeconomic development and to this end have embarked on a number of projects across markets. We believe in a hands-on approach that involves far more than financial support. We commit to our projects by providing skills and resources to communities to ensure outcomes that are measurable as well as sustainable."
 
Sentech has a mandate from the communications department to deliver efficient and affordable telecommunications to bridge SA’s digital divide.
Sounds great, where do I signup?

Affordable by what comparison, Telkom or lets say for instance the OECD, pick one you think you will be closest to, honestly!

Excuse my enthusiasm waining in the face of another state funded telecommunications monopoly being put in place to compete with er, the state.

Sure give em a chance, but I am keeping my 'I told you so' nearby. Its use is no doubt imminent.
 
Great another parastatal with infrastructure paid by the tax payer. I can't wait for them to be privatised in 3 years or so. It'll be like living a nightmare twice over.
 
Can this be true?

One govt body competing with another to win business from wrung-out consumers? Yeah sure. It only serves to make us think we have a choice.

(I know Telkom is not a govt dept but it sure acts like one)
 
So Sentech now have to come in and do (provide rural telecommunications and connectivity to poor areas) what Telkom agreed they would do, but failed to do so miserably, in their licensing agreement! Why not just take Telkom's licence away or fine them for not meeting their licence stipulations?
 
Business Day's Leslie got it wrong!

On page 13 of the Business Day of 1 June, a sneeky small insert reads:

"GETTING IT RIGHT"

"In an article titled, Still beating around the telecoms bush (May 29), Business Day quoted Sentech marketing executive Marcel Raath as saying he hoped Sentech would rather be allowed to offer international voice and data services to large corporate clients, not the average consumer, and certainly not rural consumers.

Raath did not say this.
It was inferred by Business Day following a telephone interview with Raath."

Wonder if the rest including Andre Wills and Angus MacRobert was quoted correctly?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X