Cosmik Debris
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2021
- Messages
- 39,944
- Reaction score
- 38,552
Why, who set a time limit on reparations?
So, can I claim reparations from the Italians for what the Romans did to my Germanic ancestors 2000 years ago?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Why, who set a time limit on reparations?
Yep, you got it. Strangely East Asia has a low level of Denisovan, higher than European level of Neanderthal genes.We? Let me help you with some anthropology:
Negroid - H sapien genes only
Caucasian - H sapien and Neanderthal genes
Mongoloid - H sapien, Neanderthal and Denisovan genes.
Looks like German is already on the way out up there in the north in South West.
They bought those items. And no country has commercial ownership of written/spoken language.
They largely used slave labour.The present Namibian government paid the Germans for Namibia's infrastructure? How much and when?
If so, who captured those slaves and sold them into slavery?They largely used slave labour.
We? Let me help you with some anthropology:
Negroid - H sapien genes only
Caucasian - H sapien and Neanderthal genes
Mongoloid - H sapien, Neanderthal and Denisovan genes.
They largely used slave labour.
Should highlight the relevant part. States 0.3% DNA of Africans are neanderthal DNA, which is how I recalled it as well.We? Let me help you with some anthropology:
Negroid - H sapien genes only
Caucasian - H sapien and Neanderthal genes
Mongoloid - H sapien, Neanderthal and Denisovan genes.

Should highlight the relevant part. States 0.3% DNA of Africans are neanderthal DNA, which is how I recalled it as well.
![]()
Interbreeding between archaic and modern humans - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Now the pertitent question - would you?
View attachment 1039994
Should highlight the relevant part. States 0.3% DNA of Africans are neanderthal DNA, which is how I recalled it as well.
![]()
Interbreeding between archaic and modern humans - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Now the pertitent question - would you?
View attachment 1039994
On a serious note though, as our methods become more advanced to test, I would expect new info like this to come to light. The study appears to be legit - I don't see any red flags.This is a very recent claim and yet to be verified. It appears in the MSM and the Google algorithm has bubbled it to the top of Google searches as well pointing to a leftist narrative and claim with very spurious verification. The Neanderthal gene was found in North Africa, which is correct as the people are Caucasian. The Neanderthal nor Denisovan gene has never been found in Sub Saharan Bantu Africans.
Prof Daniel Reich of Harvard has never found the Neanderthal gene in Sub Saharan Africa except in the Khoisan:
Professor Daniel Reich of Harvard University recently published a properly researched paper into the genealogy of races and peoples and he came to a conclusion which is generally accepted by historians and anthropologists all over the world.
According to this study there was a huge migration of people from Africa about 60 000- 65000 years ago. On their way north, these people met and mixed with the Neanderthal people around the Mediterranean. This Neanderthal gene enabled prof Reich to determine the genealogical links between groups of people. He discovered the gene in the DNA of the western European people of Spain, Sardinia, Corsica, Italy, French Provence and Portugal. The same gene he discovered in the Khoisan descendants, BUT NOT in the Bantu Southern African. Which means that the distant ancestor of both the Khoisan and the European was in Southern Africa thousands of years before any Bantu person migrated south.
Professor Reich further argues that a second migration from Europe southwards, carrying the Neanderthal-gene, took place around 3000 years ago and a final injection of European genes into the Khoisan happened roundabout 900-1800 years ago, hundreds of years before the first recorded contact between Europeans and black Africans.
SOURCE: Newscientist.com
Catharine Brahic
“Humanity’s forgotten return to Africa revealed in DNA”
Though not exactly have those attributes, rather age and still a looker, that's how I sprained my ankle; going over a 6 foot wall because the gate was opening, yet she was asleep, realized HKGK.You never went on a binger when young and woken up to similar plus obese and sneaked out as quietly as possible wondering where your car was?
The gene that causes red hair in modern humans is not the same as that in Neanderthals. At least, according to the internet.Red hair is deadly. You know where red hair comes from, right?
Though not exactly have those attributes, rather age and still a looker, that's how I sprained my ankle; going over a 6 foot wall because the gate was opening, yet she was asleep, realized HKGK.
Dr. Svante Pääbo, Max Planck Institute. This is recent:This is a very recent claim and yet to be verified. The source being Wiki makes it dubious as well. It appears in the MSM and the Google algorithm has bubbled it to the top of Google searches as well pointing to a leftist narrative and claim with very spurious verification. The Neanderthal gene was found in North Africa, which is correct as the people are Caucasian. The Neanderthal nor Denisovan gene has never been found in Sub Saharan Bantu Africans.
Prof Daniel Reich of Harvard has never found the Neanderthal gene in Sub Saharan Africa except in the Khoisan:
Professor Daniel Reich of Harvard University recently published a properly researched paper into the genealogy of races and peoples and he came to a conclusion which is generally accepted by historians and anthropologists all over the world.
According to this study there was a huge migration of people from Africa about 60 000- 65000 years ago. On their way north, these people met and mixed with the Neanderthal people around the Mediterranean. This Neanderthal gene enabled prof Reich to determine the genealogical links between groups of people. He discovered the gene in the DNA of the western European people of Spain, Sardinia, Corsica, Italy, French Provence and Portugal. The same gene he discovered in the Khoisan descendants, BUT NOT in the Bantu Southern African. Which means that the distant ancestor of both the Khoisan and the European was in Southern Africa thousands of years before any Bantu person migrated south.
Professor Reich further argues that a second migration from Europe southwards, carrying the Neanderthal-gene, took place around 3000 years ago and a final injection of European genes into the Khoisan happened roundabout 900-1800 years ago, hundreds of years before the first recorded contact between Europeans and black Africans.
SOURCE: Newscientist.com
Catharine Brahic
“Humanity’s forgotten return to Africa revealed in DNA”
There are three groupings of origins. The West European one apparently is, along with some other negative things. I was digging into that a while ago, also stumbled across all other types of things ...The gene that causes red hair in modern humans is not the same as that in Neanderthals. At least, according to the internet.
Dr. Svante Pääbo, Max Planck Institute. This is recent:
On a serious note though, as our methods become more advanced to test, I would expect new info like this to come to light. The study appears to be legit - I don't see any red flags.
Back migration into Africa caused this mix of DNA into Africans.
On a serious note though, as our methods become more advanced to test, I would expect new info like this to come to light. The study appears to be legit - I don't see any red flags.
Back migration into Africa caused this mix of DNA into Africans.
It's how science works. Dude...So, how come the Neanderthal DNA is only being found now? National Geographic has been running DNA tests for ages on all continents for ages. Alarm bells ringing.