Men are Screwed (rule 43)

[technofool]

Nobody wants to be an incel or a beta-male but not even those guys will allow themselves to be insulted and mocked so often.
Incel is actually the natural default. In most mammals it is only the 'top' 10% or Alpha males who fight for the 'privilege' to breed. The other Beta males just walk around in bachelor herds or support the Alpha. Marriage was invented to give more guys a chance to appreciate the fruits of feminists. I say good luck to them.

 

[Gingerbeardman]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

And according to the Pew Research Center, a “steady job” is the number one thing that women are looking for in a husband.

Look, I definitely understand that working hard and being able to make a living are signs of a responsible individual, but isn’t marriage supposed to be about much more than dollar signs?

Of course women can definitely accuse men of being shallow as well. It is often said that men are overly concerned with youth and looks, and one very revealing scientific study appears to support that hypothesis. The study found that on average 20-year-old women were most attracted to 23-year-old men and 50-year-old women were most attracted to 46-year-old men. But with men the results were dramatically different. On average, 20-year-old men were most attracted to 20-year-old women and 50-year-old men were most attracted to 22-year-old women.

Could it be possible that all of the romantic ideals that we fill our heads with as young people are not actually based in reality?

I don’t know about you, but I prefer to believe in love and romance. But just like the authors of the first study I discussed above, there are many out there that see the search for a marriage partner as a “market” where everyone has different “values” based on certain characteristics.

Do Unmarried Women Face Shortages of Partners in the U.S. Marriage Market? | Wiley News Room – Press Releases, News, Events & Media

One explanation for declines in marriage is a shortage of economically-attractive men for unmarried women to marry.

newsroom.wiley.com

One explanation for declines in marriage is a shortage of economically-attractive men for unmarried women to marry. Indeed, a new study published in the Journal of Marriage and Family reveals a significant scarcity of such potential male spouses.
The study’s authors developed estimates of the sociodemographic characteristics of unmarried women’s potential spouses who resemble the husbands of otherwise comparable married women. These estimates were compared with the actual distribution of unmarried men at the national, state, and local levels.
Women’s potential husbands had an average income that was about 58% higher than the actual unmarried men currently available to unmarried women. They also were 30% more likely to be employed and 19% more likely to have a college degree.
The researchers found that racial and ethnic minorities, especially black women, face serious shortages of potential marital partners, as do unmarried women with either low or high socioeconomic status.

Hate fact alert.

It's ironically funny how guys who aren't economically attractive get mocked as being incels, and those who draw attention to this curiously vicious feminine behaviour are misogynists.

 

[Swa]

The problem with MRA on the Internet though is that it is highly hypothetical worst case scenarios that they push all the time as if it is that bad for everyone and it is the norm that men(which are supposed to be stronger and better at most things. the "superior" gender) are being oppressed be these weak, fat and ugly faminazi's.

It is exactly the same argument used by weak neo-nazi losers that lack a strong identity and culture.

Sure there is a bit of a cultural war going at the moment in politics. But playing the victim and pretending to be a victimised minority is just sad.

How are the issues I pointed out just a hypothetical worst case scenario?

 

[Emjay]

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/07/womens-suffrage-nineteenth-amendment-pseudoscience/59371

Didn't someone in this thread bring up Sedgwick?

A mere five years after The New York Times published Sedgwick’s warning, Congress passed the Nineteenth Amendment, which legally granted American women the right to vote. Civilization didn’t come crashing down. But at the turn of the 20th century, many people listened to Sedgwick, a well-known professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

They believed him when he said—as other academics, doctors, and scientists did—that women shouldn’t vote because they were, quite literally, not made for it. According to the leading theory, mental exertion could jeopardize reproductive health. And if the science of the day asserted that women could become infertile if they did too much thinking, no man would want to send his daughter, sister, or wife to college or the office—and certainly not to the ballot box.

 

[jambai]

I don't really have to say anything. I will just leave your posts here.

I don’t have to say much and can see your arguments getting dismantled in this forum . I am not engaging and merely chirping . If I were to engage you and prove you wrong you still would not admit it so why waste my energy typing on here

 

[Swa]

Emjay is showing what's wrong in this world. Even those claiming not to be feminists are falling for the feminist mantra without even being able to see it.

 

[technofool]

Emjay is showing what's wrong in this world. Even those claiming not to be feminists are falling for the feminist mantra without even being able to see it.

I think it is even more serious because men who see the cancer of feminism and do nothing are the real enablers. These stupid feminist ideas and thinking only started because men passed laws to give feminism power. There were some men who were saying it isn't fair to give women special treatment but other men joined feminists and pushed for the unfair laws to be passed. It's those guys who are really to blame. Like male magistrates who know they are enforcing unfair laws but they are scared the feminists will shout at them if they don't.

 

[borro]

 

[Brenden_E]

This isn't a new idea. Historians have identified the pattern where loss in a society's masculine leadership and celebration of masculinity = ruin.
Interesting viewing -

Camille Paglia who responds in that video is a well known feminist.

 

[FapCop]

I don’t have to say much and can see your arguments getting dismantled in this forum . I am not engaging and merely chirping . If I were to engage you and prove you wrong you still would not admit it so why waste my energy typing on here

It's kind of like playing chess with a pidgeon. It just knocks over all the pieces, craps on the board then strut around as if it won the game.

 

[FapCop]

I think it is even more serious because men who see the cancer of feminism and do nothing are the real enablers. These stupid feminist ideas and thinking only started because men passed laws to give feminism power. There were some men who were saying it isn't fair to give women special treatment but other men joined feminists and pushed for the unfair laws to be passed. It's those guys who are really to blame. Like male magistrates who know they are enforcing unfair laws but they are scared the feminists will shout at them if they don't.

I think it goes a little deeper than that. I'm certain at least 90% of the married men following this thread will know exactly what I'm talking about. It's when there's an argument or a debate and the woman is hell bent on having the last say. Then you give her the last say. But then she's not satisfied with having the last say and wants to drag it on... I think this is the mentality we're looking at when it comes to modern feminism.

Where did feminism start? Pursuing equal rights, equal job opportunities, equal pay, the right to vote. This was a very fair campaign that even men supported. They came out victorious. They have equal rights, equal job opportunities, equal pay, the right to vote, etc etc etc. Today there is nothing a man can do in society that a woman can't. They got the last say. But they're clearly not satisfied with having the last say.

So what do you do when you need to fight a cause, but there's no enemy to fight? You start inventing new enemies.

Enter #metoo, #menaretrash and all the other childish crap we see today. When you have attained all the rights you were fighting for, but still want to fight, all that's left fighting for then is to take rights away from others. This is what feminism became today.

As you say, their male supporters is a huge problem. White knighting beta-male orbiters licking those boots just in case they get to smash that poon as a reward.

 

[FapCop]

Triple post, sorry

The image attached to this post is the endgame of modern feminism. Take a long look. This is what they ultimately want. Feminists will not stop until every man on earth is crawling behind a woman attached to her on a dog chain.

 

[Mila]

why do you guys even still want to marry woman is besides me.

In my opinion. Working in the wedding industry. Less people are not getting married because there are less men we find attractive. Men doesn't fall for the crap anymore. Every weekend The guys say. Well here we are. She wanted this.
In my opinion men would not get married if woman didn't make them. Yes men love their woman and does things to please them.

Seriously guys why marrige and screaming babies?
Just get a screw buddy.

 

[borro]

Triple post, sorry

The image attached to this post is the endgame of modern feminism. Take a long look. This is what they ultimately want. Feminists will not stop until every man on earth is crawling behind a woman attached to her on a dog chain.

thirsty

 

[Zarnicate]

why do you guys even still want to marry woman is besides me.

In my opinion. Working in the wedding industry. Less people are not getting married because there are less men we find attractive. Men doesn't fall for the crap anymore. Every weekend The guys say. Well here we are. She wanted this.
In my opinion men would not get married if woman didn't make them. Yes men love their woman and does things to please them.

Seriously guys why marrige and screaming babies?
Just get a screw buddy.

I have to agree with you. For some of us we were young and dumb but only got wise to late.
Problem is finding that FB.
Not a lot of woman into that and if you do get one after a while some start wanting more (get more serious....get married)

 

[Swa]

I think it goes a little deeper than that. I'm certain at least 90% of the married men following this thread will know exactly what I'm talking about. It's when there's an argument or a debate and the woman is hell bent on having the last say. Then you give her the last say. But then she's not satisfied with having the last say and wants to drag it on... I think this is the mentality we're looking at when it comes to modern feminism.

Where did feminism start? Pursuing equal rights, equal job opportunities, equal pay, the right to vote. This was a very fair campaign that even men supported. They came out victorious. They have equal rights, equal job opportunities, equal pay, the right to vote, etc etc etc. Today there is nothing a man can do in society that a woman can't. They got the last say. But they're clearly not satisfied with having the last say.

So what do you do when you need to fight a cause, but there's no enemy to fight? You start inventing new enemies.

Enter #metoo, #menaretrash and all the other childish crap we see today. When you have attained all the rights you were fighting for, but still want to fight, all that's left fighting for then is to take rights away from others. This is what feminism became today.

As you say, their male supporters is a huge problem. White knighting beta-male orbiters licking those boots just in case they get to smash that poon as a reward.

Exactly. They got all that they needed. When it comes to the law there is no reason for feminism to exist any more. They have equal rights and even more rights. If something is still wrong it's not because of rights.

Just look at the newest campaign now. Jail those accused of violence against women for life without bail. Do i need to remind anybody we have a legal system based on the principle of innocent until proven guilty? Women aren't innocent in this as they do cry rape to "get back" at a man.

Do we have a problem? Yes, but most people murdered are men. It's probably true that most murderers are men as well so it's not unjustified to look there but when it comes to domestic violence women are just as capable of dishing it out. Only difference is they get a free pass as in general women are seen as the weaker sex so "obviously" when a man is abused it's because he accepts it and has a choice. When it comes to the murder of a partner women aren't very far behind in being the perpetrators and you'll find infinite stories of women murdering their husbands for money or murdering them or another party out of revenge.

Yes we have a problem but it's a societal one. We should be focusing on long term solutions to fix our society and not just slap a quick band aid on it with more laws because of a misidentified boogeyman. Feminists should be standing central in this but ironically it goes completely over their heads as they've lost their nurturing mothering instinct and replaced it with something else.

 

[Emjay]

Emjay is showing what's wrong in this world. Even those claiming not to be feminists are falling for the feminist mantra without even being able to see it.

Oh, cry me a river. If the usual stereotypes about men were repeated on these forums in the same manner as in this thread, your soy boy posse would have been all over it in short order. This thread is not about men's rights. It's a bunch of MRAs / female feminist equivalents circle jerking.

I don’t have to say much and can see your arguments getting dismantled in this forum . I am not engaging and merely chirping . If I were to engage you and prove you wrong you still would not admit it so why waste my energy typing on here

I see you have run out of school yard insults, and engaged your brain a little? You should try that more often.

All I have done is interrupted the stream of male tears.

And, you should really try debunk any of my arguments head on, because I am interested to see what you actually disagree with.

It's probably true that most murderers are men as well

Riveting content right here, boyos.

 

[Emjay]

Triple post, sorry

The image attached to this post is the endgame of modern feminism. Take a long look. This is what they ultimately want. Feminists will not stop until every man on earth is crawling behind a woman attached to her on a dog chain.

Yes, that's what we totally want. All women are secretly into S&M, while at the same time are able to masterfully control the media, manipulate the legal systems in our favour and even brainwash many men. All so we can steal their money, make them subservient to fulfil our domestic needs and make sure we are treated like queens. Because we deserve no less.

The only way out is to live a life seeking cheap sexual interactions (because **some** men cannot control themselves when they don't get sex apparently), get a vasectomy, and never fall for the wiles of a female.

 

[Swa]

Oh, cry me a river. If the usual stereotypes about men were repeated on these forums in the same manner as in this thread, your soy boy posse would have been all over it in short order. This thread is not about men's rights. It's a bunch of MRAs / female feminist equivalents circle jerking.

You're right, it's not about men's rights. It's about women having more rights. You refuse to address this issue and continue to skirt around it.

View attachment 710187

Riveting content right here, boyos.

And somehow that's the only thing you got from this. Not considering why that is. Not considering that where men and women and equally involved it's much more split down the middle.

 

[Emjay]

You're right, it's not about men's rights. It's about women having more rights. You refuse to address this issue and continue to skirt around it.

And somehow that's the only thing you got from this. Not considering why that is. Not considering that where men and women and equally involved it's much more split down the middle.

Sorry - I cannot take your dissection of society seriously when you cannot even properly acknowledge that men commit the overwhelming share of violence. It's rather hilarious actually.