Microsoft versus Novell

rpm

Admin
Staff member
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
66,805
Reaction score
5,057
Location
Johannesburg
Novell versus Microsoft

A legal blame game between high-tech industry giants Novell Inc. and Microsoft Corp. is under way in a Salt Lake City courtroom as the companies squabble over fair business practices.
 
I don't get how Novell has any case at all. How and when Microsoft releases it's software surely is their business, right?
 
I don't get how Novell has any case at all. How and when Microsoft releases it's software surely is their business, right?

Johnson told jurors Microsoft used “deception” and the “classic bait and switch” when it led Novell to believe it was developing an operating system suited to WordPerfect. He contends Gates removed a key component from and delayed the release of Windows 95 to keep Novell from gaining a foothold in the emerging home computer software market.
 
WTF??? As far as I know you can use wordperfect on Win95 even the dos versions.. So what is the big problem?

The initial market share was lost. This could have made Novell a much stronger company.
 
I don't get how Novell has any case at all. How and when Microsoft releases it's software surely is their business, right?
Well it is quite unlikely to be as simple as that. Otherwise the whole anti-trust case that MS lost years ago would have been simply thrown out as well.
 
In order to understand the suit a person has to do a little recalling of the 100% IBM compatible PC (basically the computer which has remained on course as the mainstream "computer", hereinafter the "computer") of the early 1990's. Back in 1993 you had a situation where the vast majority of "computers" where running DOS either from IBM or from Microsoft (MSDOS) while you had a few computers running other operating systems in the form of OS/2 (also from IBM after Microsoft and IBM had a fallout) and the odd system running the devil of Unix in various forms. Of course the computer was back then a 386 or 486 (IIRC the Pentium was pretty much two years down the line) and RAM was a monsterously expensive commodity and a lot of belief existed that the CISC trajectory would be replaced by other superior systems such as your SPARC. Microsoft seemed somewhat idiotic to be putting so many eggs into the platform which they were.
Microsofts dominance in the ordinary computer market for the period was largely a product of its putting investment and faith into the platform while many other players (Apple, IBM, NeXT, Sun ...) appeared to be looking for the next big thing (it seems NeXT possibly did if you consider Comp Wars V: Apple Strikes Back) and focusing on the big corporate clients. Microsoft used their dominance to push their next generation technology over other players next generation technology in the form of Windows NT. IBM's OS/2 project was basically absorbed by Microsoft

Prior to Windows 95 and NT 4 Novell had dominance in the small networking section - anybody remember Windows 3.11 for Workgroups? Of course why use products from Novell (which you needed to pay for) when the Microsoft OS enabled you to do ("for free"). With Windows 95 Microsoft had attained something IBM previously had - nobody got fired for buying Microsoft products - giving it major pull in the enterprise market and it had the consumers buying into its products - you could get computers for reasonably cheep running Microsoft - it was only the hobbyists - and Bill Gates didn't like hobbyists ... - who it didn't have traction with.

Of course Novell has shifted gear into becoming an entangle Linux backer and they still have some mean products out there but can Novell ever get back to their early networking glory days without Microsoft being held to some sort of government randsom?

Now other products Novell got themselves involved in are the office suits - Wordperfect vs MSWord and it seems they are hoping that this highly lucrative market where quite frankly Microsoft has the most succesful products and Excel is a monster.
 
While at the top of the heap, Novel were extremely arrogant. They couldn't make a go of Wordperfect - they took the DOS product and tried to put a Windows wrapper around it, thereby producing a slow unstable product; this was exacerbated when they brought out the java version which was a bigger disaster. They didn't win any brownie points when they offered, via the internet, to give the product to anyone who wanted it.

The second major mistake made by Novel was to try and force NDS on the small user. It made Netware a more difficult product for the small shop, without experts, to deal with.

The final mistake Novel made was to keep on saying "Netware is not an OS, it's a NOS". Windows and Unix/Linus were OS's and therefore one could run applications on them. Novel's attempt at OS support, NLM's, were totally unstable, when an NLM crashed, so did the server. Also writing NLM's required very specialist development skills and thus there were very software houses writing apps, unlike the Windows and Unix/Linux markets.
 
so just because they couldn't actually provide a product that worked they are now upset.....bloody agents
 
While at the top of the heap, Novel were extremely arrogant. They couldn't make a go of Wordperfect - they took the DOS product and tried to put a Windows wrapper around it, thereby producing a slow unstable product; this was exacerbated when they brought out the java version which was a bigger disaster. They didn't win any brownie points when they offered, via the internet, to give the product to anyone who wanted it.

The second major mistake made by Novel was to try and force NDS on the small user. It made Netware a more difficult product for the small shop, without experts, to deal with.

The final mistake Novel made was to keep on saying "Netware is not an OS, it's a NOS". Windows and Unix/Linus were OS's and therefore one could run applications on them. Novel's attempt at OS support, NLM's, were totally unstable, when an NLM crashed, so did the server. Also writing NLM's required very specialist development skills and thus there were very software houses writing apps, unlike the Windows and Unix/Linux markets.

I beg to differ. NDS was easy to use once set up, maintain and support.

Even today eDir can give AD a run for its money.

Wordperfect was an abortion. Part of their failure is due to the old timer families running it with an iron fist and not allowing the young bloods their ideas.

This changed a while ago when the purchase of OpenSuSE was greenlighted. Unfortunately too little too late
Sent from my Desire HD using MyBroadband Android App
 
back in the day I loved Netware but lost interested due to 4.11.
At the time more SME's (JHB and CPT) used Lantastic than Netware.
Luckily I switched to MS (NT 3.51) and haven't looked back.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X