Namibia Seeks German Aid for Genocide Reparations

We? Let me help you with some anthropology:

Negroid - H sapien genes only
Caucasian - H sapien and Neanderthal genes
Mongoloid - H sapien, Neanderthal and Denisovan genes.
Yep, you got it. Strangely East Asia has a low level of Denisovan, higher than European level of Neanderthal genes.

Let's overlay the world IQ map on top of that ...

:ROFL:
 
Looks like German is already on the way out up there in the north in South West.

In any populated town German is still used because German tourists have money. That's what counts, not ideology.
 
We? Let me help you with some anthropology:

Negroid - H sapien genes only
Caucasian - H sapien and Neanderthal genes
Mongoloid - H sapien, Neanderthal and Denisovan genes.
tenor.gif
 
They largely used slave labour.

Careful. You're going to have egg on your face if your grasp of history is tenuous. The only slaves in German South West Africa, now known as Namibia, were the slaves of the Bantu Herero invaders from Angola. The Germans never used slave labour in Namibia.

So the question remains, how much did the Namibian government pay the Germans for the infrastructure they built, how much and when?
 
Should highlight the relevant part. States 0.3% DNA of Africans are neanderthal DNA, which is how I recalled it as well.


Now the pertitent question - would you?

View attachment 1039994

This is a very recent claim and yet to be verified. The source being Wiki makes it dubious as well. It appears in the MSM and the Google algorithm has bubbled it to the top of Google searches as well pointing to a leftist narrative and claim with very spurious verification. The Neanderthal gene was found in North Africa, which is correct as the people are Caucasian. The Neanderthal nor Denisovan gene has never been found in Sub Saharan Bantu Africans.

Prof Daniel Reich of Harvard has never found the Neanderthal gene in Sub Saharan Africa except in the Khoisan:

Professor Daniel Reich of Harvard University recently published a properly researched paper into the genealogy of races and peoples and he came to a conclusion which is generally accepted by historians and anthropologists all over the world.

According to this study there was a huge migration of people from Africa about 60 000- 65000 years ago. On their way north, these people met and mixed with the Neanderthal people around the Mediterranean. This Neanderthal gene enabled prof Reich to determine the genealogical links between groups of people. He discovered the gene in the DNA of the western European people of Spain, Sardinia, Corsica, Italy, French Provence and Portugal. The same gene he discovered in the Khoisan descendants, BUT NOT in the Bantu Southern African. Which means that the distant ancestor of both the Khoisan and the European was in Southern Africa thousands of years before any Bantu person migrated south.

Professor Reich further argues that a second migration from Europe southwards, carrying the Neanderthal-gene, took place around 3000 years ago and a final injection of European genes into the Khoisan happened roundabout 900-1800 years ago, hundreds of years before the first recorded contact between Europeans and black Africans.

SOURCE: Newscientist.com
Catharine Brahic
“Humanity’s forgotten return to Africa revealed in DNA”
 
This is a very recent claim and yet to be verified. It appears in the MSM and the Google algorithm has bubbled it to the top of Google searches as well pointing to a leftist narrative and claim with very spurious verification. The Neanderthal gene was found in North Africa, which is correct as the people are Caucasian. The Neanderthal nor Denisovan gene has never been found in Sub Saharan Bantu Africans.

Prof Daniel Reich of Harvard has never found the Neanderthal gene in Sub Saharan Africa except in the Khoisan:

Professor Daniel Reich of Harvard University recently published a properly researched paper into the genealogy of races and peoples and he came to a conclusion which is generally accepted by historians and anthropologists all over the world.

According to this study there was a huge migration of people from Africa about 60 000- 65000 years ago. On their way north, these people met and mixed with the Neanderthal people around the Mediterranean. This Neanderthal gene enabled prof Reich to determine the genealogical links between groups of people. He discovered the gene in the DNA of the western European people of Spain, Sardinia, Corsica, Italy, French Provence and Portugal. The same gene he discovered in the Khoisan descendants, BUT NOT in the Bantu Southern African. Which means that the distant ancestor of both the Khoisan and the European was in Southern Africa thousands of years before any Bantu person migrated south.

Professor Reich further argues that a second migration from Europe southwards, carrying the Neanderthal-gene, took place around 3000 years ago and a final injection of European genes into the Khoisan happened roundabout 900-1800 years ago, hundreds of years before the first recorded contact between Europeans and black Africans.

SOURCE: Newscientist.com
Catharine Brahic
“Humanity’s forgotten return to Africa revealed in DNA”
On a serious note though, as our methods become more advanced to test, I would expect new info like this to come to light. The study appears to be legit - I don't see any red flags.

Back migration into Africa caused this mix of DNA into Africans.
 
Now the pertitent question - would you?

View attachment 1039994

Red hair is deadly. You know where red hair comes from, right?

You never went on a binger when young and woken up to similar plus obese and sneaked out as quietly as possible wondering where your car was?
Though not exactly have those attributes, rather age and still a looker, that's how I sprained my ankle; going over a 6 foot wall because the gate was opening, yet she was asleep, realized HKGK.
 
Red hair is deadly. You know where red hair comes from, right?


Though not exactly have those attributes, rather age and still a looker, that's how I sprained my ankle; going over a 6 foot wall because the gate was opening, yet she was asleep, realized HKGK.
The gene that causes red hair in modern humans is not the same as that in Neanderthals. At least, according to the internet.
 
This is a very recent claim and yet to be verified. The source being Wiki makes it dubious as well. It appears in the MSM and the Google algorithm has bubbled it to the top of Google searches as well pointing to a leftist narrative and claim with very spurious verification. The Neanderthal gene was found in North Africa, which is correct as the people are Caucasian. The Neanderthal nor Denisovan gene has never been found in Sub Saharan Bantu Africans.

Prof Daniel Reich of Harvard has never found the Neanderthal gene in Sub Saharan Africa except in the Khoisan:

Professor Daniel Reich of Harvard University recently published a properly researched paper into the genealogy of races and peoples and he came to a conclusion which is generally accepted by historians and anthropologists all over the world.

According to this study there was a huge migration of people from Africa about 60 000- 65000 years ago. On their way north, these people met and mixed with the Neanderthal people around the Mediterranean. This Neanderthal gene enabled prof Reich to determine the genealogical links between groups of people. He discovered the gene in the DNA of the western European people of Spain, Sardinia, Corsica, Italy, French Provence and Portugal. The same gene he discovered in the Khoisan descendants, BUT NOT in the Bantu Southern African. Which means that the distant ancestor of both the Khoisan and the European was in Southern Africa thousands of years before any Bantu person migrated south.

Professor Reich further argues that a second migration from Europe southwards, carrying the Neanderthal-gene, took place around 3000 years ago and a final injection of European genes into the Khoisan happened roundabout 900-1800 years ago, hundreds of years before the first recorded contact between Europeans and black Africans.

SOURCE: Newscientist.com
Catharine Brahic
“Humanity’s forgotten return to Africa revealed in DNA”
Dr. Svante Pääbo, Max Planck Institute. This is recent:
 
The gene that causes red hair in modern humans is not the same as that in Neanderthals. At least, according to the internet.
There are three groupings of origins. The West European one apparently is, along with some other negative things. I was digging into that a while ago, also stumbled across all other types of things ...

Anyway, if it is, thank you for Neanderthals ;)
 
Dr. Svante Pääbo, Max Planck Institute. This is recent:

Yeesh! 52 minutes, I'm not watching that. But here's something from the Max Planck Institute:

Stephen Schiffels, head of the Max Planck Institute’s Population Genetics Group, and his team have published the unprecedented findings in the May 30 Nature Communications Journal, reports Live Science. It turns out, ancient Egyptians had more in common genetically to people from today’s Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan and Iraq.

The team compared the samples from the mummies with DNA (both ancient and modern) from people living between Egypt and Ethiopia. The results: DNA sequences over the span of 1,300 years didn’t change much, despite the fact that Egypt’s population was influence by both Roman and Greek invasions, according to findings. However, when the same set was compared to the DNA of modern Egyptians, a stark difference was the absence of sub-Saharan ancestry, which is prevalent in today’s population.


Remember when all the black inventors and ancient civilisation that whites stole gumpf was going around? Egypt was claimed to be a black civilisation by those proponents. This blew that idea out of the water.
 
On a serious note though, as our methods become more advanced to test, I would expect new info like this to come to light. The study appears to be legit - I don't see any red flags.

Back migration into Africa caused this mix of DNA into Africans.

So, how come the Neanderthal DNA is only being found now? National Geographic has been running DNA tests on all continents for ages. Alarm bells ringing.
 
Last edited:
On a serious note though, as our methods become more advanced to test, I would expect new info like this to come to light. The study appears to be legit - I don't see any red flags.

Back migration into Africa caused this mix of DNA into Africans.

You don't take me quoting Prof Daniel Reich, the top Geneticist at Harvard, as serious?
 
So, how come the Neanderthal DNA is only being found now? National Geographic has been running DNA tests for ages on all continents for ages. Alarm bells ringing.
It's how science works. Dude...
Nothing is set in stone. Open that closed little mind a lil.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X