Naspers staff protest Zanu print

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
49,747
Reaction score
21,486
Location
Durbanville, Cape Town
http://www.fin24.com/articles/default/display_article.aspx?Nav=ns&ArticleID=1518-24_2346108

Jun 24 2008 2:51PM
Fin24.com reporter
Johannesburg - Ton Vosloo, the chairperson of media company Naspers, will be asked to support a petition requesting the media group to donate proceeds from printing election material for Zimbabwe's Zanu-PF to charities in that country.
This comes following reports in Business Day, Beeld and Die Burger that the Gauteng branch of Naspers subsidiary Paarl Web printed election documentation for the political party.

"All our newspapers have in the past taken a strong stand against any organisation which financially or otherwise supported the regime of President Robert Mugabe," the petition to Vosloo reads. "We were also very critical about the way our own government handled the Zimbabwe situation.

"The personal experience and journalistic evidence of several of our Naspers colleagues who reported from Zimbabwe during the past few years, very often under dangerous and unstable conditions, showed without a shadow of a doubt that these viewpoints were correct.

"In the light of this we believe that the acceptance of the Zanu-PF contract constitutes, at the very least, a very serious lack of judgment and we would hope that Naspers, as the parent company of Paarl Web, would acknowledge this."

"We therefore believe it appropriate that the R3m that Paarl Web apparently received for this contract be given to organisations which aims to alleviate the plight of the people of Zimbabwe."

Paarl Web Gauteng's general manager, Jandre de Milander, told Beeld that the printing order came from a South African agent, and that Paarl Web did not know it was for Zanu-PF.

No response

It is not clear how much money the company received or who the agent acting on Zanu-PF's behalf is.

Paarl Web did not respond to Fin24.com's request for comment, while Naspers' investor relations head Meloy Horn was unavailable.

De Milander told Beeld that the company does a lot of printing for African countries and political parties, including the ANC, he said.

De Milander said that if the company had known that the print run was for Zanu-PF, the company would've thought twice about undertaking the work.

Business Day reported on June 13 that the agent had initially approached Caxton to print "a million copies of a high-quality booklet on why people should vote Zanu-PF".

The paper said R3m had been transferred by the Zimbabwean central bank into Caxton's accounts, but the company refused the job after its chairperson, Frederik Van Zyl Slabbert, threatened to resign had Caxton accepted it.

Staffers intend to deliver the petition to Naspers' chairperson Ton Vosloo on Wednesday June 25.

A million copies with Vote for Zanu-PF on the cover and they ' did not know ' ?!

Seems dishonesty is rife and greed is king.

Naspers/Paarlweb you are a disgrace and Caxton as well.
 
Some more on this one...

http://www.moneyweb.co.za/mw/view/mw/en/page39?oid=212074&sn=Detail


My first call to get conformation of the story was to Naspers' head of Investor Relations Meloy Horn who informed me she was unaware of the story but would investigate and revert back to me within an hour.

Seven hours later she would not confirm whether Paarl Media did in fact print the ZanuPF pamphlets, nor would she confirm that Paarl Media is a subsidiary of Naspers. She advised that the story: "Was not a head office issue" and that I would need to speak to Stephen van der Walt, Paarl Media's CEO.

His cellphone was off so I called his office where I was advised to speak to Paarl Media's Gauteng division, Paarl Web. The product of a BEE partnership between Paarl Media Group and loveLife!'s Kurisani Investments, Paarl Web's stakeholders include the US-based Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and the South African Government, while the printer's BEE partners receive their major funding from the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

At Paarl Web I first spoke to Press Manager Kevin Wright who issued a terse "no comment" and put the phone down on me. This was followed by a call to Jandré de Milander, MD of Paarl Web who advised me that the job was briefed to them by an existing South African client and that they were paid in South African rands for the job.

He refused to name his client citing that he had signed a confidentiality agreement. When asked what he felt about Paarl Web doing work for Mugabe's regime he answered: "It is irrelevant what my feelings now are. This has nothing to do with you. Is ZanuPF a terrorist organization? Why shouldn't we do business with them? I have nothing further to say to you. I can't give you any further comment."

Finally I spoke to Stephen van der Walt, CEO of the Paarl Media Group who asked that I strike all previous comments from the record, as those contacted were not part of the communications team.

Van der Walt confirmed that the print job had been given to them by an existing client. That an up front deposit was requested as the job exceeded the client's credit limit with Paarl Media. Van der Walt maintains that the quoting and the briefing on the job were done blind without the sales person or production team viewing the material in question. He went on to say that the job was then slotted into their digital production process without anyone seeing what the job was.

"I want to state categorically that we did not know at all that it was a ZanuPF job. It was printed inadvertently at Paarl Gauteng, which is part of our group. We had no interface with ZanuPF, we never received payment from ZanuPF and we have no relationship with anyone from ZanuPF. Mugabe's party placed the order, provided for it and paid for it through a South African company which is our client," said van der Walt.

Van der Walt went on to explain that the only screening policy the printing group has is against pornography which is easily identifiable. He refused to name the client but stated he would try and raise the client, to get their permission to be named or interviewed. At the time of going to press this information was yet forthcoming. When asked whether his group would do business with this client again he stated: "It would be doubtful under these circumstances. It is unlikely that we will be doing business with them again."
 
Disgusting. There is very little I wouldnt do in the business world to make a fortune, but I am quite sure I would have turned away this business...
 
Disgusting. There is very little I wouldnt do in the business world to make a fortune, but I am quite sure I would have turned away this business...

Sounds like the old Swiss excuse. We didn't know the gold was Nazi gold... mutter, mutter... confidentiality... mumble mumble... Nazi's were not a terrorist organisation (sure, they killed 6 million Jews and took their gold, which we now have... mutter mutter... we're neutral in this... mumble mumble... we don't investigate our clients or ask where it comes from.

Yup, these printing companies are just as guilty.
 
Well someone had to authorise the print on their side! And they would have had to have sent it off to the client for approval as well, surely?
 
"I want to state categorically that we did not know at all that it was a ZanuPF job. It was printed inadvertently at Paarl Gauteng, which is part of our group. We had no interface with ZanuPF, we never received payment from ZanuPF and we have no relationship with anyone from ZanuPF. Mugabe's party placed the order, provided for it and paid for it through a South African company which is our client," said van der Walt.

Van der Walt went on to explain that the only screening policy the printing group has is against pornography which is easily identifiable.

This is the rich part, if no-one looks at the things (like illustrated by this Zanu-PF thing as he explains it), how can they catch porn?

liar liar pants on fire!
 
Its a load of hog wash - are they publicly stating that they have absolutely no quality control measures?

Pornography is the only screening process? So did they not screen this one? Or do they have a magic BCR machine (Boob character recognition)
 
Where the hell did the money for the print job come from???

They cannot print their own money because they have not money for the security ink, but 1 mill glossy booklets???

Naspers giving a donation??:mad::mad:
 
Where the hell did the money for the print job come from???

They cannot print their own money because they have not money for the security ink, but 1 mill glossy booklets???

Naspers giving a donation??:mad::mad:

The article states that the payment and order both came from a South Afican company with whom they do business with already. Likely story...
 
The article states that the payment and order both came from a South Afican company with whom they do business with already. Likely story...

Thanks for that, would be interesting to see where the company gets it revenue from for this deal...:confused:

Hopefully M&G or Noseweek pick up on this one.
 
The MD of Media24 stated on 702 that there is no one there to make editorial (i think that was the word he used) decisions. It is wholly possible that the persons at the place where printing takes place do not have power to make decisions. Porn is pretty obvious to most I would guess so it's a pretty easy directive to follow.

Also if you are a worker at a printing press and a regular customer comes with a job, it is likely you will do the printing as you will think about your job first.

From Naspers side, it will be the next step that they take which will reflect on them. Although really they should have preempted any exposure.

I thought Caxton had refused the job so why shame on them daveza?
 
Caxton was originally offered the job and accepted it together with a 3 Million Rand deposit.

This came / was bought to the attention of Frederick Van Zyl Slabbert, chairperson of Caxton, who threatened to resign should they accept the job.


But it's funny how Van Zyl Slabbert was aware of the content when Caxton didn't even print a single copy - yet Naspers / Paarl Web had no idea they had been printed ?!

When these were being printed nobody noticed a million copies, probably with mad bobs face on the cover ?

If 3 thousand was the deposit, at say R10 a book, Ten million Rand at least must have come into the country from Zimbabwe to end up at Paarl Web.
Nobody is curious when ten million pops into your bank account ?

Sies !
 
According to CTP, they accepted the job not having seen the print. When they noticed the payment had come from the Zim Reserve Bank they immediately withdraw acceptance. The management then took the decision to the board to ratify. Which the board did. They say Van Zyl Slabbert didn't even need to threaten to resign.

EDIT: I heard the above on 702 from the reporter that's running the story on moneyweb or marketingweb.
 
Last edited:
I'm very curious to hear her followup regarding the SA firm who brokered the deal.
 
That's a load of bollocks. A quality control officer would have to look at the printing at various stages of the print run to ensure consistency through out.
 
That's a load of bollocks. A quality control officer would have to look at the printing at various stages of the print run to ensure consistency through out.

I know nothing about the printing process. Will this quality control person have the power to make decisions on what can and can’t be printed? Is quality control checking to see that what is printed looks like the proof?

Having dealt with many South Africans in different companies, it is not surprising to me that someone would not use their initiative when faced with such an issue. Especially when the order is from a long standing client.

My experience of most staff on the ground is that they do not like to deviate from scenarios and criteria they have been given. Which is why for the moment I am giving Naspers the benefit of the doubt. Maybe in addition to pornography, Naspers should say that all political material is referred to management.
 
Mugabe’s man unmasked

http://www.moneyweb.co.za/mw/view/mw/en/page39?oid=212293&sn=Detail


Mugabe’s man unmasked
SA Soccer’s marketing man brokered the deal that saw Naspers print 130 tons of propaganda for Robert Mugabe. Mandy de Waal follows her breaking story.

Mandy de Waal*
25 Jun 2008 07:37

In a week when Naspers (JSE: NPN) should be celebrating buoyant financial results, the multinational media company faces a reputation scandal that sees it linked by a trail of blood money to Robert Mubabe's terror filled tyranny. This after Naspers subsidiary, Paarl Web Gauteng, printed 130 tons of propaganda, worth R2,6m, for Zanu-PF.

Amidst strong media interest and growing public anger, journalists and staffers at the organization petitioned Chairman Ton Vosloo to donate all revenue received from the contract to Zimbabwe relief organizations. Naspers' own Fin24.com reported yesterday that the petition reads: "...we believe that the acceptance of the Zanu-PF contract constitutes, at the very least, a very serious lack of judgment and we would hope that Naspers, as the parent company of Paarl Web, would acknowledge this. We therefore believe it appropriate that the R3m that Paarl Web apparently received for this contract be given to organisations which aims to alleviate the plight of the people of Zimbabwe."

Paarl Web CEO Stephen van der Walt confirmed that some funds would be given to an appropriate charity. "We will find a suitable fund supporting victims and will make a small donation," said van der Walt adding: "I cannot attribute the exact profit figure for the job, but we will donate in the region of R250k to R350k to a suitable fund."

Van der Walt refused to name the broker or individual who brought the job to his company, citing a confidentiality agreement but stated that work on the pamphlet was done by a large Johannesburg based ‘creative house' which did work for Zanu-PF. He added it was a company that regularly placed significant sized jobs with large printers in South Africa, including retail jobs. He said they were a well respected business client and that Paarl Web had done print work for them in the past. He also said that they were not a retailer, and that retailers at times place their work direct with printers and not through their creative agencies.

After speaking to Van der Walt I received a phone call from a trusted source who agreed to speak to me on condition of anonymity. This person said the man who brokered the Mugabe print job was Peter Mancer, and that Mancer had also originally briefed the job into Caxton, which refused to run the print. I left a message with van der Walt to confirm this, but did not hear from him again.

Peter Mancer is no stranger to controversy. The Premier Soccer League marketing man was in the news last year when a gravy train story broke about soccer bosses pocketing millions following a slew of sponsorship deals. At the time Cape Argus reported that Mancer's company, Diversity Management, had "a clause in his contract that gives him 10 percent of any PSL sponsorship deal." A phone call to the PSL revealed that Mancer was in Australia where he was: "watching the soccer." The PSL would not provide his mobile number saying it was PSL policy not to do so.

I was unable to confirm with Naspers whether Mancer was in fact Mugabe's man, however there are links between the PSL and Naspers. Touchline Media's special projects division custom publishes PSL magazines. Late last year Touchline (a Naspers subsidiary) was implicated in the circulation audit scam that rocked Naspers and Media24. Then the PSL struck a R1 billion deal (over five years) with SuperSport, another Naspers subsidiary, which gave the pay channel exclusive TV rights to all PSL fixtures.

The figures don't add up? (Do the math):

In his interview with Alec Hogg on SAfm's Market Update with Moneyweb last night, Hein Brand - group MD, Media24 stated: "It was a R2,6m contract, it was 130 tons. Put in context, that plant processes 22 000 tons a year, so it's a fraction of their throughput. It sounds like a lot, but I promise they handle many of these and that group probably handles more than 800 discrete similar jobs every week, so it's one of 800 similar walk-in clients." If Paarl Web handled 800 similar jobs a week this would be 800 X 130 tons = 104 000 tons a week. Close on five times the print tonnage claimed by Naspers for the plant in a year.
 
Hahahaha re the numbers not adding up. And R250k-R350k only? They are not covering themselves in glory at all.
 
guys business is business

if you get a 3m for something u do it, because if you dont someone else will

one would hope that at least you do business with a conscious. should be the least we expect of our business leaders (as well as govt).
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X