MWEB P2P vs JINX

[hambone]

Hi Folk;

... click for bigger apparently.

Basically the above graph is a manipulated image of my traffic graph from the P2P machine [GREEN] vs the JINX total graph [BLUE] over 24 hours. In essence I was trying to show the correlation between the MWEB shaping rules and the general load on the network. I think its a bit of a success; The shaper seems to be doing what its supposed to be doing; though the gaps may indicate some profiteering.

So, what are your thoughts? What do you think shows in the graph? I plan on making a more concerted stab at this when I have some more time and a router that doesn't grind my nipples.

 

[Chevron]

Looks good. I like the idea.

 

[techead]

awesome stuff, now we talking! But you gonna put MWEB out of business and add many names to my thread

 

[Tinuva]

Hi Folk;

... click for bigger apparently.

Basically the above graph is a manipulated image of my traffic graph from the P2P machine [GREEN] vs the JINX total graph [BLUE] over 24 hours. In essence I was trying to show the correlation between the MWEB shaping rules and the general load on the network. I think its a bit of a success; The shaper seems to be doing what its supposed to be doing; though the gaps may indicate some profiteering.

So, what are your thoughts? What do you think shows in the graph? I plan on making a more concerted stab at this when I have some more time and a router that doesn't grind my nipples.

Spot on.

The JINX graphs correlates to traffic you see mostly in Business hours, so you can technically classify that as Business traffic, which for obvious reasons take preference over casual download/p2p traffic, for one the Business users pay more than the average consumer, and I am sure there are more small business making use of M-Web uncapped accounts than you will imagine.