Microsoft embraces open source

Do you think Microsoft will start to embrace Open Source?

  • Yes

    Votes: 10 21.3%
  • No

    Votes: 37 78.7%

  • Total voters
    47
Microsoft violated GPL license and had to commit code as the article states, no embracing here only covering up.
Some observers, however, are less than enthusiastic, saying that this is nothing more than Microsoft looking to get itself out of a difficult spot. In particular observers such as Stephen Hemminger, an engineer engineer at OSS network vendor Vyatta, allege (http://linux-network-plumber.blogspot.com/2009/07/congratulations-microsoft.html) that Microsoft's Hyper-V drivers already contained GPL-licensed code mixed with proprietary code in violation of the GPL's terms. Hemminger suggests that Microsoft was aware of the violation and decided to release the drivers under the GPL to fix the problem.

no embracing here only covering up.
 
No, they did it because they were forced to, on the Hyper-V:

The truth revealed: MS was FORCED to open the Linux code ... http://ggx26.tk "GPL does not permit mixing of closed and open source parts"

The only altruism MS ever involve themselves in is if it can make them a buck, or as in this case: if it can save them a buck.
 
Last edited:
They are a commercial entity. They have shareholders. They are expected to make money. Why is this so shocking to all of you?

Linux makes plenty of money from training and services. I don't see anyone crying about that.

QQ fanbois
 
I have posted this before, but well worth posting again, Herewith worth from The Master, Glynn Moody:

http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2009/04/timeline-of-microsoft-hurt.html

A Timeline of Microsoft Hurt

I've often written about particular instances where Microsoft has bullied competitors; it's a pretty sorry tale. But that story becomes extraordinary when told in detail, and as a sequence of actions whose sole purpose was to drive off competition by any means.

If you're interested in how Microsoft sought to undermine DR-DOS, WordPerfect, Netscape and Java - to say nothing of GNU/Linux - you can find out here in this document from the European Committee for Interoperable Systems (ECIS). As you might guess from the subject matter of the report, this is a bunch of companies who are not overly enamoured of Microsoft:

ECIS has acted as an advocate of interoperability since its inception in 1989. The association believes strongly in the benefits of a competitive and innovative ICT sector, and seeks to support such an environment by actively participating in the promotion of any initiative aimed at favoring interoperability, competition on the merits, innovation, and consumers' interests in the area of information and communication technology.

ECIS’ members include large and smaller information and communications technology hardware and software providers Adobe Systems, Corel, IBM, Nokia, Opera, Oracle, RealNetworks, Red Hat, and Sun Microsystems.


Leaving aside the sad fact that a European organisation can't spell "favouring", it's pretty clear that this is not an objective, balanced picture. But as far as I can tell, it's not untruthful, and its statements are butteressed with references to relevant documents and news items that make it useful for further exploration.

get The Document : http://www.ecis.eu/documents/Finalversion_Consumerchoicepaper.pdf
Damn good read !!!
 
Wish they would do with DirectX. Would've jumped to Linux long ago if it supported all the latest games...
 
I'm sure Microsoft used this (at the very least) to try make Hyper-V a contender in the virtualisation market, and as far as Moodle is concerned... another tactic to punt and get people more reliant on Live. Very clever MS
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter