Saw this exchange today on local DC hub ..
"<A> has anybody got a sentech 512k accounbt for me
<B> Sentec have implemented a system where they only allow one login per username
<A> yip
<A> buggers"
Does this mean that there really was a problem, that was actively being abused, that allowed multiple users to log in with the same username simultaneously? And that it's now been fixed? I read here somewhere the other day that this was acknowledged and was going to be fixed "on the 4th" and this seems to tie in with that. Man, that's bad, that's really terrible, that could explain a huge amount of bandwidth loss. How could ST have been so dumb as to have such a flaw in the system for so long? Hehe, never mind, that's rhetorical. But of course such a flaw was going to be abused. Is there any improvement now?
"<A> has anybody got a sentech 512k accounbt for me
<B> Sentec have implemented a system where they only allow one login per username
<A> yip
<A> buggers"
Does this mean that there really was a problem, that was actively being abused, that allowed multiple users to log in with the same username simultaneously? And that it's now been fixed? I read here somewhere the other day that this was acknowledged and was going to be fixed "on the 4th" and this seems to tie in with that. Man, that's bad, that's really terrible, that could explain a huge amount of bandwidth loss. How could ST have been so dumb as to have such a flaw in the system for so long? Hehe, never mind, that's rhetorical. But of course such a flaw was going to be abused. Is there any improvement now?