Men are Screwed (rule 43)

Emjay said:
Non-MRA links.

Thanks.
Click to expand...
Not good enough. There's no reason that an activist would necessarily be wrong about the cause they're advocating for. You're just dismissing sources you find inconvenient based on a pretext. Especially when the phenomenon is under-researched because of a political agenda in place by the establishment a la political correctness.
 
technofool said:
If I have to guess you are single and wondering "where did all the good men go?"
Here's a freebie, the good men are hiding from women like you.
Click to expand...

:ROFL:

So that is a no then? You are literally complaining in a thread about issues which do not even impact you.

I have some advise for you: speak to all the potential woman in your life in the same manner. And don't get married or have kids. That's the best life advise you will ever get.
 
Last edited:
If anyone's into that 'sort of thing', the latest Contrapoints video makes some good points about the men's movement.

 
cerebus said:
If anyone's into that 'sort of thing', the latest Contrapoints video makes some good points about the men's movement.

Click to expand...

Oh, god. My world has been turned upside down.

I actually laughed.
 
Emjay said:
:ROFL:

So that is a no then? You are literally complaining in a thread about issues which do not even impact you.

I have some advise for you: speak to all the potential woman in your life in the same manner. And don't get married or have kids. That's the best life advise you will ever get.
Click to expand...
So if something does not directly impact someone it's irrelevant? Since when is anecdotal evidence the only good standard?

EDIT: "if you have never been murdered how exactly can you be sure it's such a big problem? "
 
Emjay said:
Oh, god. My world has been turned upside down.

I actually laughed.
Click to expand...

I did say 'if' you're into that type of thing. If not I'm sure you'll prefer YouTubers who don't lecture and judge you, like Ben Shapiro. Anyway she goes into The Myth of Male Power and I found it quite insightful.
 
rambo919 said:
So if something does not directly impact someone it's irrelevant? Since when is anecdotal evidence the only good standard?

EDIT: "if you have never been murdered how exactly can you be sure it's such a big problem? "
Click to expand...
Exactly, only murderers and murder victims may comment on murder. It is assine to assume that because a person is not directly involved in an issue they cannot have a valid comment. Insane Identity Politics. This just gets crazier and crazier, hey @Emjay .
 
Last edited:
cerebus said:
If anyone's into that 'sort of thing', the latest Contrapoints video makes some good points about the men's movement.

Click to expand...
OH Shirt I think I just fell in love. Emjay you could only dream of being half the woman Miss Contra Points is. :laugh:
Thanks for sharing.
 
cerebus said:
I did say 'if' you're into that type of thing. If not I'm sure you'll prefer YouTubers who don't lecture and judge you, like Ben Shapiro. Anyway she goes into The Myth of Male Power and I found it quite insightful.
Click to expand...

I did watch it, and I must say I agreed with a lot of what she said. I may have been overly harsh on my initial judgement of her the last time you linked a video of hers.
 
Emjay said:
I did watch it, and I must say I agreed with a lot of what she said. I may have been overly harsh on my initial judgement of her the last time you linked a video of hers.
Click to expand...

Sorry I misunderstood you
 
cerebus said:
Sorry I misunderstood you
Click to expand...

Hence why I said my world is turning upside down. :p

rambo919 said:
So if something does not directly impact someone it's irrelevant? Since when is anecdotal evidence the only good standard?

EDIT: "if you have never been murdered how exactly can you be sure it's such a big problem? "
Click to expand...

Don't you think it's funny how this person is not even married but wants to think he has an idea of what makes a woman happy? Or what their motivations are?

rambo919 said:
Sounds like you are simply prejudiced against MRA's...... and hypocritically complain about then that are prejudiced against feminists.....
Click to expand...

MRA and Feminists are all starting to look the same to me. As much as you guys will not accept a feminist source, I am holding you to that standard.
 
Last edited:
Emjay said:
Don't you think it's funny how this person is not even married but wants to think he has an idea of what makes a woman happy? Or what their motivations are?
Click to expand...

No not at all, many truths are quite evident (sometimes even moreso) from the outside looking in. Those on the inside are frequently subjective because they are under the influence so to speak. You don't actually always NEED empathy to undertand the basic logic of something but it helps.

For example people outside a relationship can CLEARLY see why a specific couple keeps fighting all the time even though neither of them can seem to understand and only keep complaining about each other instead of actually fixing themselves.

Though I have to add you are being logically inconsistent here yet again. If single people cannot understand married people because they don't share the same lived experience..... how can you understand MRA's as well as you think you do?
 
Emjay said:
Don't you think it's funny how this person is not even married but wants to think he has an idea of what makes a woman happy? Or what their motivations are?
Click to expand...
Who said I'm not married? Who said I'm not a woman?
I think your lack of personal information on me is cramping your style of personal attack. Just focus on my ideas and the veracity of my arguments.
 
Emjay said:
Oh, god. My world has been turned upside down.

I actually laughed.
Click to expand...

FWIW, this video of hers had some conservatives concluding that Natalie is a crypto-reactionary when it comes to transgenderism.
 
Emjay said:
MRA and Feminists are all starting to look the same to me. As much as you guys will not accept a feminist source, I am holding you to that standard.
Click to expand...
Fair enough in some ways, though not in others. MRA's are only at the start of their fight for legal equality in practice where feminists have spun many legal systems in their favour.... MRA's are currently needed to bring back balance and sanity to the system. Radicals on all sides are always a problem.
 
Gingerbeardman said:

FWIW, this video of hers had some conservatives concluding that Natalie is a crypto-reactionary when it comes to transgenderism.
Click to expand...

You know how the Left keep using X (which is unrelated) to try discredit a position on Y? There are many who do this on MyBB. You are doing that now.

ContraPoints does resonate with me in the video cerebus linked. While men and women all face different issues, men are not screwed. Just as much as women (at least in the Western sense) are not oppressed. And trying to say men have it worse off than women (which how this thread really got started if you care to go back) is just as silly as the comparisons are not the same.
 
Emjay said:
You know how the Left keep using a X (which is unrelated) to try discredit a position on Y? There are many who do this on MyBB. You are doing that now.
Click to expand...
Lol, now you are guilty of misunderstanding me the way Cerebus misunderstood you.

ContraPoints does resonate with me in the video cerebus' linked. While men and women all face different issues, men are not screwed. Just as much as women (at least in the Western sense) are not oppressed. And trying to say men have it worse off than women (which how this thread really got started if you care to go back) is just as silly as the comparisons are not the same.
Click to expand...
And Contrapoints might also resonate with you with respect to the video I linked as well. But you won't know unless you watch, will you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X