MP3 vs AIFF vs AAC vs . . .

Grant

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
69,728
Reaction score
38,246
Location
Behind the grassy knoll
so going thru a whole lot of music i realised massive amounts of space is being occupied by high bitrate tracks (AIFF - 3072kbps):
behold the screenshot - 5 tracks occupying the better half a gig of space.
Screen Shot 2024-05-19 at 07.50.09.jpg

i'm compelled to wonder at what point our ears can really discern the audible difference between a track at 3072 kbps and one of half the bit rate ?
is it really simply academic when one gets to really high bitrate music.

i use either sure or skullkandy earphones, or the music is played thru a krell amp and martin logan speakers - despite fairly good quality audio equipment, more often than not i cannot really hear any difference between a 160MB AIFF track with huge bitrate & an AAC 256kbps 8MB size track.

Am i losing my hearing, or my mind ?
 
Bru
1. the issue is not the 3072kbps, it's the songs, WTF?!
2. people rocking a krell amp and martin logan speakers cannot be seen with 320kpbs.
 
an example - 2 tracks side by side, one AIFF & the other MP3 - screenshots taken at the same time stamp - i'm not really hearing much difference


AIFF
AIFF.jpg




MP3
mp3.jpg
 
I know you're asking serious questions but I cannot help myself.

I googled yeke yeke and it's the most 2000's thing I've seen in years.
 
I know you're asking serious questions but I cannot help myself.

I googled yeke yeke and it's the most 2000's thing I've seen in years.
indeed - it is in a "south african" playlist - although he is not south african.
that being said - i can offer you a choice of another 3000 or so tracks sitting idle on this lappie
Screen Shot 2024-05-19 at 08.51.51.jpg


or maybe 900 or so music videos
Screen Shot 2024-05-19 at 08.58.52.jpg

by god, there has to be something in there to please you !!
 
Properly encoded (split stereo, highest complexity, low pass 18Hz, high cut 20kHz), 320kbps mpeg1 layer 3 is transparent to lossless unless you're using really high end equipment in a tuned environment.

I've found even on an analytical setup, 640kbps opus at full encoding complexity is fully transparent to lossless

But you said skullcandy, so ima say 320k mp3 is fine for your use case

Ps. Aac is meh, the apple encoder is the best encoding tool but it's a pain to use cli. Opus is much nicer imo
 
To be honest just convert it all to flac and maintain the lossless to it. The processing overhead vs Aiff doesn't matter with any processor/dac made in the last 10 years
 
What are you listening on? That is what ultimately makes the difference.

Also, not everyone can hear everything.

***

Oh Skullcandy. In that case you don’t need much more than 256~VBR.
 
What are you listening on? That is what ultimately makes the difference.

Also, not everyone can hear everything.

***

Oh Skullcandy. In that case you don’t need much more than 256~VBR.
sure or skullcandy - depends.
the sure earphones seem to leave my ears a little "fatigued" after a hour or two at high volume.

dont be knocking the skullcandy titaniums tho - they produce infinately better sound than the bose i had (still have somewhere).
for their money, the skullcandy manages to produce a very nice tight low frequency bass and crisp high end, without sounding hissy.

having said that, my father was an audio nut - in perpetual pursuit of perfection - some outlandish equipment, including a pair of speakers the size of coffins weighing in at around 80kg each.
in his defence, the "coffins" produced an incredible sound stage.
ive not heard anything close to them since
 
Properly encoded (split stereo, highest complexity, low pass 18Hz, high cut 20kHz), 320kbps mpeg1 layer 3 is transparent to lossless unless you're using really high end equipment in a tuned environment.

I've found even on an analytical setup, 640kbps opus at full encoding complexity is fully transparent to lossless
ta

never tried opus - will explore shortly
 
Properly encoded (split stereo, highest complexity, low pass 18Hz, high cut 20kHz), 320kbps mpeg1 layer 3 is transparent to lossless unless you're using really high end equipment in a tuned environment.

I've found even on an analytical setup, 640kbps opus at full encoding complexity is fully transparent to lossless



Ps. Aac is meh, the apple encoder is the best encoding tool but it's a pain to use cli. Opus is much nicer imo
so i'm seeing "audacity" (mac), supports opus

Screen Shot 2024-05-19 at 09.39.41.jpg
 
so i'm seeing "audacity" (mac), supports opus

View attachment 1711491
Start with audacity but I'd reccomend the official opusenc tool if you are happy in a command line. That way you know it's the latest version and it will be easy to do a batch conversion

 
As a starting point try
Complexity = 10
Framesize = 20 ms
Bitrate per channel = 256 kbps

Leave scene detection on auto. Leave vbr mode on auto, do not use cvbr or hard cbr
so i tried a track "love kills" - freddie mercury.

opus version seems to have a bit more "depth" and "layering" - its hard to describe.
most definitely going to explore some more.

thanx
 
Start with audacity but I'd reccomend the official opusenc tool if you are happy in a command line. That way you know it's the latest version and it will be easy to do a batch conversion

i figured audacity would be a good simple place to start.
going straight to opusenc for mac seems to involve downloading "macports" & xcode".

for now audacity will work as a "trial run", but i suspect i'll migrate to opusenc
 
Hey, give the man a break, it’s not Victor Uwaifo.
hell, earlier on in the same south african playlist i was listening to"
pata pata
weekend special
i never loved a man
and
the click song

i have no shame, and i wear my "shameless" badge with pride !!
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X